admiralWillyWilber

Reply to Building a better social media messaging site in Personal Computing GalCiv3 Forums

Ok free gaming on Facebook. Facebook basically took over MySpace. Mocospace basically is like Facebook, but instead if Facebook discouraging you from meeting new people. Mocospace encourages you to meet new people. My guess if they advertised better. They would do better. The more successful other social networks looks for something no one else does, and does that. Neighborhood you only socialize people in your zip code. Twitter you tweet thoughts. You need to find something no one successful

Reply to Building a better social media messaging site in Personal Computing GalCiv3 Forums

[quote who="Daiwa" reply="16" id="3797144"] MeWe is emerging as an alternative to Facebook. 2.5 million new members in the past week. I don't do any social media myself, just passing the info along. [/quote]what does mewe do that Facebook doesn’t do to be an alternative. Assuming it’s like Facebook.

Reply to Thoughts, Opinions and Suggestions in Galactic Civilizations IV GalCiv4 Forums

[quote who="Imperious-Leader-1" reply="11" id="3811054"] In GalCiv3 you could have 5 planets sponsor a shipyard. Now a single Core Planet sponsors a shipyard, and Minor Colonies sponsor Core Planets. But if you want to make most of your colonies Cores, you can with Governors. So have it. I like the feeder system, it makes sense. And it helps build powerful Core Colonies to dominate with. Yes you're not improving your Minor Colonies, but that's not their function. They are <br

Reply to Thoughts, Opinions and Suggestions in Galactic Civilizations IV GalCiv3 Forums

A very poor exchange I agree, but a higher class planet that doesn’t build anything. A class 5 or so colony. Ok I agree colonies cap out at 3 population is dependent on class. Class one or two would have a one or two citizen you couldn’t use where a class three, four, or five or oils cap out at three citizens. I have seen a different number from f citizens on colonies. My guess some planet types limits this citizen cap at one colonists. Without a further learning, my guess populat

Reply to Steam Key in Galactic Civilizations IV GalCiv3 Forums

[quote who="BigNorthMxO5845" reply="38" id="3810053"] The lack of a steam page has me a little worried that this game won't be coming to Steam. Hopefully they just haven't gotten around to it. I didn't even know this game was coming out until today when I happened to think I haven't played GC3 in a while and happened to see it's been a year since any new dlc news.... Unless I am overlooking it I don't even see a announcement on steam for GC4(in news or on the foru

Reply to Thoughts, Opinions and Suggestions in Galactic Civilizations IV GalCiv3 Forums

[quote who="Imperious-Leader-1" reply="6" id="3811017"] Alright I've played long enough to have an informed opinion. Here are some of my praises and concerns: Core Planets and Colonies First let me say I love the concept of Core Planets and feeder Colonies. Could we please get the ability to see the landscape of a Colony, so we can choose wisely whether it's our best option for a Core Planet? Maybe a "Survey Planet" o

Reply to Thoughts, Opinions and Suggestions in Galactic Civilizations IV GalCiv3 Forums

[quote who="DerekPaxton" reply="4" id="3810889"] We probably need to do a better job of communicating this. But assigning a governor isn't just having a person in charge of the planet. Its dedicating resources to changing the planet from a small group of colonists scratching out a meager exitance there with whatever resources the colony ship provides, into a world with cities, factories, and amusement parks. Where entire generations live, grow, and raise their families. The as

Reply to I will not play GalCiv IV on the Epic Store in Galactic Civilizations IV GalCiv4 Forums

I guess you should blame who ever allowed foreign nations to buy stocks, or whoever invented stocks.

Reply to admiral Willy Wilber’s feedback about galactic civilizations 4 in Galactic Civilizations IV GalCiv4 Forums

[quote who="gypsy2299" reply="14" id="3810915"] Quoting DerekPaxton, reply 12 Quoting admiralWillyWilber, reply 8 I like the o

Reply to admiral Willy Wilber’s feedback about galactic civilizations 4 in Galactic Civilizations IV GalCiv3 Forums

[quote who="DerekPaxton" reply="12" id="3810885"] Quoting admiralWillyWilber, reply 8 I like the option idea. Something else I was talking about is at least giving the colonies an auto build option. You could just carry over code from three. my safari on my iPhone says the security on this website is outdated. <b

Reply to Trading glitch/bug in GalCiv IV Early Access Feedback GalCiv4 Forums

Yeah I tried trading for everything, but the core planet for nonething, and it surprisingly accepted the deal. This is a bug that hopefully they will fix. Give them a chance to fix it before you exploit this.

Reply to A funny thing about making core worlds... in GalCiv IV Early Access Feedback GalCiv4 Forums

Please if we are going to have the above please give us an option to replace governors.

Reply to A funny thing about making core worlds... in GalCiv IV Early Access Feedback GalCiv4 Forums

[quote who="mrblondini" reply="8" id="3810808"] I think if Stardock want to allow us to manually assign colonies to a particular Core World because, say it's got great research buffs: 1. That assignment should be permanent. Or at least.... 2. You can unlink a colony and send it's resources to another Core Planet, but the Governor the Core Planet who just lost Colony VegaIV to Core World VortexII is going to be one very angry camper with you as his leader an

Reply to A funny thing about making core worlds... in GalCiv IV Early Access Feedback GalCiv4 Forums

[quote who="jdschw" reply="7" id="3810801"] Thanks for the response @DerekPaxton, that makes sense to me. If we always got a boost by making a core world, it breaks the whole colony/core-world paradigm because you'd always want core worlds. (And @Korwyn I do agree with you that there is a sense of realism in the current system as well.) After playing around with this more, I really think that the current system is fine, with the exception of the auto-assigned colonies. The abi

Reply to GalCiv IV Dev Journal #4 - A Guided ALPHA Tour in GalCiv IV Dev Journals GalCiv4 Forums

[quote who="Echo Ridge" reply="18" id="3810787"] Very excited but I do have a concern. I want to manage a Galactic Civilization... not a bunch of Galactic civilians. Is it going to feel like I am managing 18 people, or 18 planets? I think my concern is based on "feeling" and not execution though. It may still feel like you are managing a civilization, just not sure based on how I am interpreting the dev journals. Thoughts? [/quote]your m

Reply to GalCiv IV Dev Journal #4 - A Guided ALPHA Tour in GalCiv IV Dev Journals GalCiv4 Forums

[quote who="jglazier" reply="17" id="3809108"] My two comments . . . Segway? Come on Froggy! You write this massive guided tour of all the new features, but completely leave out combat? Isn't that one of the big new selling points? New and improved combat? But, you don't mention or describe it at all. Ok three . . . my three comments . . . Yay - looking forward to this one, once you get past the Epic exclusiv

Reply to A funny thing about making core worlds... in GalCiv IV Early Access Feedback GalCiv4 Forums

I agree with the op I think it should do the system as s is , but give you an option of reassigning colonies. One thing not taken into account is colonies are not built up. Core worlds are.

Reply to admiral Willy Wilber’s feedback about galactic civilizations 4 in Galactic Civilizations IV GalCiv4 Forums

[quote quoting="post"] [video][/video]1. I don’t like the tech random tech option can there be an option with a tree like 3. 2. I don’t like this core world thing can there be an option to have it like three. 3. If we are going to have a core world option. There are to many low class planets. 4. if we are still having a core option then can we at least have a auto build. The governor system n three could be a nice way. It’s not that hard

Reply to admiral Willy Wilber’s feedback about galactic civilizations 4 in Galactic Civilizations IV GalCiv3 Forums

[quote quoting="post"] [video][/video]1. I don’t like the tech random tech option can there be an option with a tree like 3. 2. I don’t like this core world thing can there be an option to have it like three. 3. If we are going to have a core world option. There are to many low class planets. 4. if we are still having a core option then can we at least have a auto build. The governor system n three could be a nice way. It’s not that hard

Bring back the Jagged knife. in Galactic Civilizations III GalCiv3 Forums

I remember the order and the Jagged Knife from two. It was broken and needed fixed. Every time people brought it up there were more comment that it wasn’t worse than some of the other events or it was broken than what the post was about. This would make a cool option.

Reply to admiral Willy Wilber’s feedback about galactic civilizations 4 in Galactic Civilizations IV GalCiv3 Forums

[quote who="Frogboy" reply="6" id="3810634"] The core worlds / colonies are here to stay. They're a..ahem...core feature. However, we are looking at having an option that would let players control the ratio between productive worlds and marginal worlds. So in effect, someone could set it up so that most planets are productive and combine that with a small number of habitable worlds. [/quote]I like the option idea. Something else I was talkin

Reply to admiral Willy Wilber’s feedback about galactic civilizations 4 in Galactic Civilizations IV GalCiv3 Forums

[quote quoting="post"] [video][/video]1. I don’t like the tech random tech option can there be an option with a tree like 3. 2. I don’t like this core world thing can there be an option to have it like three. 3. If we are going to have a core world option. There are to many low class planets. 4. if we are still having a core option then can we at least have a auto build. The governor system n three could be a nice way. It’s not that hard

Reply to admiral Willy Wilber’s feedback about galactic civilizations 4 in Galactic Civilizations IV GalCiv3 Forums

Correct I did mention this on discord. What I was wondering if I settle a planet with this other species does it penalise me somehow.

Reply to admiral Willy Wilber’s feedback about galactic civilizations 4 in Galactic Civilizations IV GalCiv3 Forums

[quote who="gypsy2299" reply="1" id="3810529"] This is not meant as a flame aWW just my thoughts on your post pro & con For 1,2,,4,& 12 you can always play three[e digicons]B)[/e] On a serious note 1 This is growing on me in a positive light, it does stop bee lining to great techs. The tech tree is coming so you will know which option to choose for your goals. 2 Sorta agree/disagree. This is also growing on me.

admiral Willy Wilber’s feedback about galactic civilizations 4 in Galactic Civilizations IV GalCiv3 Forums

[spoiler][/spoiler][video][/video][spoiler][/spoiler]1. I don’t like the tech random tech option can there be an option with a tree like 3. 2. I don’t like this core world thing can there be an option to have it like three. 3. If we are going to have a core world option. There are to many low class planets. 4. if we are still having a core option then can we at least have a auto build. The governor system n three could be a nice way. It’s not th