countdown to lock... 3... 2... 1...
charon2112
The more I think about dynasties being cut, the less I like the decision. Dynasties were one of the more original and interesting things about EWoM...the system just needed to be fixed a bit. Like having an heir take over as sovereign after the previous sovereign dies.
The best manual I ever saw was the one that came with my copy of Civ II, it was huge!
Will there be an awesome, all inclusive, hopefully 300 page, super cool manual for Fallen Enchantress (which was lacking in EWoM)? And for those getting a digital download of it for free, can they get a paper version that would be in the retail FE? Thank you.
[quote who="Zubaz" reply="19" id="2940727"]CariElf *is* cute and wonderful in many ways. [/quote] Yes! [e digicons]:rofl:[/e]
[quote who="Tridus" reply="19" id="2940168"] Quoting charon2112, reply 17 I don't agree with that. Nothing is etched in stone, especially in a Stardock game. It can definitely be improved, and I'm sure SD isn't afraid of work. Welcome to business reality, then. They also need to make some money on this stuff to continue developing it, and that's not going to happen with WoM now. It is what it is. FE means a chance to start fresh, and a new set
[quote who="Cruxador" reply="34" id="2940024"]Also the "less city micromanagement" in this interview sounded suspiciously close to "dumbed down" or "deemphasized", but it's Stardock so I'm at least far less worried than I otherwise might be.[/quote] I was worried about this too.
That's why it's called a double standard, duh. It's a numbers thing, male gamers on this site outnumber girls, maybe, 5000 to 1. and even worse is when guys pretend they don't care, because they think it gets them on her 'good side'... Every straight guy on here is wondering the same thing...at least I'm honest about it. [quote who="StevenAus" reply="9" id="2940007"]Exactly.&n
[quote who="Tridus" reply="16" id="2939707"]It's also a very large amount of work, and not worth doing for what is now an old game. At some point people need to accept that WoM is what it is, and trying to freeze time to avoid the new game while also saying "dump a ton of resources into this one" is just not realistic.[/quote] I don't agree with that. Nothing is etched in stone, especially in a Stardock game. It can definitely be improved,
that's too bad, because a problem like bland AI races is totally fixable, and would dramatically change the game for the better.
a strange game...the only winning move is not to play.
That's amazing. :) And so lazy on 2K's part... [quote who="Thormodr" reply="31" id="2936817"]Civilization 5 is still a mediocre game (or worse) in my opinion because it was released far, far, far too early. That bun should have spent at least another year in the oven if not two. 2K Games wanted to appease their shareholders and make their year end reports look better. Civilization 5's AI is not good at all. The gameplay is
I just want a game that's as awesome as GalCiv2 but with a fantasy setting.
But FE is really a whole new game, so improving a problem in FE doesn't fix the problem in WoM. I'd still like to see WoM fixed, not just forgotten for FE. [quote who="Heavenfall" reply="4" id="2939006"]I seem to recall Frogboy saying this blandness was "by design", and that it was a mistake, and that they would have a different approach in FE which is more content-driven.[/quote]
The real question is...is Cari_Elf super cute? :)
This is cool. I wish I had thought of it. [quote quoting="post"] A big congrats goes out to xmorg who has won the Fallen Enchantress “Design a Trait” contest! His trait, Outlaw Connections, took the top spot! “The Hero has spent some time with the lawless and knows a little about how to communicate with bandits. The Hero may recruit bandits he encounters in the wilds, at a small cost of gold and prestige. Bandits ca
[quote who="tetleytea" reply="2" id="2927041"]I'd be interested in seeing a comparison of Civ V to Civ IV on the latest patch. I haven't heard enough good things to justify not sticking with Civ IV.[/quote] They're two very different games. I play both.
Brad locked the thread for a reason. Why would you re-post it?
I actually like the weeks measurement in GC2 better than other 4X games. It makes sense to me that it might take a civilization five weeks or so to build a ship. I just assume they have a large, advanced factory. In Elemental they changed it to "seasons", basically 4 turns is a year, and I feel like it cranks too fast through the years.
[quote who="Frogboy" reply="46" id="2915681"] Are the maps and terrain randomly generated? Yes. Unlike War of Magic, the continents are generated on the fly.[/quote] cool! [e digicons]:thumbsup:[/e]
Are the maps and terrain randomly generated? It sounds like FE is getting even farther away from being a empire building, 4X game; instead focusing more on the RPG aspects. IMO this is a mistake. I have yet to hear grand design decisions that put Elemental on par (strategy game wise) with Galciv2. [quote quoting="post"] One of the most common series of questions I’ve been getting over the past month is what the difference bet
[quote who="mentalinstra" reply="8" id="2914435"] Quoting charon2112, reply 7My question is: Once FE comes out, what reason is there to ever play WoM again? There wont be one.[/quote] So it's more than a stand alone expansion, it's a replacement...
My question is: Once FE comes out, what reason is there to ever play WoM again?
There are many aspects to the landscape (including rivers) that could be changed or added to greatly improve the city planning and Civilization building aspects of the game. It's the thing that I think needs to be fixed the most, and it's being discussed by the devs the least...
I didn't bad-mouth your system...in fact I specifically said mine was much worse. When I said something's wrong, I meant with the game. [quote who="Arnuphis" reply="10" id="2912401"] Quoting charon2112, reply 9Something's wrong here for sure. My PC pales in comparison to yours and runs EWoM flawlessly. quoting post Because frankly, it runs pretty poorly. The game slows down so quickly as to becom