You need to go into the personality section and set it so the skin knows you're using the 6-state titlebuttons. Right now it's set to 3, so that's why it's showing the inactive buttons too.
The first 3 (or 6 if you have the inactive window buttons enabled too) frames are as they normally are. (Normal, pressed, mouse) The animation ones come straight after them.
Check your BIOS as well. On the board I have, you can change the setting for that button from in there. Also, if you can't get it button working, you don't need to pull it off. You 'could' just not use it.
I watched it. Best PPV in the last 10 years, easily. Finally, Eddie and Benoit get a chance to shine. It was long overdue.
Randy, you need to add an extra visibility setting to that button and set it to 'adds to border'. It'll be missing that now, so that's why it's not working.
I think it's related to tiling margins on the sides. If a margin is set bigger than than the height of the rolled up window, you'll see chunks missing.
I'd say develop for your own. Whatever type you're using. Obviously, if you're doing client work, there's probably some standardised colour calibration, but for general skinning, your own monitor is what you see your work on most.
Before the GP, I was excited about the traction control and auto-boxes being banned. After falling asleep literally 3 times during the race, I'm wondering if it really was such a good idea.......
I hope you exiled and moderated McLaren while you were there Paul. They were utterly pathetic.
To be honest Babyruffy, the best way to decide is try each out seperately and see which is best. You'll always get different opinions depending on where you ask. We're predominately WB-biased here, so most people will reccomend that. But, I say see which you like best.
Should be fully restored now.
I'll have a look and see if I can find it for you.
"Take a look at the work "Zippo" and please, don't tell me it's not over-saturing and lacking contrast. This is my point. The reason these people are getting hired by companies for graphic design work is because of the lack of originality to choose from." In a word, no. Your point contradicts itself by implying Zippo falls into the 'unoriginal' bracket, then you say Pixtudio (And others similar) only get hired to create original things. Skins offered here are for personal use on
Where d = that word that's not working here just now (You know the one...)
I've exiled the socks and d the offending hole.
Wat ees thees gooey limpicks yo all speek off??
People don't skin as a service to others. You paid for Object Desktop, you didn't pay for the skins. Considering you're getting them for free, I'd be a bit more restrained with the demands. Put it this way, with the skins, you're getting what you pay for.
I think this is ObjectDock he/she may be reffering to.
If you're subtle, you can use them to add a bit of realism to a pic: https://www.wincustomize.com/skins.asp?library=8&SkinID=15301 Problem with most people who use them are that they hit the button that says 'in your face', when adding one.
It's to do with the margins set for tiling the sides. Sometimes they conflict with the rollup state if the bottom margin is quite large. It can be fixed by placing a titlebutton over it with no function, and set only to show on rollup and having the missing part of the frame as it's graphic.
D'oh, exact same time as you were on it.
Removed comments, and mailed the person with a warning.
WinCustomize Forums
Ahh, I thought you meant the button for setting full windows to transparent, David. Sorry.
WinCustomize Forums
It's still functional, David. It's a built in WB feature that can be assigned to the click attribute like any normal function.
It wasn't DesktopX. Stardock have no need of any third party ad scams and tracker files, etc. The spyware you had was undoubtedly from the company you say were convinetly selling the product to remove it. Stardock sell no such programs. [Message Edited]