you don't have it? hmmm... I thought it was in everyone's profile... I could be wrong (often am)...
DavidK
It's really a much bigger issue. I have absolutely no problem with protecting one's copyright. I have no problem with prosecuting people that sell illegal copies. I was in the consumer electronics business when the Betamax was released (by Sony ironically) and watched the trials where the Supreme Court decided in favor of the technology because of the potential benefits it promised (about twenty five years ago now). I worked with the guy that invented video rentals. He went through the
I find it insulting that Sony would create a copy protection scheme that prevents you from playing their CD's in certain CD players. I do hope the DMCA gets challenged in court but I have no expectation that today's courts would rule in favor of the consumer. If the federal government can tell the governors of 9 Western states they will block any attempt to "look into" allegations of unfair energy pricing by Enron, the President can tell a world conference that he will not sign a unani
Look in your profile and see what the filter is set for. It's the box that says "Show skins with this rating or higher". Set it for 1 and nothing will be filtered out of the list.
Alex - your new icon is very pretty... and that's quite a amazing heart you made with it... Hi Doreen! I got an icon now too... I hope Java and feline don't get mad at me cause I got one before they did... although, I have a feeling there's about to be an icon explosion here... thanks Alex...
What would your icon look like Peff?
yep, it should. As long as you have the skinnable apps installed a Winstyles .suite will download the skins and apply them. I'm not sure what it does with skins you don't have the apps for. I assume it just ignores those but maybe it offers to go get the software for you? /me realizes he must try out Winstyles...
I like JRiver's Media Player, it does everything. My favorite MP-3 player for sound quality (and skins) is Sonique. but, being lazy, I use Winamp for mp-3's and WMP for video...
Well basically, If you want to use the pixtudio Windowblinds skin, you need to download and install Windowblinds the program. Same for NextSTART, ICQ&ICQ+, Winamp, etc. Each skin in the suite is made for a particular piece of skinning software. They all do something different, but the same, you know? Like all the band members in Cheech's group getting the same outfits but not lame like all matching... the same, but different... I've lost it... now I'm gonna go sit in the corner
https://www.stardock.com/stardock/articles/skinprimer/skinprimer2002.html A bit more in depth...
Actually, Windowblinds already has the capability of changing the wallpaper, fonts and icons when you load a theme (sounds too). I think there was a skin from treetog or adni18 that used all those capabilities. I don't know if many people are using those features or not since I have them all turned off on my machine. My point was that it's rare that an artist that creates a Windowblinds skin will also create icons and a wallpaper to go with it. More likely they would have one or two wa
What kind of skins do you mean? Windowblinds? Some Windowblinds skins (most in fact) where made before Windows XP was around so they don't have the start menu/taskbar enhancements. The other possibility is... are you using WindowsXP? If not, you won't get the Start menu/taskbar enhancements that are specific to XP only. If that is the case, then you can download ObjectBar to add those bits to any version of Windows...
Ezio says: "Windowblinds works well with every theme but, of course, without the wallpaper so again the purpose of changing the appearance completely is defeated. I suggest you do not accept any longer any uploads unless the wallpaper is included (one can change if he does not like it but the entire desktop is changed)." The skins, themes, suites and wallpapers you find on this site are not "themes" in the Microsoft Windows color scheme sense. These are skins created by someone for
First gwall's problem - The Winstyles suites come in different formats. If it has a .suite extension, it doesn't include any of the skin files, it just points to them on a skin site for downloading. That would explain the 1kb filesize as it's only an ini file. Suites that have a .theme extension include the skin files so they are usually up in the 1Mb range of filesize. The use of a .theme extension is limited to themes that are uploaded by the artists that created the skins
hehe - spot on Bill... funny I didn't think of that... logged out, locked up my system, rebooted, tossed cookies, logged in... all is well now... brain snapshot device re-energizing
whoa... some serious misconceptions here... /me goes off to get a cup of coffee to settle down and write a long response to this thread...
suites, themes, etc. does not explain what you're doing or what is changing your wallpaper. Are you applying a wallpaper and having it change after applying a skin? What kind of skin are you applying? Many of the skinning programs change wallpapers like, NextStart, Windowblinds, DesktopX, Litestep, and Winstyles (to name the ones I'm sure of). Some of these programs allow you to choose not to change the wallpaper with a checkbox in the configuration screens.
Is there any documentation on these settings? I can think of several areas they would be helpful in controling. Large Fonts are evil...
so did that one... (enough testing... I have confirmed that it happens everytime for me) The submit button is not in harmony with the greater will of the site.
but that last comment went to the error page...
nope... it worked the normal way creating a thread.
Is this happening to anyone else? Everytime I post a comment, I get a DNS error page (this page cannot be displayed). If I hit the 'back' button my comment is there and all is normal again... It will be interesting to see if it happens when creating a thread... *submit*
one little two little three little indians Dan Quayle syndrome, that's scary... is there a cure?
The real issue is the continuing assault on technology by private interests. The back-room meetings where decisions that restrict the world's access to electronic data are made by a small group of legislators and corporate interests. Not surprisingly such legislation traditionally seems to favor the interests of a small group of private concerns. The entertainment industry would prefer that no technology to create your own recordings or share your work in a quality format with others w
native american... or mr.tomatoe head...