Jonnan001

Jonnan001

Joined Member # 3173210
0 Posts 359 Replies 9,290 Reputation

Just got my first Terror Stars online about two game weeks ago. They don't appear to move? Is there something, obvious or less than obvious I'm missing about using terror stars? I right click and it sits there, no 'flight plan', nothing. I've researched all five steps, using the Altarian tech tree, waited a couple weeks for any movement points to refresh, the terror star says [5/5] on the modules, I've threatened the lives of my minions and and screamed "Why am I surrounded by FOOLS!"

2 Replies 4,142 Views

[quote who="Sole Soul" reply="3" id="1955363"] Quoting Jonnan001, reply 2I happened to look at it under 1.95, (Currently playing the same save game under 2.00) and no, it does not seem to allow decommissioning the bio-modulator. Jonnan My original post assumed you saved it in 2.00 and were playing it in 1.95-I'm now reading it as saving in 1.95 and playing in 2.00. (If it's the former, all it proves is that it can't be done in 2.00. If it's the latter, it prov

6 Replies 5,814 Views

I just don't understand that, conceptually - yeah, Ron Paul is conservative, literally. He wants to run an economy like it was the 1800's again. Longer, deeper recessions, but on the good side you had more of them too. Yay. Quick rundown: recessions of the 20th century ; before the Great Depression and the advent of Keynesian economics, from 1900 to 1929 there were 8 recessions in 29 years - 11.25 years spent in recessions

150 Replies 719,858 Views

How come conservatives always discover how unconservative the people they elected are after their policies have failed for years? Bush's Policies are virtually identical to the policies Reagan tried to implement. Fortunately for Reagan the Democrats were in control of Congress, so it turns out that, since Reagan couldn't get it all passed, he's still conservative. It's the successful conservatives that always get reclassified as liberal after the fact. "Stewa

150 Replies 719,858 Views

Sorry vxt22 - I don't buy that theory of economics, and I somehow fooled my college professors into giving me A's in economics (My professor was a professional stockbroker and had made his money during the heydey of Reaganomics, just to forestall the inevitable 'college liberals' comments. We argued a lot, but I learned a lot from him too.) with aminor in business (Major in Computer Science, minors in Business and Mathematics). Saying that it's never the fault of capitalism,

150 Replies 719,858 Views

[quote who="psychoak" reply="11" id="1954725"]References? Why do you need references from me? Your own links already point out the flaws in your view just fine. [/quote]Umm - this kind of out of context mistake is why I would need references. [quote who="psychoak" reply="11" id="1954725"]The Community Reinvestment Act was passed in 1977 under Carter. The Democrats had 61 seats in the Senate and 292 in the House. The act forced banks to make a wider vari

150 Replies 719,858 Views

I'm glad someone mentioned the "Chronicles of Amber" - definitely one of the best. Regarding "Star Wars" - Science Fiction that stays within the known or 'reasonable' speculative laws of science is definitely Science Fiction, but I would argue that any science fiction in which you *can't* say that such and such is impossible because it violates the 'known' laws of the universe qualifies as fantasy - even Star Trek had (with occasional bad writing) some definite technological rules - c

99 Replies 265,517 Views

So, lets be clear on this, assuming you're responding to my post (On the one hand, it's the only post it looks like you *could* be responding to, on the other, you have no references or quotes, thus no context) - you're actually drawing a line, for some reason, between a sub-prime loan crisis that was precipitated by a lack of regulation, through some errors made by Fannie/Freddie which are really not at all related, and to the S&

150 Replies 719,858 Views

You can almost shut them down just by putting spies on their planet - seems to shut them down fairly hard and they don't seem to do counter espionage. Alternatively you can put a few engines on a ship and stay just close enough for them to chase you and lead them into the territory of someone you don't like anyway. Jonnan

4 Replies 3,487 Views

Something I think is unbalancing, that it seems like could be updated would be "Eyes of the universe", and in general the AI not thinking sensors or engines are worth putting on a ship. Assuming that the AI is as bound by the same sensor ranges I am (Having shadowed enemy ships before, it seems to be the case that you can see them and not have them see you.), and that only anomalies are trackable outside visual range, it seems to me that AI's *really* should value sensors a bit more,

24 Replies 70,935 Views

I've noticed that internally in a given game 'X', it only recognizes ships that existed when the game was created or were created in game, not new ships created outside the game in question et al; presumably the system creates an array and adds to it as new designs are added, but I suspect it 'obsoletes' designs by deleting the pointers, which impies that updating the array from outside would 'unobsolete' designs, sooooooo . . . it doesn't. So if you created a new game, *then* ported

1 Replies 4,513 Views

[quote who="DeadMG" reply="25" id="1952319"]Works in our school. Computing this way becomes more and more viable as more and more bandwidth is created on the Internet. Quantum computers could also use this, since IIRC a quantum computer can run an infinite amount of threads.[/quote] I think it actually works out that, for a specific type of NP problem, quantum computer of n-bits can run 2^n threads simulaneously, although I will certainly vouch for 2^32 or 2^64 being very big numbers

72 Replies 292,437 Views

No - Beam weapons are cooler, and result in vastly better battles - accordingly time spent watching "Battlestar Galactica", "Star Wars" and "Bablyon Five" is counted against the 300 point Beam Weapons discount. Due to the vast number of uber-babes seduced by Jim Kirk, Star Trek only counts for higher morale bonuses. It's True - you've never caught me lying to you before have you - {G} - Jonnan edit: No one appears to have mentioned that ship build bug to the Altairians

24 Replies 70,935 Views

[quote]Oh, btw, Clinton started this whole economic meltdown crap by ordering Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to grant more loans to people who probably wouln't be able to pay of their loans because "everyone must be equal." I also found it interesting that even though Obama promissed "change," more than half of his cabinet is from Clinton's....[/quote] Just in the neither here nor there, although Fannie/Freddie made some mistakes, the GOP 'they caused this meltdown' theory has been pret

150 Replies 719,858 Views

[quote]Besides the obvious, I mean.[/quote] I guess that statement confuses me? I could see having other arguments regarding where to draw the line, maybe a large planet allowing for a larger population or 'x million per usable tile' and if you go above *that* is when the morale penalty cuts in, but if I'm going to play a game that has any internal logic at all, I'm perfectly content with there being a limit on the requirements that the population has a size limit - .

46 Replies 93,751 Views

[quote who="ReuelKB" reply="12" id="1949794"] Quoting Jonnan001, reply 16 If Stardock/Ironclad made this game with the current taxes in place and were able to sell it digitally for $20 US; does it or does it not make sense that if taxes were raised on them, to say, the tune of net result, $5 US per digital copy, that they would raise the price to the consumer, passing along the "tax" increase, or eat the $5 US from their bottom line? That would be $2,500,000 US they would have to ea

150 Replies 719,858 Views

[quote who="psychoak" reply="9" id="1948937"]You really don't grasp it do you? There is a difference between the Constitution, and federal, state and local statutes. You claim the Constitution a living document subject to the will of the Supreme Court by referencing a case where the Supreme Court rules that the Constitution is itself supreme, and as the statute conflicted with it, was null. Marshall didn't even refer to the Constitution as law in his opinion.&nbsp

150 Replies 719,858 Views

[quote who="psychoak" reply="6" id="1948605"]Read your own links next time, douche bag.[/quote] I do. You're screaming and throwing fits in no way changes the fact that under English-derived common law the courts are the last word on how that constitution is interpreted - as indicated by both the common law, and the constitution itself. The argument *you* are quoting out of context is actually raised in direct opposition to your belief that the court has no right to decide wha

150 Replies 719,858 Views

As for the rest - Since to the best of my knowledge every attempt to claim the Soviets were vastly outspending us militarily is either made up out of nwhole cloth or tracks back to Team B, yeah, the fact that Team B was wrong on almost everything strikes ve a vaguely relevant to the conversation. Frankly, given your penchant for asseting stuff without any references, there's no way to really tell if your making it up or it's another one of those vague "I heard this and it's been debun

150 Replies 719,858 Views

Actually, some asshole in a dress saying it is so *has* made it so, since Nov 11th 1608 when the High Justice of the English Court (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Coke) faced down King James and established that the courts, not the king, were the final interpreters of the law, an interpretation that became English common law in the case of Dr. Bonham (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr._Bonham%27s_Case), and expicitly accepted in the U.S. Constitution under Article III of the Constitution "

150 Replies 719,858 Views

[quote who="psychoak" reply="25" id="1946835"]I fail to see how attempting to not quadruple the level of domestic spending and increasing military spending to kinda sorta keep up with the Soviets makes him a liar when he blames congress for adding a bunch of the domestic spending back in. Instead of assuming republicans don't pay attention, perhaps you could consider that maybe they don't want the government to be coddling a third of the population? The Soviets were outspendi

150 Replies 719,858 Views

[quote who="psychoak" reply="21" id="1945674"]Actually, my math was perfect. My reading comprehension on the other hand appears to have some issues. If you didn't just skim my post that should have been obvious since I said 2.5% to 6% deficit. I'm not awake that early in the day. The 1983 budget was 23.3% deficit spending. Reagan proposed a 758 billion dollar budget, they passed 802 billion dollars instead. With nothing but the automa

150 Replies 719,858 Views

I think fundamental 'revamp' for starbases is to make a decision about just how much space a starbase has on it and building modules with that space in mind - to my mind a starbase should be at least twice the size of your largest hull, with the modules worked to account for that - the difference between a military, civilian, and influence starbase might be the construction sequence, rather than starting it initally then, though I'm not sure if you could translate that over to a Mining starba

17 Replies 13,247 Views