[quote who="Wintersong" reply="164" id="2643247"] Sorry, couldn't resist.[/quote] No need to apologize, I think it's pretty funny. Even if it's a huge bullshit.
TucoBenedicto
[quote who="BoogieBac" reply="153" id="2642095"] And Tuco, if you've seen Dwarf Fortress, you know that there are gamers that genuinely don't care about graphics. They aren't fanboyz, or sheep...they just know the worth of a solid gameplay experience.[cut] Don't hold back your criticism of the game, but try not to criticize other forum goers Thanks! [/quote] I've played Dwarf Fortress myself but that's not the point. I'm not denying h
[quote who="_PawelS_" reply="146" id="2641916"]I think the current screenshots look better that the one posted by TucoBenedicto. Somehow I don't like the use of colors on it.[/quote] Well, I don't. Really. In fact, to me is even hard to understand how THIS... ...can be perceived as better than this:
[quote who="Naithin" reply="145" id="2641915"]If it's the whole 'Illustrative style' you don't like, I don't think any amount of modding will get around that unfortunately.[/quote] No, isn't. In fact, I love the "illustrative style". I've even just posted an early concept screenshot praising its visual style. Which isn't coming in the game anymore, sadly. What i don't like are very bad polygonal models (starting with the Sovereigns himself), human units in the beta, and very b
[quote who="Tormy-" reply="143" id="2641906"]*facepalm* [/quote] Jesus Christ, it's pretty annoying trying to debate with raging fanboys.
[quote who="blk_sheep2004" reply="141" id="2641894"]Wow, i really get your point regarding graphics and stuff... But i just think you pre-ordered the wrong game.[/quote] Yeah, right. I'm 32 years old, I play games (every damn videogame genre, to be more specific) since i was five, and now looks like you want to teach me what game is right for me. [quote]There are enough people around that would risk diabetes considering the eye candy they need in their games, but this isn't
[quote who="Frogboy" reply="130" id="2638997"]Sorry esrever, I wasn't meaning to address you quite so specifically. What I am trying to address is the general question of the graphical style. We don't like the tendancy of these types of games to be littered with "stuff". We prefer having a cleaner look both from a game play point of view as well as aesthetically.[/quote] Well, let's be honest. This was one your very early concept screens: <img src="http://www.1up.c
Wow, what an embarassing bunch of Captain Obvious Superfriends we have here.
[quote who="Tormy-" reply="93" id="2637488"] PS. I am not trying to change the subject at all. Gameplay > Graphics in my "book of magic". [/quote]And yet you are still changing it. What's wrong with you? No one here is putting graphics before gameplay but we were speaking about the graphics engine and the overall looking of the game, so your priority list is pointless here. Please, stop trying to act like the old, experienced player who's taming the young and silly g
[quote who="Tormy-" reply="81" id="2637245"] Well, EWoM's gfx/art style is quite unique, that's a fact....it's not for "everyone". Some people surely won't like it. Personally I like the art style, however....gameplay > gfx. So, why do you care at all?[/quote] Cause I always care about how a good game looks, and, by the way, speaking about good gameplay you are just changing subject. [quote]Personally I like the art style[/quote] Personally I liked much mo
To be honest I really don't like most of the graphics so far, especially human units. I was wondering how much of this is placeholder and how much is pretty much final. P.S. I'm not talking about these screenshots up there, I'm referring to all new screenshots availbale today, even on IGN preview.
[quote who="Savyg" reply="48" id="2629549"]I think we'll see the distribution market shift a bit now that they're plastering Mac feature ads all over. I just made my last Steam purchase unless something changes there.[/quote] Well, actually I think this will just make their position stronger. They are going on a virgin videogame market where customers are kinda of happy to throw away money for cool stuff. And they are planning Steam on Linux too, which
I have far less problems with Steamworks than with that unbelievable pile of shit called Games for Windows Live, so it's ok for me. Sorry for Stardock, by the way. maybe they must try to push Impulse Recator more strongly, almost fiercely. OR they can try to look for a collaboration with Valve, finding a way which allows them to offer Steamwork-based titles.
I prefer those FPS where you actually need to aim at your target. So no console stuff for me. In fact, I fiercely hate Bioshock... just to say one.
Jagged Alliance 2.
Well, my PC is worsse than yours and I play it fine enough... But your videocard isn't really that good.
[quote] I'm not sure what you mean here? Ignoring the masterful piece of design work that is the VATS combat system - essentially real-time turn based strategy in first person with guns (and they said it couldn't be done!) - how exactly does Fallout 3 not capture the feeling of the originals, while updating it to modern production values?[/quote] Beside the fact I didn
[quote]I currently can't play dwarf fortress because of how I anticipate how awesome the version after it will be.[/quote] Any useful link about it? By the way, give me a "visual" version of this game, with a proper mouse support, GUI, and so on, and I will be an happy gamer for YEARS.
"Now" when? In a week? A month?
You are just jumping to conclusions. Announcing new stuff for february 2011 doesn't mean it's going to be an actual sequel. In fact, I'm ready to bet it will be more likely a second big expansion, like Awakening.
After almost 2 weeks of full immersion game I'm ready to say: buy it. If your computer can handle it, it's simply the best multiplayer fps ever made.
[QUOTE]not liking it at the moment, I love destroying the enviroment, but except for that, its nothing like COD, and never will be. Maybe with more playtime, i will get used to it.[/QUOTE] You're damn right, nothing like CoD. In fact it is far, far better. I'm temted to say which if DICE will fix server issues it will be the best multiplayer FPS I'vep layed in my entire life.
I think you don't match requirements, in this pic.
We are just talking about graphics so I will take my chance to ask... 3d models (scouts, soldiers, sovereigns, etc) are placeholders or they will be mostly the same in the final game? Cause I must admit I don't like them very much.... Well, i don't like them at all actually.