That's ok Migellito, I respect your opinion About being getting heard, that's much more easy if you are part of the people that run a site, rather than just someone who bypasses and starts wondering about things. </A
Thanks elvee and WOM, I am getting there, lots of work to do still..so far so good...cheers everyone, keep up all good things
Mark, I agree with you the name of the site is a little bit unfortunate It's better to replace "art" by "collections" or something. But having said that I am sure people will start calling me names My experience is, that if you have criticism on any site, you will not be heard, or mostly not, you will get accuse
but you can pull a long nose when everybody has to work wom I am fine folks...almost ready for bed, renewed the work in progress pic on the profile, for any of you who like to follow the making of this digital painting. <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/sb.gif" border=0 ALIGN="absmiddle" ALT="Powered by SkinBro
GM <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/sb.g
But a chit chat kind of game won't help. That only enforces anger. Take the subject in the middle and try to look at it from different sides. Then you might come closer to a common view. Any conversation like this won't help I am afraid. And in conversations to what is art, one is totally lost. I have some thoughts about it, and another person may have the opposite meaning. I did learn that again on this site <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/joke.gif" border=0 ALIGN="absm
in times of sauerkraut and curly kale where weatherspirits turn skies pale WOM faithfully brings all their mail and surprisingly faster than any snail WOM also brings stories of personal hail tehe GM you got me in the mood <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/sb.gif" border=0 ALIGN="absmiddle"
Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeek. Cant we stop this? Different point of view, different sites. Copyright is there to protect the maker from unauthorized distribution. Why? Because of potential loss of income. That's the basic thought. Thats why the law was made in the first place.
yeah the trees in bryce are fun but you know, like colour is a tool to trick the eye, graphics programs are a trick. Someday we will see artists that arent taught the teachings of colour, like the boy that said chicken eggs come from the supermarket. I don't mind. Different world, different values. Some works are quite good, but it will never get the personal radiation as one works with real material an
thanks Jafo for your time
doorbell while clock strikes 4:30
proof as in prove..
yes, thats what I was talking about. I always thought you had to proof it's your work. Whether you register it or otherwise. Never thought it was by default. Gosh...Thanks crae, the eyes and mind got boggled after chapter 3 <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/sb.gif" border=0 ALIGN="absmiddle" ALT="Powered by SkinBro
Much appreciated, thanks Paxx Comparing this with our law from 1912 which is renewed in 2000 and still find old dutch writing <img src="http://images.sta
reading the dutch law 2000 now
Now, that is strange...can you show me where that is legally said? Default copyright? Is it Us law, or international law?
seems to me a Jafo question..Jafo? can you help?
Hey I am trying to understand this. You must have a license as far as I know to show your work is copyrighted. It has to be declared and put in writing, eg writers sell sometimes their copyright for a book and get royalties in return. Everything is neatly done in writing and signing. I wonder if you put a "C" under your work, your work is legally "C". Can someone make this clear if it isn't so. <img src="http://images.s
Is that so? So if I put a "C" underneath my work it is copyrighted?
I thought that copyright was only given if the maker has presented it as an item for copyright? So whatever you will put underneath, C or no C, if you can't present the the copyright granted paper you have no copyright. Or is that wrong?
listening to the debate of the common reflections of our new government. sort of state of the union where opposition is free to interrupt...apart from that greenpeace guy yesterday that wanted to call upon a minister for environmental issues <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/sb.gif" border=0 ALIGN="absmiddle" ALT="
afternoon WOM. enjoy the day, beware of lightnings...no umbrella's
aaaaaaaah it's about copyright again....are these international rules or US copywrite rules? It's a pity it all comes down to this issue. About money...We should enjoy all that is made, whether it is a home, car, airplane, painting, skin, humans....
but what if you implement a small keyboard in one foot and a mouse in the other WOM? eer I was wanting to say ping-pong...I have much more fun using the mouse as an oldfashioned brush than applying all kinds of effects and filters...bryce makes interesting instant landscapes but then the painting starts...no knowledge of painting...bad endproduct..also the abstracts done with filters and 3D programs seem so much less of emotion than abstracts on canvas...A computer has no heart and can only
seems you had a romantic night there elvee...somewhere up a mountain and citylights in the distance....
WinCustomize Forums