ICO appears to be working normally; if you are still having this issue, please open a ticket with support if you haven't: https://esupport.stardock.com/index.php?/default_import/Tickets/Submit
kryo
Try running as administrator.
It was a Windows tablet. Same version of the game as anywhere else. (And also four years ago) :)
Once all video streaming has shifted over to HTML5, they'll have a hard time justifying Flash's continued existence to anyone but the Facebook games crowd. High past time too. Adobe's grasp of secure development is quite possibly the worst of any company with software so widely used.
I wouldn't read more into the accountant/executive-speak than is really there. Microsoft is notoriously bad at communication to begin with, so there is usually less there than it sounds like, even in normal-speak. Simply put, they intend to make money on new license sales. Upgrades have never been a significant source of revenue, so this is not a new thing for them. For purposes of projections, they have to make an estimate of how often consumers will buy new devices. Thos
We only offer our own titles. You will need to deal with GameStop support if you are having any issues with any non-Stardock titles purchased through Impulse.
We are not planning on doing a retail box/DVD in North America. Regional distributors may do them in their areas as usual, but that's up to them.
The core features are in the base game now (blank hulls, symmetry, and offsets). The fake hulls and modules are the only thing that is absent now, really, so I haven't made a new mod for GC3.
Did you save your game too after creating them? Do they appear on a new game? Games in progress store a lot of the game's data internally in the save game, rather than loading it in.
You may have registered it in the past and forgotten, if you played it before. If you contact [email protected] they can help locate your original registration.
The expansions are no longer sold separately. Trinity is the same price as the pair would be anyway, and it's standalone so you don't need the original game from any particular place to get it.
You should be able to just log on to store.stardock.com with the same account you used before and get it from the downloads page there.
It didn't make it for the final release, but should be back later.
They're separate installs, so there is nothing stopping you from having them all on at once if you're so inclined. LH is just the only one for which you'll get a Steam key. The others did not use Steamworks so they are only available off the Stardock store downloads page, if you got them from us. Note, FE/LH do not have multiplayer.
ICO appears to be up. If you are still having connection issues, please contact support.
If you're toggling opt-in build channels on and off, yes, Steam downloads the different files every time.
User folders aren't installed, the game generates them when it runs if they aren't present. If you're having trouble getting the game to start, contact [email protected] and they should be able to help.
[quote]This forum has no SSL/TLS security, even though it takes usernames and passwords. Should be fixed ASAP.[/quote] The login occurs over HTTPS. You can confirm that yourself by checking the javascript or using an intercept proxy.
You can add it to Steam to be able to launch it, but not to download. Though if you just don't want to use GameStop at all, you can download the game right off the Stardock store website as it is.
Hold middle mouse button/wheel and move the mouse.
[quote who="Vidszhite" reply="3" id="3554573"]Does this mean we can't add custom stats at all?[/quote] Any case involving enums tied to behaviors, assume no, since that's the way most of them are and those require code support. Cases where the enum doesn't really have any special meaning (like hull types) may work, depending on how they're implemented in the game.
Maybe I'm crazy, but if I did not enjoy a game I would sure as hell not spend 90 hours on it trying to disprove the theory. That's way past 'good money after bad' and deep into masochism. Heck, even games I like I rarely play that much...
Might be helpful if they actually bothered to retract their original posting so they don't continue to hype people up over nothing...
[quote]Odd, since it comes from several sources...junk if one, perhaps, but it appears in more than one, and was quite specific as to temperature.[/quote] It doesn't come from multiple sources. They all cite the same blog post (that example of specific temperatures is lifted straight from it), which has one anecdote and zero evidence that the JEDEC end-of-life SSD data retention specifications have anything to do with that anecdote. One news outlet (IBT UK apparently) published th
[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="6" id="3554526"]The presentation was a few months ago...not years ago, had anyone been troubled to look at the zdnet article...[/quote] The article cites a computer security contractor's blog post from March, which cites the presentation from 2012 as the reason for an anecdotal case of a drive appearing corrupt after three months. There is no discussion of the drive's age, or how it was handled (other than that no particular attenti