Freyja_Bjorn

At legendary or whatever it is elo based.

I understand your plight.. but this is mean't to be pushing limits and showing off the limits of hardware. Not back scaling for a small number of people.

I second this entirely! Keep it up! Let me know how I can put money towards other things though :D Like a unit name perhaps? :P

It needs to be this way, orbital nulifiers and mobile nulifiers means that you need to set up properly against someone who is good at the game. I don't expect many of you guys to of played much in the ways of high rank or skill. That's not mean't to be something that offends. However when playing against someone who is very good, using a nuke doesn't really do anything. You can nulify with a power at a quarter of the cost. If he's g

Air, to air and then ground and then mix. It's always the way in any rts game. If your opponent doesn't play accordingly you win quickly, or lose quickly. Did you think ranked would be slow and chill?

Definitely see the inspiration from tec reb titan.. love it!!

I have the 8520k and only run it at 3.7 very stable oc. I do have a gtx 1080 and 32gb ddr4. With your system I really don't see you needing to upgrade for any game in the near future.. I certainly won't be and If I really need to i'll just oc a little more.

Honestly I don't see why you would be upgrading that, beyond wasting money I don't see any need.

Majority of what you're suggesting isn't lore friendly. The worlds we are fighting over aren't inhabited. Naval units, although would be cool don't really make any sense when we have things that hover. You can just hover on water. Weather affecting game play is interesting but also too random to be fun in ranked. :[ Destructible landscape might be interesting though.

I am very excited about future prospects. I messaged frog on discord actually ^^ Loving the changes, the balance ensures we don't have 2 minute games with the turret abuse :] both parties did it and it was a case of who came out more frustrated

whole heartdly agree with this :D

I'm not saying it shouldn't be changed, I think instead of a timer on the drone perhaps a timer on the tower?

Adding to an army is a really nice way of managing your front lines whilst still being able to micro and building what each army needs over just an overall unit range. But I haven't had chance to test the teleport but in theory it would be OP... considering you need artemis or destructor for a decisive push and it'd take long enough for the enemy to push or do something else in this time. They are slow, so if it instaports half way across the map... I see good in this

Although I'm not this games designer I believe the feed back I gave was pretty adequate. This isn't the first game where people have whined over design choices or because they can't play the game how they want to play it and receive the same results as someone who is using everything as intended.

Bad Attitude, fix it.. seriously bro.. just chill a bit? (:

thanks for the f3 :]

They certainly will, but they only show you what they do and not why they do :]

I wonder if someone could recreate a map from c&c generals. Tournament desert, remade also in c&c 3. Those maps are superbly balanced :O

Well that's what I mean, it makes sense that they would be put off! I think we'll get some from the forums and perhaps from discord. Just try and find one person and stick with them until they are carbon copies of us maybe? (:

Hey guys, You may or may not know me. I was a pretty ok sins player when it first released. For awhile myself and doci were considered the top 2 man team and blah blah who cares. When we had problems with a lower player base and needed to set up 4s/5s we struggled to balance teams when there was 5 very good and 3 bad. Ashes is almost at a point where games take so long to set up and play that balance in teams is just as crucial and no one wants to fight a noo

Almost the same as the PHC artillery.. Knock out their radar! Use orbitals , if they have a nullifier get 6 bombers and kill it. Pretty easy :] hoep this helps

I'm not entirely sure how to respond, it seemed like a good post at the start but ended in horribly insulting towards the games designers. I'll break it down point by point for you so you might be able to understand. I will start by saying this, this game is designed in a way in which you have to do multiple things to win and not just play how you want to play. This doesn't make it unique in any sense. In every game, rts or otherwise you have to follow parti

I know didi was cheating, that isn't something up for discussion. He was, we talked about it together. But after being in the top 10, some players coming here and just accusing people because they got their asses kicked. I've smashed people and been called a cheater.. like fuck do I cheat. Some guy was like how do you have 500 power to my 80, i'm like.. dude it's a surveillance drone..

I think it's a good idea and really I love the idea. The game has a great potential and we as the community need to work with the devs to push things forward. This is a very strong step in the right direction though from stardock as this engages with consumers on a very personal level.

I actually was chatting to him about this before, (Didi) We were quite friendly at a point and when I was close to rank 10 we 1v1'd and he smashed me. I did think something was off as I'd never lost in such a manner before. Das has beaten me for example but only just. So it was strange for a rank 60 or whatever to smash me. Anyway we chatted after and he said he had a trainer. He did link me but I never wanted to use it. Though I did bring it up wi