GreenReaper

GreenReaper

Joined Last seen Member # 2172
1 Posts 57 Replies 28,092 Reputation

It is true that buying direct from us will be most directly beneficial to our bottom line. We want to make sure that it makes it in stores, but I think that given the current situation we are not anywhere near as concerned about this as we were last week.

8 Replies 8,405 Views

Well, it's not called "breaking news" for nothing . . . As HEEGZ says, check drivers (both video and sound), and make sure you're patched. That tends to solve most issues. If not, let us (or support) know more.

3 Replies 5,584 Views

I think it would be cool to have something . . . let's call it an "Eden Device" . . . that could be used to convert class 0's to something good - but it should cost .

44 Replies 28,579 Views

I'm not quite sure what the problem is. You have to put the serial into Stardock Central once. That should be it. If you've bought online you might not even have to do that, as it'll probably associate itself with your Stardock.net account. The dual serial numbers were a mixup at Paradox's end, and by the time they realised there was a problem it was too late for them to change the boxes, so we just had to deal with the situation.

10 Replies 6,530 Views

I never deal with tributists. If they want the money, they can come and take it! Besides, they'll probably just send a few wussy ships and I'll crush them and they'll sue for peace, like all the res . . . yes, what is it? Commander, we have a Torian Battlestar on the starboard bow! What?! They were in Alpha Ceti VI last week! Quick, man the . . . ohhh, sh-*BZZZsst*

17 Replies 10,056 Views

Some AIs are probably better than others at this, but it could also be that AIs grabbing all the good planets early on smacks of cheating, even if they do it legally, and "isn't as fun" as a slower expansion rate. I know this was something that was discussed previously on the GalCiv forums. If this is the case, it might be possible to put more of a "killer instinct" for planets in on the higher levels.

22 Replies 18,496 Views

Progress on the wiki has been pretty hectic - there's now over 160 pages, and yesterday we had 4,000 visitors drop by. Not bad for a week-old site! Many thanks to (in no particular order) Steelviper, Manny, Raijen, MxM, WanderingPhysicist, DarthKryo, ConsumedCrustacean and Siel for their recent contributions, as well as anyone else who's dropped by to edit a page or few. It'd be nice to see more strategic discussion on there, though,

28 Replies 26,049 Views

tetleytea: I'd have to disagree with your statement that it's a "mainstream commercial product". It's a game. Games tend to have the same "version 1.0" issues as every other new product release, plus they are often far more complicated than most applications. You're right, though - we should get more QA, but it's not as easy to find reliable staff as you might think. Most high school students do not make good bug testers. And, unfortunately,

22 Replies 30,731 Views

You should be able to archive the game on one PC using Stardock Central and restore it on another if you need to get a copy to a machine without internet access. Wireless cards are pretty cheap nowadays, though.

11 Replies 13,507 Views

OK, guys, chill. Let me give a little more background. SDMCP is not spyware. It sends nothing back to us, for a start, and isn't involved in collecting any personal information. At the worst, you could call it bloat, though even that's pushing it. Its purpose is to help some of our Stardock applications work by providing a central resource for things lik

45 Replies 24,860 Views