Neil Banfield

Neil Banfield

Joined Last seen Member # 689
0 Posts 252 Replies 34,200 Reputation

If the drivers stop reporting it at higher resolutions then the drivers must have decided the card is either too slow to support it at those resolutions, or it has too little video ram, or its a bug. It might be worth your while trying newer & older drivers and possibly contacting Gigabyte for assistance.

6 Replies 4,963 Views

This is a bug in the Sun Java Virtual Machine. It is not fully compatible with Windows XP or 2000. If there is a newer JVM download from Sun then try installing it. If not then if the Java app you use can run using the Microsoft JVM then that JVM is XP & 2000 compatible.

1 Replies 1,493 Views

Did you set a PNG as your wallpaper? Those enable active desktop and the original wallpaper will still be 'under' it. The preview in wbconfig is not aware of active desktop wallpapers and neither is the taskbar transparency. I would strongly advise against using active desktop anyway due to its incompatibility with the icon shadows feature in XP. The window frame transparency is fully aware of everything thats under it and it even works over videos (when not i

2 Replies 2,823 Views

Your Radeon 7200 series will not do the per pixel alpha that WB needs. ATI cards from the 9500 up will support it ok and should work with vista too. So any card from ATI which says it supports Pixel Shaders 2.0, 2.0b or 3.0.

2 Replies 9,456 Views

Jonathan: The z order issues are a bug in the OS itself. We have a reproducable test case for this now and will be passing the information over to Microsoft in the hopes that they will fix it. We are currently looking into if the later versions of Windows (2003 server & XP 64 bit) suffer from this problem or not.

10 Replies 5,247 Views

What app are you using to remote connect? WB should automatically disable per pixel support when over remote desktop.

2 Replies 2,717 Views

Given that even wbconfig is corrupted, it points to a video driver / video hardware problem. The icons in wbconfig for example seem to be shifted out of place. Its certainly not WB at fault. Drop hardware acceleration on the display properties->Advanced->troubleshooting tab and reboot and I suspect all will be fine. What graphics card do you have?

3 Replies 2,087 Views

Are you sure you are using the latest build on OD? There was a bug in menubar painting which caused it to paint odd things in the menubar with some skins, but this should be fully resolved with the latest build on OD. On the card, the good news is the ATI card should handle WB better in terms of speed & I believe it should also be compatible with Windows Vista when it is released.

3 Replies 5,534 Views

I should point out that the software is BETA. This means it might not work, it might crash, hang, it could even cause you to have to reinstall. Now its unlikely the reinstall issue would happen, but crashes etc are normal for Beta releases. I doubt your problem is anything to do with your VGA card or motherboard. Most likely explorer hung on skin apply and you just need to kill it using taskmanager & restart it. If it still happens then we would want to kno

76 Replies 55,007 Views

Andy02369: A lot of the more advanced FPS games released in the past year would take advantage of pixel shaders which your card does not support. They may run in a less graphically advanced mode though depending on the game. I have a feeling DOOM3 for example would just not run at all as its OpenGL and the early ATI OpenGL drivers were not good. If you are interested in running WB5 per pixel frames, I would be on the lookout for a dirt cheap 9500 or higher card. They

128 Replies 58,417 Views