Okay Brad, You're fired If I were you, I'd quit worrying about spending less time at work. I did the same in the past, and as much as I got into it at the time, I discovered that I didn't get out of it what I put in. Spend your time with your family, work will do just fine.
Aleatoric
I thought I didn't see the option either, but if you look just to the right of the hue bar (left side), there's a little icon with three colored squares. If you click on that, you'll see the advanced color options. (at least that worked for me (also with the latest build)).
Worked right off the bat for me, moved the skins and all Seems like it's working quite nicely. My only question is are we going to get our command prompt skinning back soon? It's something I use quite frequently, and it's pretty ugly right now (if nothing else, let it stay Aero when excluded, right now, even excluded, it still uses the old classic style window frame).
If an employer wants to place specific (or general) restrictions on what an employee does during work hours, I'm not particularly concerned about that, that would go with the job. My issue is with the rectum sourced 'loss' numbers that these kind of studies always come up with. Just like all of the other studies that claim to estimate loss from one cause or the other (piracy, slacking, browsing, facebook, etc.), the researchers are more interested in what they 'want' the issue
The main problem I have with these kind of 'studies' is the presumption that the time used is actually taking away from something. If your job involves sitting at a computer (this being the kind of job that would allow for frequent diversions of the likes of facebook), then for the most part, your job is probably task oriented, which means that you should be measured by the tasks you complete, and not so much by how much time it takes you (or how much time you might use browsing, or get
Yeah that would bas [sic] as cool as say oh some one unlocking the object desktop subscription so it can be installed on any computer... Hypocrites... That's an invalid comparison. First off, you can't magically copy off an iPhone and give it away for free (at least not yet ). Second, once you buy it, it's yours, and it is explicitly legal for you to unlock it t
From what I've heard (read) even Apple had to accept locking to get some of the features it wanted (visual voicemail for one). Which is part of the problem. There's no *good* reason for locking phones to a particular provider. There's the argument for subsidized phones, but the contract can handle that part, whether the phone is locked or not. Locking is nothing more than an anti-competitive measure. Given the various unlocking methods for the iPhone, it's not illegal to unlock
The issue of whether WGA is bad or not (it is) is an ancillary issue. If Microsoft were truly serious about their stated purpose for WGA, they would not allow it to be (or be controlled by) a single point of failure. Reliable, high availability systems are a commodity these days, and there's no legitimate excuse for this kind of failure (certainly not for a company with the resources of Microsoft). It is incompetence, pure and simple. It's either incompetence in the server room, or it's
I think the current TweakVista appearance is rather nice. It's a pretty clean skin, and looks well thought out. But it does look different from the rest of my desktop, so it takes away from the overall effect that WB is intended to create. It would be nice to have an option (like a checkbox or similar) to choose the default skin or to conform to the current WB theme. It just strikes me as kind of odd that a company that makes applications to change the look and feel of
One question: I like the program, lots of good tweaks and options, but why does it have to have it's own specific appearance? Why can't it conform to the current WB skin? This is pretty odd behaviour from a company that advocates skinning the interface.
It frightened my cats. They'll never forgive me now
All this technology, and you don't have buckets? Best of luck to all affected, even a new and possibly awesome piece of software can wait for you getting on with living without a lake in your house
Unless it's unlocked, it's not an option Besides, it's a first gen product, never buy a first gen product
This stuff all sounds quite cool Not sure how much attention you're planning on giving to the small players, but as someone who gets a lot of use out of Stardock virtual desktops, I wouldn't mind seeing a version that looks good on a transparent taskbar (picks up the transparency and any blur/special effect) <
Beautiful! Fantastic work, as always! Definitely a must have addition to a skin library
Giving it a shot right now. Works pretty well, even the transparent taskbar is 'live' So far the only issues I've found are that changing the skin caused explorer to die (got the vista 'something bad happened to explorer' dialog ), and Office 2007, while it skins well, t
It's nice to know that OB2 is getting enough testing to make sure that everything will work correctly. Hopefully, this trend will continue with other Stardock products (for example, it would have been nice if Stardock Virtual Desktops had been tested as thoroughly and the wallpaper switching issue with IconX had been resolved, prior to the 2.0 release). I'm really looking forward to OB2, it's an application I want to use as I can see it as a
(lumberg) Uhh yeah, boss0190, I'm just going to have to sort of disagree with you there (/lumberg). Hope you have a nice cave If you think I'm arguing that this is some kind of apocolyptic occurance, you're a bit off base. For all I know, the startup sound might even be pleasant enough that it doesn't piss me off every time I hear it. <
Oh, I fully expect that a hack will be available about a microsecond after release. Given that, I don't really think this is a permanent state of affairs, but it does go a long way toward indicating what Microsoft *really* thinks about their customers. They think they're going to present some 'spiritual' experience that the customers will eat up like pudding. That's just stupid. I don't have it in for Microsoft, and I don't hate Windows, but
From the looks of things, Microsoft seems to be so smitten by their marketing that they believe that you'll always want to hear the default Vista startup sound, no matter what. Here's a portion of a quote (from the Scobleizer link) from Steve Ball, the program manager for audio video experience (oops, I mean excellence) team at Microsoft, "The bottom line is that the rumors, stories, speculation about the new Windows Vista sound are true," Ball said, "but with a number
Looking forward to it!
Ms skybright, While it was not my intention to target your position in particular (I simply quoted it as a specific example of an opposing viewpoint), it's still pretty obvious that you harbor some sort of resentment about what others get to do at their jobs. Otherwise, why would you even bother to develop a negative opinion about it? And while it's true that everyone has a right to their opinion, said opinion doesn't really count for much u
I have two very good reasons for the total lock down position. I will make this short and sweet. I have two sisters In two completely different jobs in completely different States thousands of miles away from each other who on purpose do not have internet service at home because they have total access at work and email accounts
I think a lot of it has to do with the reasons for allowing/denying internet access. I can't say I have a lot of sympathy for someone who will freak out and turn down what might be an otherwise good job just because they can't browse the web. But on the other hand, there are quite a few job duties that are benefitted by (if not require) general internet access. One can make the argument that a company intranet should have all information nee
Glad to hear you've got some OD updates in the works. I'm always happy to hear about OD getting plenty of attention. On the 'what would I like to see' portion of our program, I'd like to see some of the interoperability issues between various OD programs get resolved. I shouldn't have to give up a feature in one OD program just because I'm running anothe