#13 by Skinner kona0197 - 6/24/2004 12:26:16 AM Nothing wrong with IE... I guess ignorance is bliss. Once I (we) finish ironing our some compatibility and porting issues with mission critical web apps, I'm deploying FireFox 1.0 enterprise-wide. Eve
Orion
It also addressed the problems with Symantec Antivirus Corp. Edition 9.0 not working. From what I've seen with RC1 and now RC2 in our test lab, I'll be deploying it to my enterprise upon release. They aren't kidding when they say this is the most significant SP ever.
Yes, quite normal behavior as Chris described, but I know many people that have soiled their pants over this issue. On a side note, if you're using SAVCE from work and you can't set it to do auto (daily) updates, your IT person gave you the wrong client install. What you want is an "unmanaged" client at home.
#59 by China♥Cat - 5/23/2004 1:26:17 AM Zy-Ban (Wellbutrin) is very expensive Kona. And it has a pretty nasty effect if you're allergic to it. But it does work. The best way to go is Cold Turkey and tons of Jolly Ranchers Do-IT! Only by name brand...which most insurance won't cover. ...and only depending on how you look at i
Never. I've used my contantly-evolving skin since the very beginning (1999?).
Q: Do you smoke after sex? A: I dunno, I never looked... One word...Zyban (Welbutrin). It makes it SO much easier. Good luck. [Message Edited]
FileZilla is a great (and free) client. http://sourceforge.net/projects/filezilla For a server, I'd use Bulletproof or IIS (as stated by others). Personally, I really don't even see much of a real need for FTP anymore. I only use a client because all the linux distros and a few other things I access still insist on using that protocol.
#11 by Frogboy - 5/21/2004 11:11:36 AM stats: downloads 246 MEGABYTES. Man, I've been a member since the begining and I've only downloaded 176MB. I guess I'm picky.
The worst I''ve ever had to do is close Firefox and re-open it. Are you sure there still isn''t an instance of it running? Check the task manager''s "process" tab and see if "firefox.exe" is in the list. If so, that may be a contributing factor. [Message Edited]
Hiding the taskbar by other means (other than "hide windows taskbar") in the ObjectDock properties, will not help your problem. ObjectDock consumes 0% CPU when it's just sitting there, but it does use some CPU when I'm hovering across it. How "rediculously slow" is your processor? Memory also is a big factor. No so much how much OD uses, but how much is available and how much time the system has to spend time swaping out to virtual memory. I've also seen several instances of various dockle
https://www.wincustomize.com/msgboard.asp?BID=WC&id=272983#273216
http://www.betanews.com/article.php3?sid=1060997150 Late July is the best I think we could expect...a little bird told me [Message Edited]
TB storage has been around for some time. The interrupt 13 extentions from six or seven years ago allows for up to 9TB in the firmware support of basic pc hardware operations. As far as NTFS, the defacto stardard (practical) limit is 2TB. NTFS was designed to support file systems up to 16EB (Exabytes)...at least in theory.
Is your system in an NT or AD domain? What OS are you using? What's the airspeed velocity of an un-laden swallow? What is the exact symptom/error you're experiencing?
There are some screenshots of the OB 2.0 interface in the stardock.od.windows.objectbar newsgroup.
I really miss the high level of moderation. I really appreciated when the level of acceptance was so high. I've almost commented on the same thing several times (after browsing the wall library), but I guess you got fed-up with it before I did. Admins, please don't take this as a bash, because it's not you people do a great job. I just miss the higher standard. Call me a hard-@$$, but I'd even like t
Don`t give up. A decent book would go a long way. If you have no command-line, file system, or networking experience I`m not sure where to point you. I take a lot for granted after being a propeller-head (as Jafo calls us ) for more than 25 years and a systems/network admin for 17 of those. I once had a C for Windows book (for Dummies) and it actually helped put things in a way that I could relate to whe
Here`s one. http://www.unicorntech.net/pages/nutalk.htm It is supposed to to work on all windows versions. There`s a bunch out there.
If you`re using Stardock Central, you don`t need to worry about it. If not, I don`t know.
Look in the lower-left corner of my desktop screenshot in my profile. If that`s what you`re looking for, it`s called CoolMon. http://coolmon.arsware.org/
Where can I find tutorials on VI? The intarweb is a good place to start. There''s this new thing...it`s really cool...it`s called a search engine. It lets you search for things. Like "Linux VI tutorial" <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgCo
#13 by uM0p ap!sdn - 4/24/2004 12:58:52 PM Again I ask, which distro for a newbie and why? "It`s the easiest for a beginner..." doesn`t say much for me. I`m partial to RedHat. I like the GUI installation. The other reason is I`m simply more used to RH and it`s structure and behavior than the other distros I`ve used. <TABLE cellpadding
#10 by Admin Jafo - 4/24/2004 2:19:33 AM ...and it`s all about the journey, not the destination.... True...and very profound. They should adopt that as the Linux tag-line. <TD class="mb-
#6 by uM0p ap!sdn - 4/23/2004 4:29:25 PM It''''s not about wanting the lastest. I want to learn the basics first, but have a distro that will provide the options to do more w/o installing a different OS. That''s not how it works. You can pretty much add whatever you want to any distro. Just download the tarball for the feature or server you wa
I believe the IP section is pooched right now.