GalCiv2 Forums://images.stardockcentral.net/images/smiles/smile.gif" border=0 ALIGN="absmiddle">
22 Replies
28,976 Views
IAMJME
0
Posts
0
Replies
61
Reputation
Stardock Forums[quote]I am concerned about the number of requests focusing on the military aspects - Ships/weapons etc. I do not want Civilizations becoming Galactic Warfare instead.[/quote] I too am becoming concerned with the amount of extra features (units, abilities and such) that are being requested. i think many of these updates should be optional and like the many updates found on this site through the library. :( :notsure: :D
192 Replies
50,176 Views
[quote]According to the game manual each square is one cubic light year.(or square light year.)Our own system which has 9 planets (way more than anything in the game)is only 320 light minutes in size(radius) so the planets have to be in the same square as the star.[/quote] don't you think thats just nit picking. i think visible planets is the best thing since sliced bread. >:( :notsure: :D
192 Replies
50,176 Views
I think dipolmacy is greatly undervalued in gal civ1. the UP offers no real imrovements other than the ability to trade with other civs. UP issues should be like SMAC where one every so many turns issues can be raised depending on the concensus of the galaxy. the ability to combine research with allied civs would be nice. allowing the increase of trade routes with allies would also be nice. this would give more depth to the game and would allow similarly alligned civs to work together for thier
192 Replies
50,176 Views