I'm somewhat amazed by the lack of intrest in this growing crisis....or perhaps the problem is that JU tends to have a high turnover rate on newly posted articles....who knows...but this issue needs bit of debate...........
couchman
one wonders since both Russia and China have ecconomic intrests in Sudan...can France and Germany be far behind with their own ecconomic intrests there...and if so...then the rouges gallery of the Axis of Weasels has reared its ugly head again....and I cant say I'm not suprised!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The following is an Op-Ed in the New York Times by David Brooks regarding the UN's action or in-action over the growing situation in Sudan. And so we went the multilateral route. Confronted with the murder of 50,000 in Sudan, we eschewed all that nasty old unilateralism, all that hegemonic, imperialist, go-it-alone, neocon, empir
couchman, i did read and reply to your post. Please re-read my reply. You'll note that the shell was used as an explosive bomb and not as a chemical weapon. This is a clear indication that whoever found that shell had NO concept of what it was or how to use it, and rigged it as an explosive device. If they had known what it wa
1 single shell that did contain chemical weapons is NOT a legal arguement that Saddam violated 1441. Solitair..... not quite old chap....try re-reading my post again....but here we go in big bold letters for you.... 1) THE 155MM ARTILLERY SHELL USED AS PART OF AN IED WAS IN FACT FILLED WITH
None huh??? You think that 155 mm howitzer shell with *SARIN* gas appeared out of no where? And that was *after* Oct 2002! I'd like to add that the 155mm arty shell was one of 550 listed as "destroyed" by the former regime/UN inspections....another point I'd add is it contained cyclosarin which is far m
*meh, sorry couchman for being a bit off-topic . . . felt good to rant, though* My lady you have no need to appologise to me or anyone else.....I am honored by your husbands service to our country and yet sad that he was required to leave you for deployment.... As to your neighbor, sounds like
You're an idiot. lol.....now why didnt I write that...lol.....
hmm, strange to see some of these old articles resurfacing. Hmmmmm....must be that "evil" right-wing conspiracy we all heard bout but never shown proof of......maybe it was the "source from CBS's fuckup in reporting.....or maybe it was the shadow....cause the Shadow knows!
GREAT ANALYSIS OF THE TWO COWARDLY HUMANS (I WONT CALL THEM AMERICANS) AND OUR TURNCOAT NEIGHBOR TO THE NORTH Calling them humans is streatching it abit.....although gutless, moral cowards does some justice
we live our life and evertytime i hear that there is a mother fucking American or Filthy , smelly Jews who get brutally slaughtered by the ARABS(God Bless Their ASSES) we get happy upon hearing the news.and that's that.May Allah continue to Bless the fucking Muslims.( Amen, Amen amen) Hey fucknutz....ne
ibm selectric machines were capable of superscripting like that according to my sister who typed 100s of dissertations using one during the years 1969-1972. proportional font elements were not terribly exotic. Not quite....a few select models came out in early 70's...bout 72' onward...second...to ma
Interesting how, when you can't argue a point, you shift the argument. All this time we have been discussing Soviet influence in the Third World and all of a sudden you change it to anti-US groups in the west, without actually stating which groups they might be. again when did i drift into goverments...
Germany never attacked us: Japan did." Germany declared war on us after Japan attacked. ...Some relevant historical facts...while it is true Germany never attacked us at pearl and that Japan did...and Germany subsequently declared war on us later....you miss the key point that Japan never informe
DAMM I knew bill gates was behind it all..lol.... so...when the reports are proven a fake...will cbs give a 10 min appology to the president ? or will they most likely gloss over it ????
What group's are you talking about? I find it hard to believe that the USSR would have to infiltrate governments that were actively asking for their help. Not...umm where did i say goverments?...the Soviets infiltraited and directed anti-us groups in the west....suggest once more you take a reality che
except in the case of Eastern Europe and the Middle East, there was no infiltration Suggest you do bit more of research there....the fact that anti-US groups with ties to the KGB and its soviet bloc proxies is a reality...facts to back this up are KGB files withing their archives opened up or leaked to
I hate to add it but 350 more reasons the global War on Terrorism must be fought and must me won...by any means....while the act is deplorable...it is not without precident...Palestinian Suicide Bombers have killed many children in their campaign against Israel for one.... Maybe some good may come out of this tragedy...maybe not....as the future is never predetermined and many paths lie ahead of us..some good some bad...few in between
The Left is a rainbow mix of different groups who are committed to a wide array of issues and who deploy a wide array of tactics. Among them include Buddhists and Quakers and other pacifists who would NEVER engage in violence against counter-protestors. Well I'm intrested in the several polls taken of t
These were essentially the wars and problems of Central America. The Soviets gave aid, but never to the extent and with as much direct interference as the US. Gee must have missed the cuban advisors in south and central america....the cubans were the soviets proxies in this region of the world and as s
Lol....Gideon....I always like your articles and responses....I'm not disappointed I see by your latest article...... The only thing Moore has a finger on is his ability to make lies, half-truths, and ineuendo commercially sucessful to an extent.. Personaly, I tried a few times to disect Moore's beliefs (political, artistic, etc) and the only thing I did was receive a major headache....and kept going in circles..... Frankly I
The USSR was an agressive militaristic empire. Thank goodness it's gone - no thanks to the naivete of the far left protesters like the ones we saw in NY last week. Draginol.....I have to agree whole heartedly with your statement..... <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF39
A line from the RNC convention says it best bout Kerry's problem...."He (kerry) would have to do a google search to find out where he currently stands on an issue!" I forget who said it but it is prob the best overall political statement in a while..... Dick Gephart or Joseph Lieberman were far more qualified candidates for the dems to run....I may strongly disagree with them but atleast
just because a country was under communist control, did not mean that it bent to the will of the USSR. Please tell that to all the members of the eastern eurpean countries...I'm sure they will (not) agree with you <
There's a hollywood "elite right" too. Eswiv..... Two sticky points on that....one is that the hollywood celeb right is low key when you compare it to the left.....partly because of the treatment many have gotten at industry parties and the like......another is that the Hollywood left far outnu