thought some others might want to have some fun with this,,,guess i was wrong....oh well
Sean Conners aka SConn1
is this tom cruise's blog? j/k for the record, i'd lean towards "B"
and COL., i don't know you, but it seems to me you want to do the same,,,start a fight...and terp is right, there are no "federal elections" as it pertains here, our elections are 50 independent state elections which nominates the electoral college. but you are right that there are certain laws that are federal, such as the voting rights act, which is a federal statute. as far as what kind of ballots and other methods of voting go, those things are still left up to the states, even mor
I would hold that more often than not it's the left that uses the scare mongering headlines, sound bites and video clips to the detriment of all around them far more than does the right. i would respectfully disagree with this. but we can agree to disagree here, i don't see any minds being changed. all i wanted to do was show the other side of the story. you challenged in your orig. post that no one could do that. i clearly did. that should have been the end of it. <br
Note to Sean Conners - the hyperbolic headline is there to do just what it apparently did for you, incite a reaction. The Democrats and liberals in the media use that tactic constantly so you'll have to forgive me while I borrow some pages from their big book of tricks and apply them for the good guys for a change. i know why ya did it, i wasn't asking...but again, to imply only 1 side does that is intellectually dishonest. all headlines are desined to "incite a reaction" that's why they a
i'm not sure the orig. poster actually believes as they preach...for example... Morality is the same in all times and all places. It does not vary.There is one true moral code, and all others are wrong. I seek this code, and try to live by it to the best of my understanding. I try to learn more about this code and understand it better. but in 2005, the poster saw putting up with greed and ignorance in Iraq as OK. E
So that means yes, its OK in some instances? i'm not sure where you are going with this. i'll try to rephrase for clarity sake, my view....that if someone breaks the rules, they are to be held accountable. that ensures that if someone needs to break the rules, the same standards of accountability apply. we are a nation of laws, not men. But that is not what the GC says. So should we go by them or not? When do you consider someone a
I would not normally post on these subjects as I reserve my own ideas on this. But I have to ask a few questions of both parties onthis conversation. 1. What is torture? Not the book definition but yours. one reason so many are against a specific "list" of acts here is because that is pretty much irrelevant. torture and inhumain treatment are defined by the person receiving it, not by the people doing it. yes, there are some things th
one more note,,,there is an old philosophy most americans embrace when it comes to our legal system. in our criminal system, we require the burden of proof to be beyond a reasonable doubt. the old saying goes "better to let 10 guily people go free than to convict 1 innocent man." sometimes that gets a little messy, but on the whole, that is what our constitution dictates. the same applies in voting some would argue..."better to let 10 unregistered voters vote than to deny 1 person thei
i understand your side of this terp, and it does make some sense and hold some water. i don't appreciate the hyperbolic headline, but that's your perogative. voting is a right, not a priveledge however. why does the NRA resist every attempt for the powers that be to regulate guns more? because, as they see it, owning a gun is a right. they need not show id to buy it, register it with the govt. etc, etc... no one need show id to exercize their right of free speech, or religion,
thanks bee,,,have a great day:)
This is a brand new public domain 9/11 Truth documentary about the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center complex. 1st off, it's not new...2ndly,,,it's as much bullshit as anything else. get over the conspiracy theories folks,,,it gives people WAY too much credit usually. these nutjobs spewing this crap out only does a dis-service to everyone who seriously cares about this nation and it's future. on
Accuse your own Gov't, ignore the rest that's just bullshit. and as far as my education goes,,,you can rest assured, it's a good one. and as far as taking me serious goes,,,,you feel free to draw your own conclusions in your own head. i'm not here to impress ya chuck, sorry. but the attention you give my blurbs is far more evidence that you "take me seriously" than anything you can claim here. 1st they ignore you, then
Sconn can't really comment on this, without raising the question of why he doesn't comment on any of the instances of his own faction playing the exact same political-spin game. who is my faction? if you are implying i'm a democrat, you'd be wrong. lying isn't justified from anyone. and i do see santorum as 1) desperate, 2) lying and 3) definitely trying to save his job. there's another 32 senators doing what they can to keep their j
excellent perspective. i grew up in the burbs of pittsburgh, here in the states. but i could relate to some of what ya said. i was discussing with my wife the other day that people under 21 look at things with a different perspective than we do...for example... * the internet has pretty much always been there. when they were toddlers, it was primative, but i doubt most em think like that. * cell phones have always existed to them
thanks for the comments folks:)
santorum, who has voted with the administration 98% of the time, is hardly the "rino" he is trying to paint himself as by selecting the 2% of the time he went against for his ads. if rick santorum is a RINO, i'm George Bush. people in my family and cirlce of friends, which include insiders, staffers, politicians from the GOP and so forth, have talked about Santorum as the one they are "grooming for the presidency" since before he was a senator. if the
Just a break from the serious debates and all...This morning I was thinkin bout how many good lookin women are on the news. Without getting into a debate about sexism, plastic surgery or anything else serious...who would you rank in your top 5 news babes (best lookin)...and do you have a "worst babes" list as well? feel free to share, here's mine... hottest:<
this is a fun little game,,,give it a try! Link
i didn't want to plagarize, just sharing...your point? why don't you go attack dr miler or some of the administration loyalists for doing the same thing on a regular basis since 2004? there is plenty of my own commentaries on my own site, and there will be more, i'm sure,,,but for now, i was just sharing an article. sue me.
Factcheck.org covers how blatantly dishonest Rick Santorum's new campaign ad is. Santorum should be ashamed, but he's probably not. This is true desperation. Check out the article here... Link
If your trying to post a link to something that supports what you're talking....it's best not to use your own "blog"! i'm sorry, was i breaching your "blog ettiquette?" sorry lil boy, i'll do things the way i see fit, and there, i didn't feel like repeating an entiire article i just wrote. much easier to do that, and doesn't flood someone else's replies with a whole new, multi page article. i've done it before, and i'll do it again. and
Fully 2/3rds of the house and 3/4's of the senate voted for "not" against so what? my point was not EVERYONE bought into this bs,,,we were right then, we're right today. in what other part of life do you gibve full faith and credit to people who are wrong about almost everything over a 5 year period? if your broker missed on stocks for 5 years straight,,,doubt he'd have a job. thank you for reinforcing my point. And
Islamic leaders/terrorists have stated they will accept no less than world domination by islam. that was 1 statement made by some previously unknown group after the pope's diatribe against islam. osama's goals, as he has stated is to rid his holy lands of us imperialist zionists and capatalist pigs and all that mumbo jumbo he spews. no, he hasn't been exacly consistant all these years, but the world domination thing didn't come from al quaeda