Question to Lula: If Jesus is our sin sacrifice. Weren't all sin sacrifices 'burnt' and 'inside' the temple by Torah mandate? If this question is true how can Jesus be our sin sacrifice if he was neither burnt (which would have made him a human sacrifice which again is a violation of Torah) nor was he killed 'inside' the Temple.
Funny how this works.
[quote]The proper term for people like you that do this is call Trolling and you my good man (or woman) are therefore a Troll[/quote] Can we call'em driftwood? They come and clogg up the free flowing idea echange in different threads. They are about as useful as driftwood since they rarely contribute to any kind of discussion. They eventually get bored (or cross the admins) and are unjammed to float down the river to another blog site. &nb
[quote]but i think one person does not like what i am saying so they are saying i am spamming when i do not ever spam anyone[/quote] Dude, you contribute nothing to the thread. Your only motive is to promote your youtube videos. Therefore you are a spammer. If you don't even know what the definition of a spammer is how can you be running for POTUS?
[quote]Welcome, myst_man. You'll find lively debate here, and unless you engage in personal attacks, spamming threads (like jdcriveaux just spammed yours) or otherwise violate the terms of service you may express your opinions freely. Enjoy your stay. [/quote] Ditto.
[quote]why when i speak the truth and must repeat myself there must be a reason for look who was elected last election how many times did he repeat himself saying the same thing over and over again[/quote] So far all you have spoken is, "I'm smart come see how smart I am, you stupid fool." *sigh* it's times like this I wish LW was here. These forums are for discussion and exchange of ideas not to run around promoting yourself. Cal
[quote](The above said dripping with so much sarcasm there is now a swiming pool of sarcasm under me...)[/quote] Hmm, my waders aren't high enough.
[quote]Ironically the more you spam in every thread for me to do that, the less likely I (and everyone else) are to actually bother 'checking out jdcrivea'. Especially when in most of your posts you're simply copying and pasting the exact same thing.[/quote] Despising spammers knows no politcal lines. [e digicons]:digichet:[/e]
[quote]i do not spam i chose each article seperate and did each one only one at a time it is that you do not get it like so many of you out there[/quote] If you are not spamming then why are you coping and pasting the same thing on different articles? You have contributed NOTHING to any of the threads but feel compelled to promote yourself? [quote]you can not search for the answer and worst you can not see it when it hits you in the face so like the
[quote]let's see there is already term limits for congress it is or called DO NOT VOTE THE GUY OR GAL BACK INTO OFFICE oh i forgot you all can not figure that out and let me tell you congress believes that also so you keep voting them in and voting them in and voting them in MY GOSH HOW DUMB CAN YOU ALL BE and you say i am amusing well if you do not like what congress is doing and you still vote them in NOW THAT IS COMICIAL well now if you ar
[quote]But it's not a betrayal if they're raped, because people don't choose to get raped - it's forced on them by someone else.[/quote] That's up to the judge to decide. If the court decision was rape then the guy is stoned else it's both. [quote]Maybe they're gagged, or drugged, or forcibly silenced in some other way? Maybe the rapist threatens them (and/or others they care about) with death? Maybe instead it's the pure shock of the ordeal? Maybe they've got a cold/oth
[quote]hello what you all are saying are very true but there is an answer to all this and you will never find it in washington d.c. or overthrowing our government then where should you all look well trying going to youtube.com and checking out channel jdcriveasu listen to those videos and hear what jd is saying and besides who do you think can fix our problems the ones that created these problems or some one else so all i ask is that you go to youtube.com checkout jdcriveau then you decide [
[quote]He said, " I now find my political philosophy more in line with Democrats than Republicans", so it must be a Democrat value.[/quote] This shows his mental capacity. His political philosophy has always been more in line with the Democrats than Republicans. Took him this long to figure it out???? It's a wonder the Republicans didn't kick him out earlier.
[quote]Then maybe you're confusing the two parts of my post - one is relating to rape victims being stoned to death, the other is husbands being able to try and get their wives killed by falsely accusing them of not being virgins (prior to being married). I never said the latter was rape.[/quote] Nor did I. [quote]for that I apologise.[/quote] Apology accepted. I can't really give my opinion on the subject matter because I don't fully understand the context
[quote]Are you really telling me you see nothing wrong with requiring someones parents to provide proof of virginity, and if it can't be done then the woman should be stoned to death?![/quote] Hmm, you seem to be reading more into what I said than what is written? I only provided to you information that might help you understand the culture of the time. I didn't offer my opinion but rather my understanding of the scripture set and it's cultural reference. [quote]Al
[quote]In other words, husband falsely accuses wife of not being a virgin prior to marrying him, knowing that unless her parents can prove otherwise she'll be stoned to death. He's given a fine, while the woman he tried to have killed is forced to stay married to him.[/quote] In the verse 13-21, there is no instance of rape. The groom/husband gave a bride price to his father in law for the bride. There were essentially two prices; one for virgins and one for non-vi
Ah so very true.
Aeortar, you are gonna have to tell me where you are reading that a Rape Victim is supposed to be stoned to death. I do not see such a thing mentioned in Deut. 22. Verses 25-27, I believe are the verses you are refering to for the case of rape. In verse 26 it says, “But you shall do nothing to the girl; there is no sin in the girl worthy of death,".
[quote]I was going to say reset button...I was close. ~Zoo[/quote] I am in agreement with ya.
Can anyone tell me how many senators/representatives that have been in more than 10 years stayed consistently conservative or became conservative?
[quote]Like I said, go look for the studies. They are there. I wouldn't be saying this if there wasn't.[/quote] I didn't say there weren't studies. What I did say is that they are inconclusive. Which you are in agreement? [quote]Go do the research, studies are showing that there is anywhere from a likely hood, to a high likely hood. [/quote] likely hood is a mere correlation and is still not conclusive.
[quote]Not always actually, that's a bit of a misunderstand/"myth". There are cases where is no male/female, just male/male, or female/female. Also, dominance doesn't always play a role.[/quote] This isn't about dominance either this is about the masculine and feminine roles in the relationship. In my marriage there are times I'm the dominant one and at other's it's my wife. It really depends on the subject for us, for one to become 'dominant' on. Yes I understand there
Did Bahu abandon this thread too?
[quote]Their physical look perhaps, and in some cases their biological being as well; however, just because you're physically male or female, doesn't mean that you are - to a point. Let me explain it by saying that humans as a whole are one whole being, but comprised of different parts. They are: Biological/Physical, Mental/Psychological, etc. Each aspect may be one way, but the dominant one will prevail. Ex: My friend David. He is, by all senes, female. However, he th
gah, double post. Hmmm, must be two for one day on JU for me as this has happend on a couple threads now.
JoeUser Forums