Not to say there are a great number of politicians who do that, but the democrats seem to want to run the country based on polls. cmon now...stop with the stereotypes. look at the GOP primary so far. the big story is the sell out of principles from the social conservatives because they believe that giuliani is the only guy who has a prayer during the general. and speaking of the GOP primary, let's not forget mitt romney, mr "convenient position change."
Sean Conners aka SConn1
of course there's defense. Offense too. Many are defending their titles when they toe the line twising the word and definition doesn't count. there is no active defense in running. interfering with another runner in many running events is considered a foul. it's all about offense...getting across the goal the fastest. sorry, "defending a title" doesn't count. hell, that would make a spelling bee eligible. i think you are confusing not
It doesn't surprise me at all that Hillary works just like her husband and votes however polls tell her to. Neither have the moral compass to pick a position and stay with it, and both rely entirely on the majority of the public to tell them what to think and do. i'm not goin there quite yet, but thanks for the comments.
Does anyone know if you can really resit the exam 6 times? resitance is futile, lol
Then again, the girl could be talking out her ass, too, and have nowhere near that high of a GPA. I've neither seen it verified nor disputed...yet. Give the bloggers a couple of days, I'm sure much light will be shed on the subject. that's a possibility i wouldn't discount. i was under the impression, i guess falsely, that she really had a 3.5
But then I am just surprised that any read it some did, some didn't..and that's a measure on how one does theri job. not the only one, by any means, but one important one.
So what did you do? Blacklist someone else? And for what? Not agreeing with you? what? i wished him a nice day. just because you posess that scarlet letter...lol
Well, why not California as well? lol...i have a sister that might take issue with that, lol.
Also, one could have a high GPA in every other required subject and still not graduate. You have to earn passing grades in EVERY mandatory subject. English is a biggy yeah, but i have a hard time believing that someone, despite any origin, could do that well grade wise and fail a basic skills test. they didn't say she failed english, and a 3.5 would suggest that failing english would be improbable. plus, i didn't see anything about her failing any classe
Wow, I'm a bit surprised that Brad didn't switch your legs for using JUers' names in your title. it seems the "TOU" these days are pretty much disregarded. i guess with the blacklist feature being able to be bypassed via the forums they have decided basically not to enforce anything. i can't remember the last time anyone got a "timeout" for a few days...which usually served to cool things off on here, if nothing else. these days, the only option, accord
Actually, this came out a few years back. sure,,but these books are reminding us of such things. and i think this is a lil more important than the tripe about bill's indescretions and related junk. this is about how she does her job as a Senator.
i'm still wondering how one gets a 3.5 GPA and fails a "basic skills test." something is very wrong there. i don't know where exactly, but it should be looked into.
This summer reading season is seeing a crop of new books about Senator Clinton. Some of them positive, some of them negative. Most of which, even the ones that don't paint the forcmer 1st lady in a positive light, aren't kind about their marriage. Unfortunately, that's not much of a bombshell. Real news might be if we found out they had a great marriage. B
Florida will be underwater i always thought it was california, lol
and my jury is still out with lincoln. i'm reading team of rivals now (have been, off and on for months now,,,it's a slow read). when i finish it, i'm sure i'll have some more definitive opinions and some reshaped ones. it's a really interesting book, just so damn detailed, it's very slow. but "the world is flat" was like that too somewhat, and that was the best thing i read in at least 5 years.
i'm surprised to see more haven't touted john adams. he tends to be the darling of the right, esp the religious right. and since this sight does tend to at the very least, "lean" right....i thought i'd see a few tributes to him. but regardless of whom anyone picks, there will always be the "counter -argument." as for a couple of my own picks...i think FDR would be at the top for me. the new deal brought us out of the depression. he l
i wsa gonna leave this alone...but since you are so kind in continuing the thread...we should note that since the la airport didn't garner much attention, the next day, they trot out 2 year old intel like it's current (again) and make more hyperbolic claims about it.
No all they have to be is REPUBLICAN. or in this case, the enemy of the neocons.
Kieth is a TOOL who is proud that he pushed for Imus' firing. sky...if ya wanna keep posting on my blog. elevate the level of your comments a little, ok. and try to at least come close to sticking to the subject. it seemed the whole world wanted imus fired. but you want to blame keith olbermann, lol... not that that has anything to do with this in the 1st place.
Yep, volunteer force...stop whining. have a nice day:)
happy birthday doc
Not everyone has to be in a suit (though for some positions, that shows you've got your head on), but looking like you couldn't take a few minutes to put a good foot forward doesn't always go well. i disagree. i've always worn a suit. or at least a jacket and tie to every interview i've ever been to. even if the dress is casual. i'll allow the interviewer to advise me on proper dress at work. but especially when i was young, employers were always impre
I could see where F.D.R. could easily be a person that shows up on both the best and the worst lists and would rightfully belong on either. there are several that different sides see much differently. perspective has a lot to do with it. but not always. after more thought, i don't think i'd put harding on that list. like brad said, his presidency was uneventful, but not horrible or anything. but it's all debatable. after all, it's politics.
oh, the flattery...lol
You absolutely must follow up with an email after the interview. yes, that is a must. unless the company is not very email proficient. then a snail mail note will do. but get it out fast, as companies move at a quicker pace a lot of times today. if you wait a few days, the decision might be made by the time your not e is received. but follow-up is necessary. prompt, polite and professional.