Has adultery slipped lower down our moral ladder as skirts get shorter? apparantly someone sees an asterik next to "thou shall not kill" and the stuff about "coveting" other people's stuff. but i do agree with you, the 10 commandments are a pretty good guide to life, not the only one, but one of the more "time tested " ones.
Sean Conners aka SConn1
it appears his attack ads are not working,,,reports say casey is widening his lead over santorum. on another note, santorum was the unfortunate victim of a stalker last week...i felt bad for him having to deal with that nutjob. and like clinton, was perfectly justified in losing his temper.
more form "my own research"... Clarke repeatedly warned the Bush Administration about attacks from al Qaeda, starting in the first days of Bush's term. "But on January 24th, 2001, I wrote a memo to Condoleezza Rice asking for, urgently -- underlined urgently -- a Cabinet-level meeting to deal with the impending al Qaeda attack. And that urgent memo-- wasn't acted on."8 According to another Bush administration security official, Clarke "was the guy pushing hardest, saying again and again
That is total BS. How do you explain that on many more than one occasion the Clinton administration had the oportunity to take Osama out and didn't? i have,,,look at some of my articles from 2004 like "richard clarke is credible, here's why" and troll somewhere else please. when clinton did try, he was accused of wagging the dog by the GOP, including john ashcroft, then a senator from mo. now they wanna rewrite history and s
and btw, i seem to remember clinton "waving his finger" many times, one instance is when he was giving a tribute to the late mrs. king jr. same with the voice tone...common for him....selectively putting it with the lewinski witchhunt...talk about punditry! stop the nonsense.
I wasn't offering it as fact. It's my opinion you most certainly did,,,reread your own post,,,nowhere does it say "this is my opinion." it simply says "it was also planned" in concert with the cocktail party psychology in "waving his finger" or whatever . it was presented as a fact,,,don't back off that now when that is clearly a lie. Well you certainly act like one. Clinton made a fool out of himself, no question about
apparently, going by her own post, emily has evidence to the contrary. still waiting to see it...is this where someone nitpicks something and blows it way out of proportion?
one more point,,,,to all the people saying "it was planned" by clinton....do the same for everyone else as you demand from everyone else...PROVE IT. you can't , can you? it's just your pundit brain overwhelming any source of rational, critical thinking. in my opinion, clinton should have lost his temper a long time ago. he has been gracious thru all of this. sometimes too gracious. BRAVO FOR BILL!!! (and btw, ya'll know, i'm not a democrat, right?)
btw, the last time i posted a link i got attacked for doing that...this time i copy'pasted because i agree with olbermann and clinton here and it was easier to do that than essentially plagarize his work, redo a few words and represent it as my own, as is done over and over again on blog sites. look at my articles drag, i have a clear body of evidence of my own research, writings and facts. despite your article's claim, linking or copying some
ok draginol...i wrote on this subject well over 2 years ago,,,,here's what i said... Richard Clarke Is Credible, Here's Why... Pundits already said (pre 9/11) what he is saying now By Sean Conners, a.k.a. SConn1 Posted Monday, March 29, 2004 on Thoughts, Views, Opinions and Rants Discussion: Politics About a week ago, Richard Clarke testified before the 9/11 commission under oa
The headlines about them are, of course, entirely wrong. It is not essential that a past president, bullied and sandbagged by a monkey posing as a newscaster, finally lashed back. It is not important that the current President’s portable public chorus has described his predecessor’s tone as “crazed.” Our tone should b
i'm not one to copy and paste too often, and i'm hardly a "far leftie" ,,,but again,,Keith said it best....from last night's countdown: The headlines about them are, of course, entirely wrong. It is not essential that a past president, bullied and sandbagged by a monkey posing as a newscaster, finally lashed back. It is not important that the current President’s portable public chorus has described his predecessor’s
the lotteries in american states usually do go to a fund such as helping the elderly. i know the pennsylvania lottery and delaware lotteries earn money for those causes.
thanks,,,see i'm not the "leftie wacko" i get painted as, am i? as far as taxing marijuana sales, i would like to see it done on a state level and perhaps fund education (like a state scholarship fund that all graduating residents could get a piece of) or go towards a fund for health care of all children and/or seniors. i'm not big on taxes either (who is?) but i like to see them as localized as possible and go to a direct cause as much as possible. it seems the more generici
although i personally don't believe the administration did much pre 9/11, like when they ignored the aug 6 PDB, "Bin Laden Determined to Strike Within US" and the other things like their entire foreign policy agendas based around missile defense and putting terrorism on the back burner...there is no way it was missles. like most conspiracy theories, it gives way too much credit and discounts the fact that too many people with no agenda would have to be on the payroll to kill thousands of america
i'm curious to which half we find some common ground on guy take care, sean:)
i think some of the rednecks i grew up with had the theory that speed enabled them to smoothly "fly" over potholes....lol i had a business law prof. once that suggested hanging for speeding, and the public displays over the highways of the hung people would greatly reduce people's "need" to get there so fast. sean:)
This morning, I was thinking "what platform planks would MY political party have?" This is what I came up with in my head this morning. Keep in mind, these are platform planks, not policies or plans. they are not minutely detailed or specific. Tax Policy....taxes should be minimalized and simplified. Not endorsing a totally "flat tax" but the tax cod
thanks texas,,,a lot of gals seem to dig dan the man abrams over @ msnbc.
ok, let's say i'm an american citizen. i am illiterate. i turn 18 and i see a place where i can register to vote. i take in my birth cirtificate, take it to the registration site, where someone fills out the form for me, i sign it as best i can, now i am registered. election day comes, and i have no id except my birth cirtificate. yet i am an american citizen, and had the nec. id required to register. should i be denied my right to vote because i don't have a driver liscense or state is
still standing by this article?
This is a perfect Example of how the Police and the MSM ruin peoples lives with innuendo and speculation. This is what happens when the law does not do their job, they rush to judgement and stop looking for the real killer yes it is,,and you are 100% guilty of that as well...nothin like the pot callin the kettle black. The criminal will be returned from the orient to face trial here in America, He was being
Actually it was a yes or no question, and you did a fine job of dancing around it. Is Torture OK in some instances? Yes or no, pretty simple. Nonsense! dance around it? no i didn't. in fact, looking up, i'm the only one who did answer. your premise is a bad one...in oversimplifying it and asking is it "ok" to torture, you are essentially asking "should it be legal" and my answer is no. my answer required more explanat
thanks for the comment baker...i have to also mention christine robach on MSNBC for an honorable mention, alongside soledad,. another who has bounced back from pregnancy nicely.
I still haven't seen one good reason not to require ID to vote. OK, ONE MORE TIME...our laws guarantee the right to a secret ballot. some see the ID issue as compromising that secrecy. you or i may or may not agree with that, but it is a legit argument within our laws. one could also make the point that requiring ID in effect violates our laws which abolished things like literacy tests. i'm not sure if someone could get an ID i