Well-stated, P_F. I believe your summation is quite accurate. The fact that Kerry can be eloquently vapid does nothing to persuade me that I should reconsider my preference for President. President Bush is solid and resolute, if inarticulate - unlike Kerry, he has core principals and beliefs to be inarticulate about, his actions and clearly sincere Love of Country speaking much louder than his words. In the all-time "political chamel
Daiwa
COL Gene - There is no eveidence that Bush "failed to obey orders" - that is a bit of wishful fiction that some won't allow to die. The reason he did not fly after April '72 is that he was not qualified in (trained to fly) the aircraft used by the Alabama unit, which is the reason he didn't complete his flight physical - he knew he would have no opportunity to fly again before he left the Guard. He was not AWOL. But enough already. What di
I think TheFazz is onto it. I'm pro-choice, for stem-cell research, believe the war on drugs is the real wrong war, and have no problem with gay marriage, either, all of which happens to be totally consistent with being a Goldwater Republican, which is the closest thing to an appropriate "label" I can think of for me. So us righties are more like you lefties than you think (at least some of us; actually a lot of us, I suspect). I also happen
Don't you find it interesting that someone with the handle "liveletlive" is such a sanctimonious jerk? I would have expected someone soothing, reasonable and tolerant of others' views. Just shows you what a distorted image some of us have of ourselves. Cheers, Daiwa
No, I suspect the debate will survive a wee "joke". Joke was on me. Cheers, Daiwa
stevendedalus - Here's the problem, at least as I see it: There is no perfect method of knowing the specifics of when, where and how terrorists will strike us or of knowing who's harboring &/or supporting them. Note I said perfect. The terrorists will make sure that is as difficult as possible, with all their strength and cunning. 9/11 happened. I don't want to see 9/11 The Sequel. You are simply wrong to
drmiler - That was intended as a small joke, obviously not a very good one. I meant to convey that since Furry Canary had nothing to say about the topic, he changed the subject to your formatting. I think little_whip's vote for Bush is safe. Cheers, Daiwa
I'm casting my vote for whoever imposes a tax on inappropriate and excessive use of quotation marks. Thanks to Drmiler, we could ALL live in luxury! I guess the debate here is over. Cheers, Daiwa
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Commentary/blog_9_13_04_0730.html http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-09-12-cbs-media_x.htm Sorry, my browser wouldn't let me capture these as links. Copy/paste as you wish. Cheers, Daiwa
MusiKitty, you haven't missed a thing. Don't let this tweak your interest in watching CBS ( C omplete B ull S hit), either. Follow the link in the article & you'll get a pretty good idea. Cheers, Daiwa
people that see themselves as Republicans, feel compelled to support their Rep. nominee, regardless of whether or not they truly like him. This is a false & facetious statement, not to mention insulting. There are any number of issues on which Mr. Bush and I hold differing views. Some of my vie
First, let me apologize for going overboard there just a tad. Not very PC. True, but not very PC. I'll try to do better, use asterisks or something. Bullshit! I know somebody who was discharged (honorably) from the U.S. Military because they had a skin disorder that could not be treated, and which shaving only caused
I try avoid bigots when I can. I'd steer clear of mirrors, then, you sanctimonious sack o' shit. And I love it when an Anonymous User says something "for the record." Cheers, Daiwa
former generals still have weight right? Kingbee - I just caught on to what you were getting at (missed it in the blizzard). However, you are wrong. I can tell you from my personal experience in the Navy from 1978 through late 1980 that retirees are treated with respect and accorded e
And now we learn that CBS never had the original documents in their possession. There are no original documents for them to submit to independent examination. Dan Rather is an even bigger idiot than we thought for running with a story he could not even come close to confirming. Cheers, Daiwa
Personally, I am convinced that these are forgeries, and I am convinced that they were planted by Republicans, or with the cooperation of the Republicans. (If they are reasonably smart, it will turn out to be the latter.) On the basis of what evidence , exactly? First the documents are claimed to
And we have Rather's confession, anyway. He's already said that the questions he has raised are far more important than the basis for asking them . Cheers, Daiwa
That's hysterical, Messy!! Great link!. Here's their line of reasoning: IF it is possible that some 1973-73 vintage typewriter somewhere could type a proper superscript, and IF it is possible that some such typewriter could have used a font similar (or identical to) Times New Roman, and IF it is possible that some such typewriter could have accidentally gotten the hea
"And you can only be impeached for acts committed while in office, so you're gonna have to try claiming the Iraq war was an impeachable offense, or something else - I have complete faith you can come up with something." I'll retract that part - you're claiming he lied while in office. OK, not good enough (& not proven), but OK. Cheers, Daiwa
if the whitehouse believes cbs owes bush a retraction, i doubt theyll be shy about demanding one. until they do, this is all so much noise that's ultimately distracting attention from much more serious questions, not the least of which is bush's honesty. if its an impeachable offense for a sitting (or possibly standing ) preside
CrispE, you're really reachin'. 1) The evidence is inconclusive. It is not conclusive that YOU can duplicate the document with Microsoft Word. This only says the technology to forge is available, but is not a smoking gun. The "technology to forge" would be a typewriter in use in 1972 & 1973<
The celluloid-wisdom link has been taken down or is broken, FWIW, Brad. Cheers, Daiwa
If he loses the election, at least he can find work on Easter Island HAH! Nearly snotted all over my keyboard! Thanks TW & Bungy. Made my day. Cheers, Daiwa
When all else fails, and in this case everything fails, they'll blame it on... who else, Karl Rove. You watch. Cheers, Daiwa
Well done, did you ever notice how some of the better written blogs actually seem to receive less feedback and tend to sink like a rock in the JU forums? "Better written" is in the eye of the beholder, def. 'Course, it depends on which eye. <img src="../images/smiles/joke.gif" border=0 ALIGN="absmiddl