LordCarlos

Reply to The Kushana Initiative - Play By Council in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

Sorry that i didn't speak before about this issue councilors but counting or recording the "FOR" votes only on the bills is not a good practice. There is one single problem that makes this system useless. How can we differentiate people that didn't vote for the bill, from people that were afk during the voting process?t. If you want to vote against, the councilor just needs to do nothing. Than how can we diferentiate those councilors from people that simply wasen't here.</p

Reply to AAR of A Tyrant in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

[quote who="qrtxian" reply="4" id="2805466"]By the way, how do I upload a screenshot? I'm using Google Docs not Imageshack, if that makes a difference. So far I can't figure out how to do anything but create a link to the image, which doesn't have quite the aesthetic I'm looking for (as in the screenshots for "The Kushana Initiative") This is what I currently have to post: https://doc-08-1k-docs.googleusercontent.com/docs/secure/v4qvrqncj424c2q3lb3e9ma3br0mic1r/etiuej4ka

Reply to Play by Council Planning Thread in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

[quote who="TMS2224" reply="10" id="2804192"]Alright, how is this for the race? Race: Ship Trim: White Ship Hull: Black Super Ability: Super Warrior Abilities: Military Production;+50/HP;30/Weapons;+20/Soldiering;+30/Espionage;+30/Defense;+10 WAR PARTY Does anyone care how the galaxy is set up? I usually play HUGE, 8 Minors, Mega Events ON, with the AI at Normal, habitable planets occasional, stars abudant, planets abunda

Reply to The Kushana Initiative - Play By Council in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

[quote who="Tolmekian" reply="101" id="2803374"]To address LordCarlos's concern about the ballot becoming too hectic: Many of these "micromanaging" issues being voted on are going to fall off the ballot as the game progresses. I have just been providing things to discuss while there isn't much to do. When we have 10 or 20 colonies, every improvement isn't going to come up for a vote. We'll just have to propose broader ballot issues, in general, with only a few spe

Reply to Play by Council Planning Thread in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

I think i'll go with the drengi solely on the basis of the good background. the nanos one is a little too far-fetched for me (It's funny how you turn off your sense of disbelieve for some thing and not for others, it seems completely arbitrary to me).

Reply to The Kushana Initiative - Play By Council in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

I would like to propose a new layout. (It looks really diferent than the one on word but i think it's close enough) Production ____________________________________________________________________________ -Gunray Plan (Production to be divided at 30% military, 20% social, and 50% research) FOR: qrtxian, SarcFa, TMS2224 AGAINST: Noctilucus, Nikolai

Reply to The Kushana Initiative - Play By Council in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

Where is councilor qrtxian with the ballot?

Reply to AAR of A Tyrant in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

Looking foward to it.

Reply to The Kushana Initiative - Play By Council in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

If the commander agrees that we need more ships to keep colonizing further i will not vote against the proposal. I agree with the research plan also, although i still belive Xeno Economics should come first, and than follow that up with Sensors I, Xeno Industrial theory and Universal translators. Nothing more to say on this Front.

Reply to Play by Council Planning Thread in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

Well i would like to join. And like i said in the other post i want a machine race maybe the yor, but something like a machine apocalypse or roucge scientist building machines.

Reply to The Kushana Coalition for Prosperity in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

[quote who="Noctilucus" reply="14" id="2799710"] On the topic of colonizing planets in enemy territory, we should strike the right balance between expanding our borders and risking attrition (cultural flips) by having isolated planets too deep in enemy territory.[/quote] Tha is something i believe the commander can micromanage, no need for the council to discuss that.

Reply to The Kushana Coalition for Prosperity in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

Ah i forgot, there is no topic on this election i feel we must address as a party. I could say we should vote to keep xeno economics on the plan but i highly doubt anyone is going to contest that one. I also don't agree with councilor's TMS2224's proposal to build a industrial planet but that is hardly an issue, it is not my opinion we should do that, but i can understand that if we want to try and colonize planets on enemy territory we will need that planet, so the party will leave t

Reply to The Kushana Initiative - Play By Council in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

Greetings Commander and fellow councilors. I need to congratulate the commander and his staff on this one, i don’t think i have much to add this time. First things first, Commander Mekoides i agree with your plan. Councilor -___-’s idea for colonization is sound, but this are specifics that the commander and his staff are best equipped to deal with. I don’t agree with Councilor&rsq

Reply to Faredesian Refuge play by council in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

Yeah lets go with the Yor. Machine apocalypse anyone?

Reply to The Kushana Coalition for Prosperity in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

Yeah, but i do think it's just a character thing, i don't really think he was offended by that.

Reply to Faredesian Refuge play by council in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

Argh What the hell, i request to join. Also you should've made a introduction thread, cause if you start your AArs on this one it will be confusing as hell.

Reply to The Kushana Coalition for Prosperity in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

Lol,I like how he handles his character.

Reply to The Kushana Coalition for Prosperity in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

[quote who="NikolaiOmega" reply="4" id="2797057"]He's trying that again? TMS2224 is just a gun nut. Let's bring it down.[/quote] Well i wouldn't know about that councilor but i do feel he is taking an unhealthy approach to this matter. Surely we do not need a technology which we won't use for years, Nor do we need to deviate resources from our colonizing efforts. Building war ships this early on would be wasteful. I would like to know that all members feel comfortabl

Reply to The Kushana Initiative - Play By Council in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

[quote who="TMS2224" reply="64" id="2797065"] Quoting NikolaiOmega, reply 4He's trying that again? TMS2224 is just a gun nut. Let's bring it down. Councilor, Please don't insult me. I simply wish to protect the Initiative. Also, if my proposal is outdated by the time of the next session then I will retract it. Now stop insulting me please, I hate being compared with inatimate objects like nuts, plus I am allergic to nuts. Seriously, insult me again and I won't

Reply to The Kushana Coalition for Prosperity in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

[quote who="TMS2224" reply="59" id="2796978"]TMS2224's Research Deviation Proposal Councilor qrtxian, I would like to propose a motion that would be put on the next ballot. The motion would go under Research. It is as follows. We deviate from Dr. Malar's Plan and research up to Stinger One, then we go back to Dr. Malar's Plan.[/quote] Ok so councilor TMS2224 it's doing it again. I think we all agree here that at this time it would put us behind of other races

Reply to The Kushana Initiative - Play By Council in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

[quote who="TMS2224" reply="59" id="2796978"]TMS2224's Research Deviation Proposal Councilor qrtxian, I would like to propose a motion that would be put on the next ballot. The motion would go under Research. It is as follows. We deviate from Dr. Malar's Plan and research up to Stinger One, then we go back to Dr. Malar's Plan.[/quote] Again with your non-sense councilor. I look foward to the vote so that i can vote against your watefull policies.

Reply to The Kushana Initiative - Play By Council in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

[quote who="Noctilucus" reply="51" id="2796449"]For Ballot-Maker: Vote to qrtxian! Indeed he did a great job so far -__-, I only have one question, how should we address you, as your username is rather hard to pronounce? [/quote] I have to disagree Councilor Noctilucus, Councilor Sarcastic Face is not hard to pronounce at all.

Reply to The Kushana Initiative - Play By Council in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

[quote who="-__-" reply="48" id="2796166"]I've been following this for the past few days and would like to join for it seems interesting. So, may I join the council?[/quote] I got no objections.

Reply to The Kushana Initiative - Play By Council in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

Well Councilor TMS2224 you seem to be the one misunderstanding the Coalitions motive. As i have stated before, the coalition is not an anti-war or anti-imperialist party.The Coalition is a party wich advocates for an economic and diplomatic development of this initiative, and although we are not anti-war, we surely are anti-wastefull-war. The Coalition was created to get together like minded councilors who opposed your initial proposal and your further compromise, which a

Reply to The Kushana Initiative - Play By Council in AARs GalCiv2 Forums

[quote who="qrtxian" reply="30" id="2795267"] First, I'd like to begin my remarks by stating that I intend to remain independent of both the Imperialist and Prosperity coalitions that are forming. A moderate voice is necessary if this council is to avoid being paralyzed by partisanship. [/quote] It is a shame but i understand, i hold no ill will towards you or your decision. I agree Dr. Malar's research plan.I also propose that the research que