Neinhalt_Sieger

I get the feeling the changes were proposed almost only on substrate player feedback. they got their wish regarding cheap eco, macro and whatever they may think about it with the new patch. Medic is very slow and along with it whole phc economy as for the rank you are delusional if you think air was the sole reason for high rank. You may have the feeling that air was strong because at top tier you would get heavy air harass. Hades was supposed to be the on

Game feels very slow now with the latest changes, because economic damage is not viable anymore in early game. Hades is useless now to the point that it doesn't make any damage to resource points. Also 50 quanta engineer limits the gameplay very much with phc, because only few strats are possible and all involves ground units. I don;t know what to make of this patch, but overall it feels as a very huge nerf to phc.

metal is a very big problem for phc, at the point it's worth trading quanta for workers, but that will disappear with the proposed changes. what I try to argue is that sub did fine without harvesters but now is even worse, because harvesters scale better with infinite resources storage. Even if you are a lame player and forget about spending resources you can still recovers by mass producing from assemblies whatever horror you may think so as cost it's not an issue. res

Quesocito It's not that I am fanboy, I can play substrate the same I could play zerg or toss in starcraft. What I am trying to tell is that by design substrate is made to win games in a very "retard proof way". With this patch basically there are two scenarios: A) substrate gets twice as much nodes than phc in the

have you seen the speed of a zeus? really? and the ability to cap will be nerfed harder with slow medics. you dont need many workers when you can autobuild your economy from HQ.

Played some of the opt in and the game feels a little slow. I would suggest to make the harvester harder to produce, because substrate macro is insane now. It is better in current patch, but in opt in it destroys phc in economy: 1. harvesters produced non stop from nexus where as phc has to compromise between making defenses and refineries. 2. assembly is op and it allows much more flexibility than basic phc factory. 2 squad of martyrs can cap two nodes, two reap

The biggest factor is video card. I have a 4790k quad core and it's more than enough to handle AOS. Any I5 (Haswell and above) or Rizen can handle AOS and if you want performance you need a better video card. I don't have problems with 970 gtx and I don't see myself upgrading the system very time soon.

[quote who="GeneralsGentlemen" reply="35" id="3670654"] Punisher lethality in general is very high, which is why they are getting the shield increase (Which didn't come in yet.) But it's possible we over buffed them, I will do a bunch of testing over the next few days. This is exactly what the opt-in is for. [/quote] Keep in mind that Falcon has tripled his cost with the proposed changes and at that cost it should perform at starbust lvl. Both AA sub and phc should p

Starburst was very efficient in killing t3 bombers, but will not be anymore. I can assure you that you cannot scout the advanced building if they are behind AA. maybe you can by using quanta but no scout should be able to fly in a base at 15 min mark. There is another problem that comes with bombers and I hope Draginol reads this: - the quanta ability to jam orbitals it's not ok because it should block all orbitals not only the orbitals from the enemy <

[quote who="Quesocito" reply="21" id="3670464"] dude seriously... the patch hasnt even been released yet.. i dont understand how u can be so narrowminded.. the buffs to the AA and scouts are still coming.. [/quote] I insist now because I am as you say "narrowminded" but because there are units that cannot be handled in the current patch, that will be easier to produce in the next patch and the problem still remains. As far as I am concerne

[quote who="GeneralsGentlemen" reply="9" id="3670407"] Scout units have received a massive buff and are now available from the Nexus. Players now have the tools to properly scout their opponents and adapt. If you lose to a Heavy Bomber Rush with how potent anti-air defenses and interceptors are, it's your own fault for not scouting. [/quote] I have seen T3 bomber rush under the current patch and it does help you with anything. AA defen

[quote who="DasUnding" reply="26" id="3670363"] #1 Artillery Post projecile speed greatly lowered Artillery Post accuracy reduced Artillery Post Range lowered from 3500 to 3000 Artillery Post Damaged lowered from 300 to 250 I think if you do this it will be total crap. In the games

[quote who="DasUnding" reply="3" id="3670366"] Movement speed reduced to that of Brute -that is not a good idead it will lower the cap speed of sentries and hermes... instead plz fix your group system which was best one iteration before the current system "v" should force the units to handle together which now is simply not the case. It is horrible it's not fire and foreget its baby

Call Engineer Call Engineer is too cheap for how much value it can provide. Quanta cost increased from 30 to 50 Please increase cost of the Avatar in the same way. While the drop engineer is useful is by no means comparable to avatar so I beg to reconsider Advanced Sky Factory Now only requires Air Factory

I think there are problems with the way PHC can deal with tier 3 bombers and there are even some bugs involved. - biggest problem is the t3 AA which is underwhelming to say the least, 4 of those big boys can't shot even a bomber. I can't even dare to compare it with substrate t3 AA splash damage - the other problem is a bug that allows phc bombers to kill air units with splash ex: I get 6 bombers incoming and I send all my air to deal with it and

I can argue that you have no idea what you are talking about. There is a counter to medics but I guess you have to play more to learn the game.

substrate outplay. moving punisher to gateway requirement is a good thing.

technically you don't understand anything out of substrate gameplay and most of the sub players in ladder too. You really don't get it but if you play long enough you will get it. any combat in open ground without orbitals being used should end in sub's favor, if it doesn't is basically substrate fault regardless of phc player skill. if you haven't reached that point that means you haven't played enough and you can't understand basic substrate gamep

[quote who="Ekko_Tek" reply="15" id="3668539"] Quoting Neinhalt_Sieger, reply 12 in 2.10, 6 arties cannot counter one tier 3 turret backed by a generator. in terms of costs sub destroys phc in any kind of static defense. Lol - in terms of cost, I would hope 6 Artem

in 2.10, 6 arties cannot counter one tier 3 turret backed by a generator. in terms of costs sub destroys phc in any kind of static defense.

Well Phc artilery is kind of useless now!

Sub design is better and overall retarded when compared with phc. I see after a long pause that phc is reduced on making mass athena just to survive, while sub always outnumbers phc in cruisers because of the mineral only imbalanced design of assembly. Artilery is reduced to nothing and punisher still reigns supreme in mid game. The heavy amount of cheap aa of sub and the way phc air works makes for a imbalanced head on battle in early and mid game f

Poblem is that sub have two tier 3 aa with aoe vs only one tier 3 aa phc who lacks aoe and its mad expensive.

Call engineer 50 quanta is too much, almost on avatar level. Also I have played some games lately and phc aa is underpowered compared to sub one. The problem is not single damage but lack of aoe dps. Trying to kill 4 strategic bombers requires 10× the investment in resources, in order to have a chance to survive. So phc aa lacks aoe and is very expensive for what it does.

So if I want to make some fancy play and stockpile rad fast as phc, I simply press the quanta button and -85 quanta is taken away and may proceed to lose the game So please fix this bug. It only occurs if the first thing you try is to increase rad storage!