He has spent his poltical life only appearing with interviewers who agree to keep lobbing softballs. got anything to back that up? or is that just a GOP talking point? Unfamiliar territory for the bit of scum. calling a president of the united states scum,,,how unamerican of ya, not to mention just plain low class...and again, has nothing to do with the issues. despite what you think, there's a whole
or ya could just move me down the list, lol take care man:)
i wrote the article,,,it's up to you to refute what i said,,,not the other way around, nice try! and most of what you pointed out have nothing to do with the points i contended. coming in and throwing a bunch of junk up and challenging me doesn't wash, it's a red herring and i ain't playin. this is my article...if you wish to make additional, nongermaine points or discuss another subject, write your own article. of
try again draginol,,,,no evidence supporting your claims and trying to divert and expand the subject won't wash. the problem is condelezza lied, again...and none of the right wants to call her on it,,,again. she is a disgrace that gets coddled by the right because they think she makes em look racially diverse. i have presented plenty of evidence concerning the points i am discussing, and could go on and on with more, but you or no on
Nobody was sufficiently clued in to the terrorist threat before 9/11, not Bush, not Clinton not true. the fact of the matter is there is a clear pattern of evidence that the bush team not only understood the problem less than the clinton team, they actually lowered the priority which is shown by the demotion of clarke, the refusal to hold the principal meeting concerning terrorism and much more. anyone who remembers the bitter
no, here is what clinton claimed...1) he tried, but failed. bush loyalists claim that clinton didn't try. 2) he gave the next administration a plan to deal with the situation. bush loyalists say he didn't here's what the white house said..1) clinton's people never gave them a plan. i contend they did 2) they were at
this article has been at the top of the joeuser homepage all afternoon,,,it's now 5:10pm, and no one has yet to refute anything said. just a little nonsense and rhetoric.
follow-up...it appears from reports that the only person claiming it was a suicide attempt is a police officer whom we don't know if they had an agenda. Other reports suggest he was in pain after practice and over did it. this is one of those stories i suggest we wait and see till the dust settles before drawing conclusions. it may have been an attempt, it may not have been,,,who knows at this point? i surely wouldn't put my name above any conclusions here.
ordinarily, i might feel bad for anyone who did this,,,but considering i have terry glenn on my fantasy roster,,,,lol j/k
Over the weekend, news junkies were treated to a series of "back and forths" concerning former President Bill Clinton's interview with Fox news anchor Chris Wallace. Wallace, claiming e-mails had forced him to ask the questions, pressured Bill Clinton over what he did to stop terrorism and Al Quaeda during his tenure. Clinton resonded with emotion, pointing out where
keep chasing me like a car, puppy:)
you talk a great deal about lying and have accused the left of 'lazy intellectualism' and yet so far you - and others - have failed to give any substantial weight to those claims in regard to the the core argument that has been put forward here. exactly which part of clinton's defense is a lie draginol? well, ya see the nonsense i had to deal with from puppy when i tried to get some actual evidence. they just claim "clinton is lying" and move back to personal attack mode.
They both knew how to play an audience. they did, but the point i was making was more about their ability to work with both sides and get the things done that can get done,,,then use those things as possible springboards or opportunities to try to get things done that are not nec. agreed to in advance. even if everything doesn't get done, i believe both sides can benefit from understanding the other side better and that's when the "enemy" mentalities start to subside. u
Typical. Cut and run. BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! consider a career in comedy puppy-dog. this is my blog,,,don't think i'm goin anywhere . next...
No, pathetic is col jihad and avoiding the questions like you have been doing. yeah, ok....somewhere a village is missing their idiot...better run along home puppy. again, if you really read my stuff, you should know that the only encounter i have had with this col that you seem to have a hard-on for (is that too offensive for ya? tough) is when he made unfounded accusations and i called him on it. that happened in the last week i believe on here. if you wan
oh, island dog,,,give this up,,,,read your history (like the 9/11 commission report, which i own and refer to regularly) and the grasping at straws with the "profanity" charge (is ass really profanity?) is an act of desperation. i'm tired of repeating myself,,,if you have anything new to add,,,let me know. until then,,,, have a nice day:)
What facts have you provided? It seems to me you are the one paranoid here. Whining and crying about being attacked when nobody has done that to you. Quick, go post some more about Keith, prove to us again you aren't a left wing hack give up island dog....you are getting pathetic. and by the way, you did exactly as i said you would...thanks:) LMFAOROFL!!!!
I have been accused of worse. lol,,,haven't we all, lol. once again, i very much enjoyed your feedback yesterday guy. when we (in a general human sense, not me and you in particular nec.) can find common ground, i believe it helps us understand one another. that might sound like some "wacko-hippie" idea, but from my experience, it's true. that was something i thought both clinton and reagan were good at, not only as president, but in life. one example...i rememb
You didn't answer the question. What was his respone to the first WTC attack? Why didn't he fight back? How many times did he visit the blast site? yes i did,,,both points.get your head out of your ass and maybe ya might see that
Nobody is attacking you. If you can't take the heat of a political forum without whining about it, then get out. oh pUHLEEEEAaaase!!!!!!!!! get over yourself, i've been doing this a long time and pointing out your juvenile and parroted attack lines and methods is hardly whining. it's simply stating facts. facts that you keep dodging in each response as you begin your next lil bombing. you are just another bully behind a
but ya know what is really funny? when ABC and Disney were selling out to the administration and putting out their fake, made-up pack of lies presented falsely as a "docudrama" all the right wing bush loyalists claimed "everyone knows it's fiction and it's their right to use "artistic license" in telling their story." now, after the documentary, hacks like chris wallace are using the documentary and faux emails as an excuse to smuggly attack the former
Dr. Guy agrees with a few of your positions, so what? I don't think all of the things you listed are not valid. thank you for pointing out the difference between you and I...while I try to find common ground, you just keep spinning, attacking and hacking. everyone has biases, there are times i lean left, times i lean right...and yes, i have disagreed with most of this administration's policies, but that hardly makes me "pro-de
Sean seems to dismiss anyone who disagrees with him as a "cocktail party psychologist" - funny, that only when the shoe fits
What was clintons response after the first WTC attack on U.S. ground? Maybe you can tell me how many times he visited the blast site also? You remind me a lot of col jihad. You keep claiming not be a democrat, but you sure do defend them a lot. his response was to bring the bombers to justice ..he tried other things, but was accused of "wag the dog" tactics when he did try to kill bin laden. the 9/11 commission backs that up. and as far as my defense,,,in the l
Well I'm here to inform you I have read your "stuff" and you seem to be nothing short of a far left liberal. ok...here's what i wrote yesterday...btw, dr guy and i found lots of common ground...does that make him a far left liberal? If I Started My Own Political Party My "Traditional Progressive" Party By Sean Conners, a.k.a. SConn1 Posted Monday, September 25, 2006 on Thoughts, Views, Opinions
JoeUser Forums