Thanks you two for the quick response!
Gengsta
"C" also centers on selected ships.
Anyone familiar with naval command structure?? Care to spout off the command hierarchy? Is there some ranking officer called the XO?
That was a record-tying seven posts in a row, Hurley.
I'll have to try that diplomatic approach.
Looks like I lost the touch for even small masochistic maps. I've lost eight in a row. Managed to take out the strongest race each time and then hit the wall.
[quote] my people who will start calling me Nasty [/quote] you can always destroy the colony - it's in the details screen
[quote] I have the feeling that there are not enough events in my games to allow me to reach such moral heights. ;) [/quote] Just build a few extra colony ships put 1 mil pop on them and colonize planets to up your alignment. I've noticed negative modifiers usually do not stack. Since 13 and 14 colonies are viable if you can put soil enhancers and habitant improvements on them quickly.
[quote] By the way Hawaii I'm trying to earn this "very good" little icon as well, but I think it's making my games a bit more complicated... [/quote] I think your average alignment needs to be above 85 or so. You'll need a few 100's to pull it up there.
[quote]But I also second Ray's suggestion for starbase governors. Even in smaller games, there is a lot of constructors going around! [/quote] Especially on smaller maps. Production bonuses and Trade bonuses are so essential on the smaller maps. Every extra bit of income and production matters a great deal.
there might be an line break problem, too. :) If you make a word way too long like edit: no more need for the example - the page was stretched too wide - you can see it in effect with WEEEE! it ends up stretching the page [Message Edited] [Message Edited]
The button is in javascript. Unless you have a browser that allows javascript to fill form fields, it doesn't work. I've tried to get Mozilla to use the quote button, but the program does not allow javascript to do anything of the sort. You'll have to do it manually. just type: [quote] text [⁄quote]
Used MeriodacII instead of Ithilien II once. Foolish me. Too late to edit now. Just make the switch. (edit: too hasty the first time around) [Message Edited]
Galactic Discoveries Edge of a Galactic Core Barry Light monitored the progress of Bridge toward their destination. Barry flipped through the ship maintenance data, scanned comminication bands, and brought up the sensor reports. Everything was proceeding just fine, just like an hour ago, just like two hours ago, and just like three hours ago. For two months, he watched the same data scroll across his console several hundred times, and none of it was out of the ord
There are some bonuses that should not be passed up lightly A + 30+% PQ bonus. A + 30+% production on 22+ PQ planet. A + 45+% starship bonus on 25+ PQ planet. A + 50+% research on 22+ PQ planet. There are some penalties that just cannot be accepted A -33% moral penalty A -30+% productivity penalty on 19+ PQ planets A -20+% PQ penalty Other choices should be made according to your game plan.
Ray, the Fellowship thread is already growing at a remarkable speed. I wonder how long it will take to hit 1000 posts. I think we blew by 500 without noticing it. Either that or I was inattentive.
Miles, that one song will be included in GNN installment of the WotW - it doesn't quite fit as a rally song, but is good for persuading aliens of the cultural superioriyt of the Fellowship. I wonder if J4 will be around to provide more GNN excerpts.
Thanks Miles. That's great. I'm copying now. You'll probably see in the next week. Credits to you in that section of the WotW.
Part five of WotW should be finished tomorrow. I wrote this one with lightning speed and during broken sessions so there probably are some incohesive passages.
They really should have those, it really helps out the AI, which really needs help with starbase management. I want to see a more flexible AI teching rather than fixed evaluation of techs. AIs with merchantile party should value trade techs more. Builder AIs like Arceans and Altarians should evaluate the tech tree according to their strategy. The deflector tech is extremely overvalued. I'm going to cheat now and submit another suggestion. Traded techs should be acquire
Not exactly who - the nominative case, subject of verbs, thing acting Who is the greediest race in GC? - correct Who did this? - correct Who kicked the ball? whom - object of transitive verbs, object of prepositions, thing acted upon or thing action is directed at Whom did I trip? - object of 'trip' Arceans, whom I destroyed, have nice yellow eyes. - object of 'destroyed' To whom was the message sent? - object of 'to' TJL1s sentence ca
whom - the dative/accusative case for denoting an unknown person definitely used after prepositions eg. - dative case for whom to whom dative case is used as the object of prepositions accusative case is used as the object of transitive verbs in English the two cases are simplified into the objective case [Message Edited]
Ok here's a guess: < > ok it's & lt and & gt [Message Edited] [Message Edited]
are you using them in pairs? less than followed by greater than? That is html coding. the other way isn't > there is a way to print them using special codes, but I don't remember what they are. [Message Edited]
The Mule_ can you describe what you are doing in great detail?