[quote who="InfiniteVengeance" reply="1" id="2212758"]*Hits the karma down button*[/quote] *Hits the report button*
JagerJack
How much gold do you get for killing a Demigod at lvl 1-3? I think it's somewhere around 1k but I'm not sure.
[quote who="StealthyItalian" reply="2" id="2212427"]Thanks for the reply and oh btw bleach rocks[/quote] It sure does. Bleach is one of my favorite manga/anime. I love the style. Oh, and you're welcome.
That seems to be the case. The same thing is happening to me and everyone else, apparently. There is an update coming that should fix the favor, and they are planning on resetting the stats once all the problems are worked out.
[quote who="TheBifman" reply="12" id="2212285"] Quoting InfiniteVengeance, reply 11 They hurt towers too, what's up with that? Makes a lot more sense than spit hurting towers...[/quote] Spit is acid. Acid melts things. Makes perfect sense to me.
[quote who="Kitkun" reply="17" id="2211449"] Yes, it would be hard but possible for assasins to win the award if healing yourself was included. I was arguing against the award only counting against healing allies, which would be impossible for assasins to get. Ah, okay. Still, Universal Gadget can be used on allies if I recall.[/quote] You're right, but I don't think it would be fair for an assasin to have an award that can only be achieved by buying an item while general
[quote who="Kitkun" reply="10" id="2211262"] You say that support characters can't get certain awards. But they can. Generals can use minions to destroy buildings, out-creep assasins, etc. And while they might have to work harder to get a kill award, it's still possible. In other words, all awards are possible to obtain by all DG. It might be harder for some DG to obtain certain awards, but that's because that is not the area they excel at. Saying that generals can'
A tower Rook on Crucible. With the Queen of Thorns as an ally. On fortress. Needless to say, I lost that one.
Banned because you cannot defeat the Empire. It will be back.
I'm not so sure I like the Concede and Smart Quitting options. They seem like something that could be easily abused by rage quitters.
[quote who="Fred_Bonaparte" reply="6" id="2210694"] Quoting JagerJack, reply 5 Here's a fun fact: SOME DEMIGODS ARE BETTER SUITED TO WIN SOME AWARDS THAN OTHERS. This award is no different. Except for the fact that it would be IMPOSSIBLE for some Demigods to get the reward. Support DG like QoT are still capable of getting the kills, assist, damage or building awards. The first 2 might be more difficult, but it wouldn't be impossible. But the UB, TB, Rook, and Reg wo
[quote who="line0042" reply="4" id="2210388"]I actually made a thread about this a while ago..http://forums.impulsedriven.com/350303 The OP is absolutely correct. There NEEDS to be an award for healing/damage negated TO ALLIES. This would be sedna's heal, the oaks sheild, and QOTs bramble shield. All the people who are whining are completely wrong. Support characters need awards they can get. Sure, they can hypothetically get damage, b
The only time I've had a problem against an Oak was when there were 2 of them. Otherwise he's pretty easy to take down. Last Stand is extremely annoying though, I'll give you that.
Yes. It was said in the "Stats and Rage Quiting" post in the Demigod Journals section. They're going to reset most or all of the stats.
Yeah. The latest patch seems to have frozen them. They're going to be reset anyway, after all the problems are worked out.
Rage quiting is when you leave the game only because you got killed. If it's an unfair match-up where you have next to no chance of winning then I don't count it as a rage quit.
[quote who="Goggris" reply="4" id="2209713"]Hit or miss now. I played two this morning, both recorded. I played one this afternoon, full 2 on 2 no AI and NO disconnects. Does not even show up in the games list. It is quite frustrating. Have they acknowledged that there is an issue at least?[/quote] Yes, they have. They also plan on resetting the stats once the issues are worked out, so I wouldn't worry about games not being recorded.
[quote who="OrleanKnight" reply="23" id="2209677"]Here is a great arguement: Randomization is a self gradification tool that does not improve the quality of the game.[/quote] The game itself is a self gratification tool. You're playing to enjoy yourself, aren't you?
[quote who="Chaosnaska" reply="17" id="2209647"] Quoting Azrailx, reply 16no u totally shat on him, if he talks hes admiting his faliure Yea i know, but it'd be awesome if he actually tried to fight me back. Win woulda ensued.[/quote] All I know is it would have been hilarious.
Banned for wanting a hooker when you're a girl.
[quote who="InfiniteVengeance" reply="13" id="2209547"] Lets say you have a person who is used to playing the QoT(person #1) and another person who is used to playing the UB (person #2). If #1 got stuck with the Rook and #2 got lucky and was chosen to be the UB, who do you think would win? That's what I was saying. Where in the hell did I suggest that you would get matched only with people who mastered the game? I didn't say that was what you were saying. I'm saying that th
[quote who="InfiniteVengeance" reply="10" id="2209504"] Anyways, on topic. I think random games would be difficult because most people focus on 1 or 2 demigods, few people if any actually take the time to master all 8 of them. So if someone has bad luck and gets stuck with a DG they're unfamiliar with then they're pretty much screwed if the same thing doesn't happen to the enemy. Yeah, that's the point. You'd only get people who know how to play everything. (And also
[quote who="Shink" reply="8" id="2209442"] Quoting JagerJack, reply 6 Anyways, on topic. I think random games would be difficult because most people focus on 1 or 2 demigods, few people if any actually take the time to master all 8 of them. So if someone has bad luck and gets stuck with a DG they're unfamiliar with then they're pretty much screwed if the same thing doesn't happen to the enemy. This is actually why I love random. If i'm going to be invest
I think the moral of the story here is that all online games need some sort of mute button.
You people are taking the OP out of context. It was simply a very poor choice of wording. I seriously doubt he was trying to be offensive.