Yes, you have a good writing style. You begin with capturing the readers attention and lead them wondering what's going to happen. Did you eat all of those cherry nut cakes? :-)
the_Peoples_Party
I don't know what you're talking about Obama not doing nothing worth achieving an award! I am out raged :::::throws chair of death at Leauki:::::::: First, let's see here......um.....yeah he was the first african american president (well I'm not sure if I can say that because of the whole birth certificate fiasco), oh yeah that's an achievement (the whole birth certificate fiasco is an achievement as well). Considering every white person in the United States is racist.
[quote who="Cikomyr" reply="6" id="2393717"] Nor do I hold someone who wrote a fancy book 4000 years ago. Nor do I hold the people who translated it over the ages.[/quote] With that statement I guess we should just rid ourselves history. Other dead people giving accounts of events that happened to other dead people.
[quote who="KFC Kickin For Christ" reply="810" id="2393557"] I'll be in Israel in April, I am sure. Make it for the week of Independence Day? What day is that? I can tell you the dates of Marv's trip. It's April 15-25 but the cost is going to be somewhere in the vicinity of 10K for us both to go. So that could be a problem. Not because we don't have it but because my husband feels it's not a good use of God's money. So we'll see. Marv a
[quote who="Leauki" reply="5" id="2393331"] So you believe everything your father told you? When he was sufficiently adamant about it, yes. Why? Did you have a policy of not believing what your parents told you? How did that work out for you?[/quote] HA! This cracked me up, Leauki! I guess it worked out fine, I got hit by cars (still do for some reason) and I still get shocked by those things in the wall. Other then that and getting b
[quote who="Leauki" reply="802" id="2391812"] Ok, that place I know, I am sure. But I don't like chips. The great thing about Israel is that almost all food places are fairly excellent. You cannot easily go wrong. [/quote] Good finally, we know a similar place! The chicken I was not too impressed with (heck it was KFC like. Obviously the restuarant not the individual here on JU). The next statement about chips/fries c
P.S. One more thing. Leauki were you in Jerusalem when those Bears of Peace were there? Do you know what I'm talking about? Statues of Bears from every single country around the world. Trying promote world peace. My friends and I use to call them the Bears of Intolerance. If not I'm not going to continue with this story because it would just be pointless.
[quote](And oddly enough, while the Torah speaks of six days of work and one day of rest, many otherwise observant Jews in Jerusalem close their shops Friday at noon and do not follow the law of working six days and instead work less than 5 and a half.) [/quote] HA! I remember that. It really messed with you when all you wanted was a good shwarma for lunch or you wanted to go to Peanuts to get some good hummus. The Irish Pub usually stayed opened beyond
You keep saying that it came around with Luther (even though I have shown through several 1st century church fathers thats not true). I can play that dumb game as well and say 'your incorrect doctrine came about during the council of Trent in the 16th century' its only been around since then. Luther only brought it (scripture authority) back into light. If you take a look at the 1st century church fathers you'll see clearly what they believed. It wasn't Jesus
Let's take a look at how supposedly that solely Scipture is Protestant. Meanwhile your doctrine came about during the council of Trent. Let's take a look as to when solely Scripture authority came about. You stated that it came about during Martin Luther which is very convient for you. Now I wonder what the 1st Century church believed? When I take a look at Polycarp (I personally like him because he knew/was a disciple of John the Apostle), Clement, Ignatius,
“A sacrament is an outward sign instituted by Christ to give grace.” (but not evidenced by any Scripture somehow!)</sp
Last night a girl was out riding her bike minding her own business when the big bad police officers decide to beat her........ YEAH RIGHT! Here's the video: http://www.wpxi.com/video/21110533/index.html I can't believe people feel the police are at fault. Here is the rest of the story. The police were telling the crowd that they need to move f
[quote who="lulapilgrim" reply="782" id="2384326"]kfc posts 772 The Greek word for traditions literally means "things handed down" and refers here to divine revelation. Exactly what Sacred Apostolic Tradition is KFC, yes, indeed, exacly what it is....Divine revelation. Divine Revelation comes in both written Word Scripture and unwritten Word (oral) Tradition. It is both the unwritten Word and the written Word that St.Paul told the Thessalonians (and therefore us) to
[quote who="lulapilgrim" reply="771" id="2383122"] The RCC traditions are NO different than the traditions of the Pharisees of Jesus' times. They are traditions of men. Yes, men And if it is as you say, then I'd love to have you debate that with St.Paul. [/quote] You act some how that Paul would some how agree with you. Which I find highly laughable! 1 Corithians 2:2 'For I am determined to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ and HIM crucified.
Ha! Ravenstahl is a ninnyhammer! Rightwinger, I never knew you were a fellow Pittsburgher! Did you know that Ravenstahl recently bought this huge house? I can't remember where it is, but maybe we should send the protestors there. I don't know what that lepton is thinking because yes people will notice Pittsburgh but the G-20 also brings that million dollar damage tag. Just take a look at Seattle when they held it. He wouldn't have accepted it if he K
Most of your points are dubious and moot. It doesn't refute most of my statements. You bring up Deuteronomy 18:5 as if it is going to come to me as shock, me being a jew? You're going to have a rough time agruing that this is the Apostolic Oral Tradition because most Orthodox Jews (aka Religious Jews) will say this is the Oral Law a la the Talmud. Which you should read sometime and you'll understand why I'm saying this. Unless you're saying that RCC Church has taken up there
First, are you saying that Scriptures are not enough? Do you know what Psalm 119 concerns itself with? It concerns itself with an individual heeding to the word of G-D. Scriptures says that G-D's word is a lamp to all the heed it. Psalm 119:105 'Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path.' Every 'young man' is exxpected to heed to G-D's word: Psalm 119:9 'How can a young man keep his way pure? By keeping Your word. Jesus said 'If you continue in MY WORD,
[quote who="KFC Kickin For Christ" reply="747" id="2378555"] You missing her whole crux which is replacement theology. That's why she views Acts 2 as she does and Matthew 21:43. KFC, all you have been doing is just messing with the 'stems' instead of the root of the issue which is Lula believes in replacement theology because the RCC believes in it. no. I'm not missing it. In fact, I've mentioned this to her several times over the course of three y
The view of Matthew 21:43 being Israel is going to be replaced, however, is improbable for several reasons. The first problem concerns the identity of the “you” from whom the kingdom would be taken. Several interpreters have pointed out that the “you” probably refers to the current leaders of Israel and not the n
The Tanack explicitly teaches the restoration of the nation of Israel Zechariah 12-14, Zephaniah 3:14-20, Amos 9:11-15, Ezekiel 36-37 (these passages promise the future salvation and restoration of the Nation of Israel to its land) Jeremiah 30-31;32 (This promises a New covenan along with promises of restoration of Israel that includes spiritual blessings and physical blessings), Deuteronomy 30:1-6 (Israel would experience dispersion because of disobedience but would one day be saved
KFC, Lula views scripture from a replacement/supersession theology. Everything she is stating is coming from the view point for that is the 'lenses' that she views Scripture with. You missing her whole crux which is replacement theology. That's why she views Acts 2 as she does and Matthew 21:43. KFC, all you have been doing is just messing with the 'stems' instead of the root of the issue which is Lula believes in replacement theology because the RCC believes
Paul calls himself a Pharisee. Paul was a Jewish theologian who anchored himself in the Tanack. He is a Hebrew of the Hebrews. Paul considered himself a Pharisee (I'm not talking about how people now a days toss around Pharisee. Back during the 1st century there were several sects of Pharisees. To be a Pharisee you had to have all of the Torah and most of the Tanack memorized) through out his whole life. He proclaimed himself to be a Pharisee in the line of
I didn't realize my resume was going to be gigantic when I posted it! Any thoughts or comments? Any insights?
[quote who="Leauki" reply="637" id="2371195"] And he will return to heaven disappointed when he notices that the Catholic Church has declared the people of Israel no longer the people of G-d , and the Messiah will find that he cannot fullfill his task of returning the children of Israel to the holy land because "his" church won't let him. [/quote] That provided a good laugh of truth as did the tail end of it. :-D p.s. I guess L
[quote]I can not in all good consciousness KFC worship a man as God. There is only one God, and Jesus is not it. A wonderful teacher, a fulfillment of a promise made by God that man shall not forever dwell in this world but will resume his journey back to God, he is all these things, but above and beyond that, he was a man, not God. If he were he would not have referred so many times to his "father" or to himself as the "son of God". We are all children of God because God is the cre