What I find astonishing is that it's always the Right wingers going on about dropping literacy standards, yet on JU, it's the right wingers who can't spell. Sorry, I try not to resort to picking on this, but I really do like good spelling. Well, I tend to lack in the spelling department on JU, and the r
Why? To line someones pocket IE: greed. Actually no, but unless you want to get into a discussion on the railroads....I'd be happy to explain why it was not to line someones pocket.
Just for once I have to agree. As well as kill millions upon millions of innocent people. And what does your god tell you about that? I don't believe there is a commandment like "Thou shalt not kill, unless its those damn Iraqi's". And Sir Peter, once again the Iraqi's frankly don't give a dam
I think quite frankly the noise raised over the american lives lost in Iraq is a little bit much. I mean come on, more people die each month due to fast food related problems than will during the entire "war", and I use that term loosley considering it is supposed to be over, and to think that 100 times or more INNOCENT Iraqi lives have been lost. Now, I don't want to see anyone die, but people (especially th
(ill be happy to provide the quotes)-- You mean like Bush spouting off "Regime change" every 10 seconds... good clips from watching the daily show.
What makes you think we're not already fighting Iran (Syria, and other terrorist sponsoring nations also)? There is a lot at stake for terrorist nations (especially the Jihadist types) in Iraq. To think that they are merely sitting around rooting for "their" side would be grossly naive. Not true. Iran a
Ok... well the New York Post article is an editorial abstract (summary) of the article written by the Stephen Hayes guy the original Weekly Standard article was by, and the second one refers to the Stephen Hayes article when it says where it is getting its information from, so I see no actual confirmation of this, just refrences to the same shady weekly standard source. By the way, I don't think the New York Post is the most credible source... seeing h
OK, frankly I'll admit I didn't read most of the 2nd article, but from what I saw, give me a more reputable source or a confirmation from another source that such a memo was recieved. I have never heard of the "Weekly Standard" and therefore won't accept it as anything more than opinion. In regards to the first article, it didn't in anyway show how Bush's plan is working. Sorry, you failed in trying to prove a point by using weak supports and shady sou
I would just like to point out that there are (albeit not very good ones) reasons muslims hate Israel.
It is crying, whining, just make friends with them and they'll leave us alone people that let Adolph Hitler run throughout Europe, let Saddam Hussein and his regime rape, pillage and torture, and have let terrorists like (may he burn in Hell) Yassir Arafat ruin the chances for peace in the middle-east.
I would like to point out that the reason we went into Iraq is not available to us. The president of this once great, and hopefully to become great again in four more years, country, has been moving some "goalposts" of his own. These would be the "reason" for invading Iraq. He has told us it's democracy, he has told us WMD's, he has told us saddam is a "threat" he has shouted Bullshit all over the place, but the fact remains that no where, NO WHERE in
How can you make someone inelligible for something that they are helping to pay for? Very easily. Think about it, it happens all the time. I am not elligible for Welfare. As a Business owner, I pay into unemployment yet I am not elligible for that either. I
Actually, a trillion dollars is a million million. A thousand million is a billion. Think about it. 100 Million, times 10 = 1 billion, and thats 1000 million.
One of the things that needs to be done to social security, and I know this is not right, but it is going to be a major crisis if we can not control it, is to essentially make rich people inelligible for social security. One way to do this would be something like, 50% of all (non social security) income up to $100,000 will be taxed if you choose to accept social security, and 75% of (non social security) income over %100,000 would be taxed if you choos
Personally, I'm disappointed we aren't applying more torture tactics in the on-going fight against terrorists. Frankly, I don't get pissed off very easily, [Censored, because I know this post would be immed. deleat
Personally, I'm disappointed we aren't applying more torture tactics in the on-going fight against terrorists. Frankly, I don't get pissed off very easily, but you will burn in hell for this horrific belief. You are the downfall of America. I am embaressed and disapointed to have people like you in my c
No, it's the stated belief of Powell. Not of the U.S. government. Individuals that actually put thought into this realize quickly that Powell is being overly optimistic about this issue, and it's likely to have any real impact. The United States is not bribing anyone, we are merley showing that w
How much is that per individual?!?! If I did the math right, $10,000 per person?!? For someone whose life savings up to that point had been (assuming here) something in the neighborhood of $100 - $1000?!? Well, if you were basing your "math" on the number of people who perished, then it was actually ina
Sorry.. that was not in response to your comment.. that was to show that even though the scandal is Anan's son, this does not reflect on on Anan because Bush's family was involved in scandals yet this does not seem to give reason for him to step down.
http://www.rationalrevolution.net/bush_family_and_the_s.htm
The problem here is that the USA is making the UN out to be worse than it. The worst scandal here is the scandal of the United States fabricating evidence to go to war with Iraq. It doesn't matter if it was Bush, but then by the reasoning here he should be held responsible and should step down. And the UN seems right now to be better.. because I didn't see them invading Iraq. Whoman- The federal government of the United States does not co
I would also like to point out the fact that if Donald does not have to resign as Sec. Defense even though he messed up BIG TIME, then why should an elected leader resign? I would also like to point out to whoman69 that we do not provide the secuirty, we did not provide the land and we did not build their headquarters. The land was donated by the Rockefeller family. The security is proivded by United Nations Security Forces, it is international territ
New Page 1 <!--webbot bot="HTMLMarkup" startspan -
Whoman69.. I think you can ask anyone here I am as antibush as they come. I am just saying... he has an unprecidented oppertunity..so let us pray he doesn't mess it up.
I'm tired of hearing how arrogant we are, when we happily help those other nations and peoples that come to us in need. If the world would stop coming to us and asking us to solve their problems for them, maybe we wouldn't be so arrogant. You sir are the reason why people thing we are arrogant. I am no
JoeUser Forums