Phoon

Phoon

Joined Last seen Member # 132445
11 Posts 495 Replies 30,708 Reputation

this is indeed just another remote desktop/terminalserver/citrix/vnc/x/radmin/ thing I'm going to say this again.. . YOU NEED 2 FULL PC'S WITH MONITORS ON EACH. It is NOT a remote desktop/terminal server/citrix/vnc/x/radmin thing. It is not de

68 Replies 109,123 Views

Before you start the "more secure" and "less holes" thing... you should read this. https://www.wincustomize.com/Forums.aspx?ForumID=24&AID=66855#520731

30 Replies 49,761 Views

To quote another section of the full article.. The Mozilla Foundation has fixed hundreds if not thousands of security vulnerabilities over the last few years without notifying the world and without providing security patches, instead they have simply just told their users to upgrade," he says. "We have to remember that all software has security vulnerabilities, the only difference is in how we anticipate them and inform the world about their e

9 Replies 13,609 Views

No, you need a separate monitor for each system. All that is shared is the Keyboard and Mouse. It isn't a KVM, it is a KM. I have my laptop sitting beside my PC though and I controll it with my PC keyboard and mouse. When I'm not using it away from my desk.

68 Replies 109,123 Views

Ya know, I like firefox and all but I still prefer IE. As it has gained in popularity, it HAS become more of a target and the vulnerabilities are showing. But then again, I quote from another thread... That's one of those excuses that gets repeated so often people begin uncritically swallowing it till it becomes "common knowledge

9 Replies 13,609 Views

Several security vulnerabilities in Firefox and the Mozilla Suite of Internet software put users of the open-source products at risk of hacker attacks, the Mozilla Foundation is warning. The organization released Firefox 1.0.1, which fixes 17 security flaws in the popular Web browser. The most serious flaws could allow an attacker to gain full control over a victim's PC, the Mozilla Foundation says in a statement. Firefox 1.0 was released in November a

9 Replies 13,609 Views

Mike C, Here's how it works, as simply as I can put it. You have a PC, with one (or 2 or more) monitors physicaly connected to it, along with a keyboard and mouse. Lets call this your primary PC. You have (with standard multiplicity) another PC AND Monitor, AND Keyboard and Mouse sitting right beside your other one. They are two separate entities that are on the same network. Lets say (for simplicity sake) that you have WinXP on your primary sy

68 Replies 109,123 Views

polished version of Win2Vnc Polished is the key word here. Multiplicity does it without the need for yet another pgm installed (vnc server), Multiplicity will allow you to send Alt-Tab, Ctrl-Alt-Del and other syskey events. The $69 version of Multiplicity also allows you to control up to 6 devices and

68 Replies 109,123 Views

How bout this.. Right Click on the start button and explore all users. Open a second window and start dragging and dropping shortcuts to your hearts content. You can organize it quite easily in this fashion.

3 Replies 9,567 Views

I agree with Lantec here. They are starting out with a real photo. On the ball glove, look closely at the registered trademark symbol at the lower right of the word secca in both images. There is a slight difference. Also, the dog.. no way is that not a photo.

41 Replies 17,228 Views

Brad, What about a comprimise... Show the ratings, without the names. That could only help police the issue better as the admins cannot spot all occurences. Example: Skiname Rating 1: 2 Rating 2: 3 Rating 3: 1 Total Ratings: 3 Now, I realize this does not take into account the different weighting factors involved but it would help the user gain a better understandi

39 Replies 38,439 Views

Question: How does one rate something as a 3/10 on a 5 star scale? Do admins have the ability to rate on the 1/10 scale then? 3 stars = 6 on the 1/10 scale, yet NT said that it had a 3 on the 1/10 scale.

39 Replies 38,439 Views

I saw that an admin had given your N8T skin a very low rating a couple days ago. It was way out of line with the other ratings it had received, so I deleted that one. Next I looked at Batman. It was indeed approved with a 3, but not by the same admin. (rating of 3/10, not 3 stars) So... we h

39 Replies 38,439 Views

Its not the rating sytem that is the problem, its the raters. Ya know.. now THAT is a painfully obvious angle that was so plain that I didn't even think to look at it that way. THANK YOU Night Train.. That single little sentence made more sense to me than any of the long drawn out psychobabble t

103 Replies 27,845 Views

I understand the frequency of threads like this, and I didn't mean to poke a stick in the hornets nest again either. Perhaps the frequency indicates that people are a tad disturbed by the system and it deserves to be thought out again by the powers that be. I see quite a few skins with great comments and low ratings. That indicates a problem. period. On the other side of the coin, the admins to a

103 Replies 27,845 Views

Boss.. I used Boxxi's skin just as an example as it is extremely uncommon to see on one of his works. You left comments and rated according to your comments. That is a valid proceedure IMHO. What I can't stand are the anonymous 1's and 2's that do it just to be mean and try to glorify their own works, or just because they don't like your name, your screenshot, or you in general. I think the anonymity involved is very very counter productive in this env

103 Replies 27,845 Views

I can't help but notice that as of late, there has been some serious rating slamming happening particularly in the Windowblinds section. There have been some fine themes that are getting hammered with 1 and 2 stars and some mediocre themes getting 3 and 4. When Boxxi puts out a new one like Gold Carbon and its getting rated at 2 stars, I think that is proof enough. It seems we have hashed and rehashed this issue, yet nothing ever gets done

103 Replies 27,845 Views