Have to agree with Fuzzy, that horrible language is getting old really fast.... but the pictures are cute.
aufisch
Great news indeed! Thanks for the work. Damn! Can't lord my 32 bit OD+ over those 64 bit bastards anymore Poor Lantec, would it make you feel better if I told you that you still can rub us Right-Click and IconPackager into our faces?
Hi NT, yep, I am all settled in now Point taken. I think the tutorial should state clearly that logons modified in such a way are not to be redistributed under any circumstances. Someone who really wants to distribute anything illegal in such a way will probably either enter a fake name or insert a name of a known skinner anyway. I am not a cyber-cop, but I think the first person who would be
I strongly disagree. Leaving the original Authors name and only changing the background is wrong. wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong! No it isn't as long as it is not redistributed. I've done that myself countless times, and I also change WB-skins as I seem fit to, but only for personal use. Creating a tutorial that shows the newbies how they can adapt skins to their own gusto is certainly not wrong at all. There are tutorials here on WC that s
Another suggestion; why not make it that skins with 1 star or less won't be included in the download stats? Alternatively: Skins with 1 star or less will be automatically moved to the personal gallery after (three?) days. That way "newbies" get a chance to get their skins out there and receive comments by their peers. If their first skin is crap it will disappear quickly and not get many downloads, but they will be able to either improve the same skin or take the comments into
I was afraid of that.... I think its all Lantec's fault, he mentioned Babya in the "Windows Blinds is f*****- SYSTEM FILES PROBLEMS"-thread... ...he jinxed it!!!!!
see the problem now is that you deal with MEN Hate to break it to you, but no matter what you tell me; you just sound like a twelve year old spoiled and badly behaved teenage-kid. If you really were a programmer (and a man), you would have: 1. Never used a cracked version in the first hand. Quick info: cracks often work by messing with system-files, hence your problems with uninstalling. 2. Contacted Stardock support with your prob
Yep, here in Switzerland, when we say WC, we sure as hell don't mean Wincustomize....
I know that it won't solve the cause of your problems, but until it is fixed: Have you thought of using a proggie like "unlocker" (it's freeware)? I have been running this on my XP-machine successfully for a while now. It even tells you exactly which program holds on to an "undeletable" file.
Quick-Time and WindowBlinds seem to work well together on Vista 64-Bit. No problem here with those two running together.
nope. somehow my reply to another post concerning WB setting color schemes and overriding them ended up here No more tabbed browsing for Bichur...
No go for 64-bit
Thanks for the info I'might try the trial first, not sure whether it will work on 64bit. Fingers crossed...
Is it any better than Diskeeper? I found Diskeeper to be a ressource hog and got annoyed with it accessing my HD's constantly/non-stop. Would be glad to have an alternative though..
Still no 64-bit support for the free version
'Hardware Interrupts' 43%. I once had the exact same problem on my XP-Laptop. In my case the culprit was a PCMCIA Wireless-Network card by Siemens. I tried to uninstall and reinstall that thing again and again, but to no avail. When I contacted Siemens about it, I only got the "there have been no problems reported with this card.."-answer. I am still not sure whether it was just one of those strange hardware-clashes or whether the card itself
I almost feel sorry for the guy who gets himself a nice, friendly Taipan for a pet.....
Doesn't x64 mean any 64-bit system? I always thought that in this case this refers to XP64 and not Vista64. The IP-Homepage still says Vista 32bit only? In any case, I noticed that the History-file on SDC isn't up to date. It still shows the changes in 3.19g RC instead of 3.20.128.....
I'm having some pretty strange problems with Iconpackager and Windowblinds on Vista x64. According to the History-file, IconPackager is not yet cleared for Vista64 (not even in Beta, unless I missed something...) ....I guess we have to be a bit more patient, sigh.....
It initially worked on Vista64, but the last upgrade must have broken something. At least it doesn't work on my Vista64 anymore. I don't know whether this problem has been solve or not.
I have to admit, I thought I didn't miss WindowBlinds. Really, after switching to Vista64 earlier this year I thought that Aero looked cool and that I didn't really feel the need to customize my desktop anymore. And I didn't! The longer it took for WB to get Vista64 ready, the less I missed it. When yesterday I noticed that the newest update to WB included V64 compatibility, I thought hard whether I really wanted to install it or not. Did I really need it? Would it mess with my system?
I would love to see if widgets would have the ability to use the current WindowBlind skin. I am not sure how hard it would be to implement, but it would make changing the overall-look of your desktop much easier. In addition to that, having lots of skins for different Widgets would then be the ideal combination and would certainly give the people the freedom to customize their desktop individually. It would most likely require that Stardock creates the most common basic Widgets as some
Congrats Fairyy~ A well deserved promotion indeed.
Jeff has always been extremely helpful in solving problems. I am really sad to hear that he is not well. I wish you all the best Jeff, and hope you get well soon.
Save configuration... png-support... plus Vista 64bit compatibility (preferably not half a year later than the 32bit version)