That is the topic. Let's debate that, and not another topic which can be debated in another blog that you are free to create. I agree...granted I am bit biased towards Bush...but if we consider those who want Kerry (secretly or otherwise) to win...dont we ourselves an honest evaluation as to why?
couchman
This is the second part of my article.........lets continue with those for Kerry shall we and my colorful biased memo's Germany: In a statement by Gert Weisskirchen, foreign policy expert for the ruling Social Democratic Party, "...I cannot imagine that there will be any change in our decision not to send troops, whoever becomes president. That
Several months after John Kerry pompously boasted of having received secret endorsements for president from "un-named" foreign leaders....finally some light has shown through into the darkness...revealing an intresting if not unbalanced(in numbers) group....the following should say alot bout a candidate...wonder if anyone cares....I'm writing this in 2 part
However, I still don't think the small group of people you encountered at a meeting is demonstrative of a very diverse group of people, most of whom, you have never met. Once again your wearing bliners.....first off the where was NYC during the GOP convention....the "small" number of people you refer to
AS TO ANSWER AND MOVEON.ORG....BOTH TWO FACES OF THE SAME COIN...I HAVE ATTENDED THEIR ANTI-WAR PROTESTS AS PART OF A SMALL BUT GROWING PRO-WAR/PRO-US/PRO-GOV GROUPS....THE LEFT WAS ANYTHING BUT CIVIL,FRIENDLY, PEACEFUL, RESPECTFUL(NOTHING LIKE HAVING AN AMERICAN FLAG GIVEN TO US BY A LOCAL VETRANS GROUP TORN OUT OF HANDS AND RIPPED AND SET ON FIRE TO MAKE ME FEEL THEY ARE AMERICANS) SORRY...BUT THE ANTI-WAR/ANTI-US LEFT HAS DONE NOTHING BUT SHOW HOW M
I was sufing the net when I popped on to Victor D. Hansons site..as I usually do.... when I ran across this story he wrote...as an observation...its fairly good...even it some may disagree with it...I do think he does pose some basic question we sould ask ourselves where this Anti-Americanism began...for it surely didnt start with president Bush's election in 2000 nor
lol...good one nicky....and a very true possibility
Spain has not 'lost'. Spain has won new found respect for doing what it believes is right despite bullying from it's american neighbours and name calling. First off....the US didnt bully Spain....nor did Spain get on one knee and bow...well not quite.....former PM Aznars goverment knew full well and und
The cease-fire Spain bought from the Islamo-fascist terrorists...paid for with their capitulation after the Madrid bombings seems to be constucted entirely of tissue paper.....though no offical document was ever signed...no summit held....the Socialist party and Spanish electorate in general chose to look back in Europes past and pick the one course of action that hi
And, frankly, insulting people is a poor way to advertise your book, which, frankly, is the whole point, isn't it? very true baker..... But remember for the left....they equate ones intelligence with the amount of education they recieved....which has led them to become more arrogant and an
Last night in the second Presidential debate Kerry, again, said that the uS had 90% of the casualties, ignoring Iraqi forces, again. Bush didn't call him on it, but he should have. true......... While the 90% casualty rate cited by Kerry is wrong....The US does have the lions share of cas
WHAt a bunch of wankers. wine drinking, cork manufaturing surrender monkeys SSG Geezer....lol...concise and to the point...and i agree
Since October 0f 2001, in an effort to pay homage to those who died in the 9/11 attacks and solidarity with the U.S., Spain's goverment has invited American troops to join them in marching in their national holiday parade (the date on which Christopher Columbus' sighting land on his first westward journey)...but not any longer.... But since then a new Soci
Thanks BakerStreet.... wonder what verbal fuckups Kerry will make next...I mean that who arrogant idea that he will hold summits to find a few hundred thousand troops to replace US forces in Iraq from nations who said categoricly they wont deploy troops to iraq no matter what (france/germany) or the nations that he said have only commited a few hundred troops here or there (uk, poland,ukraine, etc)...Kerry sickens me..pompous egotistical basta
Even before the Iraq war, the Democrats and the left in general have been using a rather intresting line to make their talking points seem that much better that the usual "useful idiot" logic....now of course it has become the staple of their speeches, interviews, and political peep rallies.....Before no one really paid much attention when it was said..mostly because
Please post where Bush ever said "immediate" please. I know he siad a few other things but never "immediate". But I could be wrong too. I'm just interested where this phrase came from. Lee..Bush never said it..what was said is that we must act before Iraq becomes an Immenant threat...the left lik
The planet you're on views only the navy and airforce and ignores boot soldiers--the national guard and reservists are in deep trouble. Hate to disagree again but you are wrong once more...first off after 9-11 the military using emergency war powers increased the authorized size of the force by 35,000.
His films deal with themes like gun control and thought control which are ignored. gee isnt gun control a dem/left issue... Moores movie however has been discredit by critics from both sides of the political spectrum....Moore doesnt mind ...thanks to those to believe his thoughts/lies...he's ge
Wow! The American education system has let you down badly, couchman hmm...lets see..typo's ...well shit...guess an article isnt worth your "great" time if there not perfect...furry ...get fucked
Very good article....and no...Kerry's remark bout giving Iran fissionable material didnt slip by me...I just cant believe the media (which for the most part is left leaning) is letting him go on that.....now while kerry did better in the first debate than was expected and bush was somewhat okay.....Kerrys gains will be insignificant as the gop hammers Kerry on what he said during the debate...which I already started seeing...... With regards t
Fandy, supposedly quoting from an undisclosed number of unidentified Iranians to back his position. Furry....wow...you are extremely naive...that or maybe all Iranian citizens just love their goverment....too bad bout 65% of Iranians are under 35 years old and despise their goverment .....but lets say t
Furry, I will call you crazy. Think! Cant agree more Hit.....
You are assuming draftees would be on the same pay scale as career personnel; on the contrary, they would be paid much less and single eliminating the cost of family support and housing. Besides, I'm saying that the draft is but a last resort when as currently there is a problem in recruiting and dwindling re-enlistment. Moreove
Actually....total end strength for US military..including Active duty, reserves, and guard is roughly bout 3 million+.......secondly...you erroneously stated that our all-volunteer force is drasticly higher in cost than a draft force...that is pure bunk...do some research....a conscript force is far more expensive to maintain...due in part to the high turnover rate of troops and the need to constantly re-train new personnel......currently only 2 politi
The following is a story by Banafshed Zand-Bonazzi for FrontPageMag.com that was posted a few days. The story is an intresting bit of reporting...the kind thats very rarely reported by the general media here and abroad.....if even part of the story is correct....it does signal some good news out of Iran....but thats just my opinion..... By Banafshe