Bakerstreet, Scheer's dismissal did a good job at highlighting paper mergers. After running his column for more than 12 years, the Los Angeles Times fired Scheer in November 2005 as part of a revamp of their opinion-editorial page that also saw the firing of their conservative editorial cartoonist, Michael
Slanderer
I was hoping to play a little game of fill in the blank. Wouldn't you like to play? I was hoping my obvious faux pas would start into a much needed debate which was in keeping with the history of one word soundbytes of Ms. Coulter. Specifically, I was referring to FahrenHYPE 9/11, a direct to video[heehaw] documentary or should I say docu-comedy which can only be described as as an afterthought.
No, this isn't a Queen retro tour, but another nail in the coffin of media punit Ann Coulter. With Rush-link verbosity she sticks her mouth where others fear to go! I thought this post would be of interest and a personal up-yours to all the trolls of JU. Link<
I saw this coming years ago. With an ever deteriorating budget, bad spending practices and a few wars, liquidation was inevitable. I say go for it.
I would agree with you except right now the internet is a buzz with activity speculating when an attack will occur. This is one of those instances where people can neither prove nor disprove a statement. Best bet is to sit and watch things unfold as usual.
I don't know where this rush-ski gets his info from, but he really makes bold prediction on when the Iran war will begin. Link I hope he is wrong, that this all one big misunderstanding but something in the back of my mind tells me otherwise. I distinctly remember Mr
Well as everyone has found out Link our persian friends have gotten themselves into a bit of a pickle. What I found odd is that within hours of seeing this statement Mr. Rumsfeld fires off his own piece of rhetoric <a href="http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/CHA445184.htm
I was able to read an article this weekend that brought up the idea of martial law. It made some fairly solid points of bringing in the military for domestic use and then using it as an umbrella for disaster relief. Take a gander. Link <B
I was leafin' through the news one fine day when one of the more austute writers on the 'Hill brought this to my attention. Link "There is hereby created and established a permanent police force, to be known as the United States Secret Service Uniformed Division." This new federal po
To the authour, I'll give you points for asking questions but you've lumped alot of stuff together. You've noticed a contradiction and have wondered why certain situations use violence to achieve peace. To answer your question there are places where it is desireble to have peace. There are also places where peace is not desired. Simply the pretension is enough. A good indicator of where the attention is by following the National
Even though I am not a fan of Harper I think the change is healthy. It provides closure over the gomery inquiry, it forces a reconstruction of the liberal base (which is not a bad thing), and does make some efforts at addressing west vs east concerns. Whether Harper sticks to his promises is another discussion! I agree with Ubob, if Harper crosses a certain line the minority rule he has is toast.
At least they are honest about it. I wonder if there will be any takers. You know I could think up of some very mean pranks on someone else' computer. I think I will start my search with "how to make a nuclear bomb 101". I wonder what the response time is from search to some guys knocking on your door?
All you did was dismiss with the likes of your "absolute crap" comment and condescend. I am willing to communicate, you are unable. That is why I feel it isn't worth my time. It
I just knew you would say that. I'll refer to good ol' dictionary.com to help out. Nationalized: To convert from private to governmental ownership and control: nationalize the steel industry. 1. To make national in character, scope, or notoriety: “His high profile on such issues as abortion... has already begun to nationalize his image” (Kenneth L. Woodward). 2. To render distinctively national: charact
Yes maam. I'll refrain from linking articles, providing traceable google searches and historical quotes immediately. My unwillingness to play ball the cantankerous opt-ed way must be getting the better of me. So sorry.
What's the matter? No "witty" come-back? To bad, so sad No I am just taken aback why you wouldn't check out such an easily veriable fact. Here take your pick: Well either this authour is out to lunch - Link Or Forbes Magazine is
Oh no you don't because I am through with you Slanderer. A failure or unwillness to communicate is the cornerstone on building a conflict. And by the way, if you take th
You are obviously too myopic to grasp what I have been saying. I said that I agree with the right to free speech when he is exercising it here in his own country. Why the need to go somewhere else if he is so brave and righteous? It makes little difference where his location is. <TABLE cel
It bothers me because the guy is an idiot who lends encouragement to those who wish to do harm the the US and our way of life. I guess if he is allowed to come back to the US and lives, he will have been proven wrong about his statement. Obviously the biggest tyrant and terrorist in the world wouldn't put up with that. <
Could you be a little more articulate as to why you this bothers you so? He is speaking his opinion and whether you or I agree with it, it is one that does not support the current leaders.
Well done Kingbee, I had completely forgotten Kirstol was the head of the conservative. Stephen's name rang a bell but I couldn't identify what article he had written. Today I remembered. Stephen was the man behind Case Closed http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/378fmxyz.asp Who reported on Feith's memo http://www.antiwar.com/ips/lobe080703.html And issued a retraction http://www.de
Oh come on Moddie, what you really wanted to say is that you lusted after her from the moment your eyes met. This whole American thing was just your way of navigating around the lust issue. C'mon fess up!
:: Ducks in quick ::: Is it a bad time to admit that I have always thought Franken was pretty funny!! (at least when he wants to be) ::: Ducks back out before the crap flies ::: ;~D Were that laughing with him or at him?
:: Ducks in quick ::: Is it a bad time to admit that I have always thought Franken was pretty funny!! (at least when he wants to be) ::: Ducks back out before the crap flies ::: ;~D Were that laughing with him or at him?
:: Ducks in quick ::: Is it a bad time to admit that I have always thought Franken was pretty funny!! (at least when he wants to be) ::: Ducks back out before the crap flies ::: ;~D Were they laughing with him or at him?