greywar
You get what you pay for… <FONT face="arial, helvetic
You may have better accesss than you think or at least I hope you will. Keep your eyes open and your head down.
I guess I just don't use any of the things that would require more space on the 360. My 20 gig seems to be fine.
Sorry about the font size but anything with 10 pt or higher seems to handle multi-line paragraphs badly...
Why on earth do you watch that show?
Want to annoy a Sergeant? Tell them that it is their soldiers who hold most of the power and the majority will lose their freaking minds… Here is why. <FONT
I think it is Mark baker I think you are correct.. I didn't even see it down there...
I have no idea who authored the original... I still like it though... *Update: SSG Geezer has pointed out that it looks like Mark Baker is the name in the lower corner of the 1st panel. <IMG alt="Site Meter" src="http://sm5.si
I have used it for while and it did a very passable job with word files but not so well with power point compatibility.
Well spoken.
Sweet... glad to hear it. I have been following your articles but I rarely comment. It sucks being cooped up with a bad back.
Nice... I'm glad the reindeer pelts I got weren't urine cures...
We even have legislation to protect them from themselves with this sort of thing, but wonder of wonders... it still infects the stupid.
Just as asinine as it was the first time I heard it, all those years ago . . . Any particular argument you have for that? Do you beleive that she would have actually gone ahead and given up her grades? Or will you simply disparage without reason?
I second that.
It's an oldie but a goodie...
When you turn 18 in these United States we recognize you as an adult with all the rights, privileges, and responsibilities attendant thereon. <?xml:namespace prefix =
??? whatever...it's the media's fault, right? No, it is your fault that you can't actually read the article.
Humble, aren't we, greywar? No, but that is actually a reference to a very old response on the internet used when someone asks a question or says something that is explained fully inthe article. Ususlly this is expressed as RTFA or RTFM where M stands for manual. I did modify it for this since I did in fact write said artic
As I said in the fine article it is nothign to spend a couple of hundred dollars to have a lawyer read it for you. If $200 is too rich for someone they shouldn't be signing up for a freaking home loan for tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. They get what they deserve. As a society you have to expect a certain amount of due diligence from a consumer on massive expenditures. If they can't be bothered to read or have another read it for them ten I can't be bohered to
not always. thus the investigations and inquiries. Beleive me, people only are legally required to pay what they signed up to pay. There is no investigation if there is no contract. The CNN piece had nothing to do with people being asked to pay different rates than were on the contract. the piece was about subprime lenders and s
predators use deception and lie to achieve their means And yet the contract that people sign always have the terms right there in black and white.
It's still a deadly product, and must needs be regulated. And so mortgages are deadly products? Keep in mind that there is already a boatload of anti-usury legislation on the books limiting the maximum rates that lenders can charge and so on... These folks are simply signing into loans that are beyond their means to pay.
You can choose not to sign and have your brains blown out - it's still YOUR decision, you're forced to do nothing. Gee, generally most folks can see the difference between the threat of deadly force and a high-pressure sales pitch . Of course some people seem to have problems making the distinction. Perhaps we need leg