[quote]And proud of it![/quote] Hey Doc, your PPE badge is not obscuring enough of the wall [e digicons]:grin:[/e] [e digicons]:grin:[/e] [e digicons];)[/e] [e digicons];)[/e] [e digicons]:-"[/e] [e digicons]:-"[/e]
[quote]the man is entitled to his erroneous view.[/quote] But none of your views can be erroneous? [quote]No it is not my problem if you have problems with what I believe it your problem.[/quote] No it is not my problem that you believe that on a site with 4.15 million members that the mods have been biased concerning your walls.
[quote]I was taught to say it like it is, if some do not like that that is their problem not mine.[/quote] It is your problem when you are not listening to what has been repeatedly explained about moderation and how it works, it makes what you are saying complete tripe and BS. This nonsense from you is something I would expect of a new first day member, not from a 8 and 1/2 year WC member as you are.
[quote]GIVE A BULLY A BADGE..WHAT DO YOU HAVE?[/quote] Your first day here and 1) no need for CAPS, 2) making a statement concerning a situation you probably don't know all about.
[quote]Why is an active mod allowed to call people retarded? Especially retired military personnel? CLEARLY A PROBLEM....CAN'T YOU SEE IT?[/quote] I see no problem at all due to the tripe and BS coming out of that member the Question was directed at.
If you are doing this in IP config this may be the issue, has always seemed to be hit and miss for most. To create or edit a IP pack Package Builder is the best way.
[quote]please note the top 4 wall paper skinners are above 4000[/quote] That is download count for the last 30 days not number of walls posted.
[quote]this person has posted at least 4000 walls [/quote] [quote]No that person has 5000 skins posted [/quote] Where are you getting these numbers or have you added an extra zero for effect. There is only one person in the top 20 for walls that has submitted over 1000 walls. [quote]I do not want anyone going to my site and seeing my terrible work as it is not deemed to be good enough[/quote] Everyone how has submitted walls here has most likely had some sent t
[quote]as the person who told me my work is as good as any posted is one of your top 10 Skinners of walls.[/quote] [quote]in fact another wall maker told me the walls were excellent and this person has posted at least 4000 walls[/quote] The top skinners lists are by downloads only, nothing to do with quality, someone with thousands of walls in that list would have a low average download per wall. As for the 4000, I think that you are overstating but remember Quality wi
Less has fewer letters than fewer so yes, fewer is more than less. Does that compute [e digicons]:grin:[/e] [e digicons]:grin:[/e] [e digicons];)[/e] [e digicons];)[/e] [e digicons];P[/e] [e digicons];P[/e] [e digicons]:-"[/e] [e digicons]:-"[/e]
[quote]Fewer steps.[/quote] Less is less typing than fewer [e digicons];)[/e] [e digicons];)[/e] [e digicons]:-"[/e] [e digicons]:-"[/e] [e digicons]:-"[/e] [e digicons]:-"[/e] [e digicons]:-"[/e] [e digicons]:-"[/e]
[quote]The only reason there are similar uploads on my site I kept trying to get them to show up[/quote] No need to keep uploading, due to your access/user level the walls must go thru moderation which as above can take 5 days.
Taking another look, Maltese Cross is there twice( same wall ), one that is a zip file with 2 1920x1200 and 2 2560x1600 in it, the other you have uploaded the 1920x1200 jpg for download. Sun Burst and 3D Sun Burst are also the same, one 1200x800jpg and one 1920x1200 jpg, these should be zipped together. Maybe PM Jafo and get him to help you clean this up.
[quote]I really cannot figure out why I cannot see them in the explore/wallpaper area[/quote] They have not been moderated yet, moderation can take up to 5 days. From taking a look at the walls on your site, from Upload Guidelines (specific for walls) "Wallpapers of the same design with slight variations must be bundled into a .zip file."
[quote]won't physically allow it now...the dropdown box only allows .bootskin ..no other choice..[/quote] Just test on IE8 and FF, yep no more zip choice; makes me wonder how the bootskin by inthebloodofeden that was added to the gallery yesterday is a zip file. I had based my previous reply on seeing this. [quote]Create your bootskin [saved as whatever.bootskin]. Rename to whatever.zip - add permission.txt to zip archive - rename whatever.zip to whatever.boots
[quote]the new site will now only accept a file with .bootskin....no .zip[/quote] Hey sydney, I know it states this on upload page but you can disregard it, you can upload as a zip. I believe even if zip file is not stated it can be uploaded for any skin type and be accepted.
From Objectdock EULA YOU MAY: 1. Install and use one copy of the SOFTWARE on a single computer. 2. Install a second copy of the SOFTWARE on a second computer only if you are the main user of this computer (home computer or laptop for example). 3. Install the SOFTWARE on another computer only if you change your main workstation. In such a case you must uninstall the software
Do you use the same email here at WC that you used for the purchase? If paypal I think it may sometimes take a little longer for things to update.
Yep; Elemental forums, recent posts page there is funky button movement with IE8, no issue with FF3.6.3.
[quote]Seems to me it could be easily fixed by removing the 'animation', I don't see what use it has anyway..[/quote] What forums are you seeing this in, WC forums here, what browser, no button movement using FF3.6.3 or IE8.
[quote]I am purchasing a new PC[/quote] If PC as in desktop, neither cpu, the M means mobile, for laptops.
Bootskins for XP are made at and apply at 640x480, at bootup your video drivers are not loaded so will not be controlling the res.
[quote]What a CON. The freebie version of Fences does not need or install this rubbush, so why when you pay for a full verison do they sneek this in?[/quote] It is not a con, free/trial version are as is at whatever version, only updated at download sites when at release versions, as in not betas. Also most Stardock free/trial versions are not upgradeable so should/must be uninstalled before installing full/Pro versions.
Hey Jafo, Neil: in my almost 6 years here I don't remember, but maybe one of you day oners may; was there ever this much uproar/tripe about Stardock Central. ( for those who are new, Stardock Central was the download/install/update manager that Impulse replaced.)
[quote]If it cannot be removed and is needed for Fences, well, then it is part of fences?[/quote] [quote]Whether it 'watches for updates' or otherwise is besides the point.[/quote] If you wish you can uninstall Impulse, it is not required for Fences to run, just to install. As for updates, Impulse is the only way to find and install, since you have paid for FencesPro and this includes updates ( for stand alone normally until the next major version ) how is having Impulse to fi
WinCustomize Forums