If you're a skinner, you can find out more about the updated DXPlayer or suggest new features here .
GreenReaper
Hmm. Well, I know iTunes can have artwork associated with a track, as can WMP (although it's a bit more tricky to get it out with that). I'll have a look at the plugin and see what it does, and see if it's possible to add something like it (looks like it checks directories and the internet too - the "search the internet" thing might not be so possible for legal concerns, but files on your disk are fair game). The end result if implemented woul
Fortunately Brad doesn't wear suits all that often so it's easy to clean off.
More specifically, it shouldn't actually have come as a zip file, but probably a .dxtheme - try renaming it to that (you may have to turn off Explorer's extension-hiding function in Explorer/Tools/Folder options.../View tab) and then double-clicking, having already installed DesktopX.
That is because the site does not correctly handle the situation where the user has white text set. For some, using the iefix.reg file included inside the Program Files\Stardock\Object Desktop\WindowBlinds\Blackcomb directory (double-click it) will help, but if it does not, your main method of recourse would be to complain to the site admins, because they should not be relying on the text colour being a certain colour. Usually it is a simple enough fix
I would go for having the wall as a separate download and having a suite combining both (maybe other things as well if you could do them). Link everything together on the descriptions so people know where to get the stuff.
My point was more related to skins that have the original buttons in nonstandard positions, like on the top left rather than the top right.
Well, it may be, but then the skin author needs to make it easy for the user to customize. People wouldn't be so annoyed at all the skins with buttons in odd places if there was an option to have them in the "right" place (for Windows).
I'm just plain amused that they would say that of mormegil, knowing his history as a Disney computer artist.
It was indeed worth your time. I get the feeling that the community there is pretty responsive and eager to get new users and please existing ones if possible - I guess we'll have to see how it turns out. For now, the foo_winamp_spam plugin seems to work well enough for most things.
Thanks for the feedback, BlueDev! I had downloaded Foobar2000 with this idea, but got diverted. I have had a little investigation, and it seems that there is no real interface to support such remote control/information gathering. This means that someone will have to write one. I think it would have to be someone in the Foobar2000 community as I do not know the API, and really am not all that interested in wri
Eh, it's not that hard to poke at original scripts, and with that you can learn how to write your own eventually. Seriously, I reckon a good scripter could teach scriping to just about anyone and in a week they'd be doing their own stuff - maybe they wouldn't know all the commands, but they could know how to do loops and use variables properly and the like. Of course most people don't have a week to spend teaching you scripting! You can learn it on you
Note: This article refers to changes introduced in the DXPlayer plugin distributed with DesktopX 2.4. If you don't have that version, upgrade now! (trial version here - registered users can use the support emailer to get a link, or download via Stardock Central like ODNT subscriber
Brad, from what I can see you've defined success (as you say, your view of success) as being something that is more easily gained by people who have conservative values - those who put themselves and their close families first ahead of "everyone". I hardly think it's a surprise that the objectives of someone with conservative ideals are more easily met by people with those ideals, because that is what you're aiming for in the first place! As you
Which file in particular? The wallpaper works here, as does the download. The actual object can be found only by searching for it in the galleries (try "snowflake") - WC messed up when posting it, as it has been doing for all JourneyMen. Edit: Ahh, things are changing. The object may now be visible but the download may or may not work - try <a href="http://www.z
Are you able to get it from http://fs5.deviantart.com/i/2004/327/2/6/Winter_christmas_edition_by_bizarreSK.png ?
It's not so much the largeness as much as the moving 100 of them 25 times a second-ness that causes the CPU problems. As for deleting from storage, you could probably go into Program Files\Stardock\Object Desktop\DesktopX\Objects and delete them from there.
Ah. The download should be a .dxpack file. If you find it downloads as a zip because of IE's security "fixes", right-click the download link and save it as a .dxpack file, then double-click it, or alternatively start DesktopX (which you need to use it - http://www.desktopx.net/ ), right-click the tray icon that appears, select Import/Browse..., and browse to the sav
timmy: Well, if you have DesktopX you can use it just by clicking the Download link at the bottom of the article. Make sure you are hiding desktop icons in DesktopX, or using IconX mode if you have that installed (you will get fewer flakes, though). Click the snowman for options.
Firedogs: I'll be chatting to the DX developers about that, then. There is a specific problem with the way DesktopX processes events that causes the user interface to freeze up, and I'm hoping there's a way it can be changed so that it doesn't.
paxx: Well, that may be all your computer can do - what's the specs? Mine only does 150 at once when hiding icons (110 in IconX mode!), unless I let them settle, as settled flakes take up far less CPU time (don't have to move). It's an Athlon XP 1700+. However, it shouldn't get in your way, the flake count should cut back if you actually have to use any of that CPU in other programs. If it is not then somethi
I don't know if that is the case for all societies. Some cultures view success in different ways. Western (and, yes, particularly American) culture is very materialistic. The most successful person is the guy who has the biggest house, the fastest car, and the most expensive wardrobe. Other cultures might not value people who are successful in business at all, rather viewing people who (say) serve in the red cross as being successful, even if their pay
If you fail to wag your tail if you have none, is that really a failure? I was going to be confirmed at my local church when I was 12 or so. I went along to confirmation classes. I read all the bible readings. But in the end, I found I just didn't believe in the existance of a God. So I said that, and wasn't confirmed. I didn't see it as particularly desireable, or something I
You have an idea of what personal success is. But being personally successful may be a detriment to other people's success. For example, if you get rich by charging everyone lots for coal rather than charging only what is needed to cover your costs, that may well make you personally successful. You and your family will probably have a great life, at least materially speaking. However, the general level of success might go down, because you make
Ironically, half the time it's been JoeUser causing the problems, although you can't necessarily tell this - they use the same database, and run on many of the same machines, and so if one of them falls over, it can make life very hard on the other site. On the other hand, it means I can post tutorials over at WC and then they appear here - Link - so when it works well, it's all good. <img src="