True but this is what just happened to me and many others in MA under patricks plan(which obama's plan is similar too) In november last year the state all of a sudden said that insurance from midwest life was no longer qualified as healthcare in MA so everyone that had it got fined anyway... Gee I wonder if the national gov't will do the same to raise quick cash off of those who get the lower cost care the way MA did.
The witcher SoaSe Dip Majesty 2 Sup Com 2
[quote]Communism- its paid for by th government.[/quote] Too bad I live in the U Ass of A. I would definitley go for a socialist health care... not the obama force people to buy it and if you don't have enough money for it then we'll fine you plan.
LRM's and Ilums are easy prey for carriers.... learn to play instead of complaining
I did mean sentinels but I mis-spoke a little. They shouldnt be the biggest part of your force. enforcers, carriers and subverters should be the main part just didnt want the op to forget the importance of having some sentinels in the fleet even in late game. Some new players think once you get the strongest ships thats all they should build. Also just because a ship is further to the right in the build menu doesnt mean its necessarily stronger.(like the overseer)
Bad grammer equals rape because I said stealing might end up taking money from people who need it for house and medical payments.....alrighty then. plus this is just a forum discussion... chill dude.
Its definitely not the same as copying someone's homework.. Your friend lets you copy it for one thing. Also it might seem ok to you because you see the big faceless corporation but you dont see the programmers that are making 25-30 grand a year that end up losing theyre job because the game they made didnt gross enough because of pirating .. then they cant afford health insurance for theyre kid and when they catch something really bad get refused care and then maybe die fro
Pirating is stealing..Thats is why its called pirating. Because pirates steal. However i give applause to anyone who does it to EA... They deserve it considering they just pirate ideas for games and if the person complains they buy them out.
I would give you karma, but I'm not really here ..... Or am I?
I've never had late game eco problems as vasari.. of course I build at least 1 trade post and 1 resource building at each planet with extra ones at the planets with bonuses. To the OP dont build many overseers... they are the most useless ship... your strong ships are the sentinel and enforcers.. my early fleet usually contains 3 cap ships(one siikantra ,, one evacuator-for colonizeing and one kortul devastator... ) I'll usuall y have 10 skirmishers 10 sentinels and 1
One thing in supocom 2 that is definite improvement is that you dont have to upgrade individual engineers and then find that particular one to build a hight level tech. Its all done in the tech tree instead and any engineer can build anyting that is researched.
If they were interchangeable then they all would have hover units and no navy. The real differences now are in the experimentals anyway. I do agree that it is about armies but if the whole army is made of paper units it makes the army feel like paper too. It would be nice if each faction had a different superweapon instead of just nukes. And I'm not trying to say that this is the best rts either.. I think its decent and only bought it because no other base buildi
I would give you karma, but I'm not a phantom
[quote]I don't mind the single player and coop at all though. It's an imperfect beast but it is nice to not have to rebuild your fortress every mission. This is more of a classic RTS problem of single player campaigns sucking,[/quote] Actually there were quite a few missions in the older CnC games where you didnt build bases. Same for the dune series. I thought they did a great job giving a little of everything for everyone.. They should have just incorporated a diffe
Sins Forums
If you just connected your new computer to the modem make sure that you unplug the modem and then plug it back in. Otherwise it will still be looking for your old pc and but see the new one and think it is an imposter so wont connect to the internet. So shut down and unplug everything including your modem and router(if you have one) and then replug and retry.
[quote] some dude was trying to convince me I needed to get the Act of War games because they're so much better than Generals and I found them on sale and ya know THEY SUCK as I expected That is all.[/quote] Wasnt really triying to say they were better ... just that the concepts of those games were incorporated into generals
I see EA pushing to make the dev team to rush stuff out quick ...beware of the sequels getting shorter and lamer. hell this one was already 20 hours shorter than they're last independent release.
I was sondering if the game is turn based .. and if it is are the battles real time? I would also like to know if I can actually control ships in battle. Its the only thing that I didn't like in galciv 2 was that I couldnt control anything.
I only get slowdowns even with large fleets if the trade ship icons are on. ohter wise it runs sweet... too bad they tried so hard no to have high graphics card requirements.. dont they know that 99% of pcs come with at least a 512 card in them now? Instead they end up with a game that is too cpu heavy and can only use on core. my7 specs amd phenom ii 965 3.4 asus crosshair 3 mother board 8 gb ddr3 1066 corsair dom. in dua
[quote]Anyway, EA have already clarified that they aren't charging for demos. They might release prequel game content to those who want to buy it[/quote] Wow does george bush work for them. If people dont like the word then change what you call it right!!!!
[quote]I did a user review on Real War back in 2001 and ripped it to shreds. [/quote] as would I since i didn't like those games or CnC generals.
I would give you karma, but my Jets will need it next year!
[quote]I thought Generals was the best [/quote] you should try out the real war games then I'm sure they are either free or 2 $ by now
I liked every release unitl red alert 3.They already screwed up the harvesting in that one. Hell I think they just got rid of it because they couldn't find a way to fix harvester pathfinding issues. (didnt care for generals either which was a ripoff of the real war series)they had the same helicopter resource system and pick up parts for upgrade system.
just to let you guys know ddr3 does not mean triple channel ...... triple channel means the ram slots on the motherboard go to 3 address buses on your cpu.. (hint.. there are no cpu's that take 3 address buses)in which case each set of 2 should be the same to be stable. you can use ddr 2 and have it be triple channel. also most ddr3 mobos have only 4 slots becasue once again ddr2 doesnt mean double channel and ddr3 does not mean triple channel. They are referen