[quote who="DARCA1213" reply="2" id="3603757"] This December there will be a random event with Santa Claus stuck on a asteroid. Saving Santa will bring back Christmas. Killing him lets you take his powers giving you unlimited range. And forming a alliance with Santa let's you use him as a special small ship to use in battle. [/quote] But let's not forget that a war with Santa, is a war on Christmas... [e digicons]:)[/e]
Borg999
[quote who="Phoon" reply="7" id="3602907"] Odd, I see no smiley in the post. [/quote] In your OP, you referenced my marketing ploy comment (reply #4) which means you were commenting on my second post...which contained smilies...
Here's a flash for you Phoon, When someone uses smilies in a post, it usually means not to take the comment seriously... Now, stand up and slowly pull it out before it gets stuck in there permanently. [quote who="Phoon" reply="6" id="3602860"] Here's a flash for you Borg999, it does the same thing if you sign in using Chrome on a different system too. So, it isn't a marketing ploy at all. It's a good safety measure. <
[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="3" id="3602850"] This is a safety measure for you, Borg999. Better to receive an email than have someone NOT you signing in and you NOT knowing about it. Think about it. [/quote] You see safety measure, I see subtle marketing ploy. [e digicons];)[/e] Considering most people have multiple devices, it's not so unusual... You're just sore about my conflict comment in your thr
I'm using the modern style. I downloaded an app from the Windows store. It wasn't good, so I tried to uninstall it. I selected "universal apps" from the start menu and then right clicked on the program. There was no option in the sub menu to uninstall that app. When I switched back to Win 10 style, the option to uninstall the app was available.
Today, I got an email from Google stating "Someone used Firefox to sign into you Google account". Oh, no, maybe I should only use Chrome to sign in [rolling eyes smiley] ...Oh, Yea, it was me, and I did it less than an hour ago... As if Google didn't know that Firefox was being used to sign in to the account from the same computer I use all the time.
Yea, I agree with Some1, Start10 works better, and is easier to use than Classic Shell on Windows 10. While, I'm here, I have a suggestion for SD... Include classic Windows Explorer/File explorer versions with Start10. There are plenty of Windows explorer alternatives available, but I bet SD could do a better job than most.
Just keep in mind that such a program may cause conflicts with any AV/internet security program you currently have installed.
This thread had been hijacked. The OP did not intend to discuss privacy, but rather ease of use, and the lack of need for supliment programs to enhance it's functipnality.
I agree with FL. Win10 is easy to use. There really isn't an urgent need for start 10 like there was for start 8. I think this would be a good opportunity to add a few more bells and whistles to the program. Give people additional reasons to buy it.
No, I haven't picked it up, but I'm interested. Have they resolved the issues that plagued the first game?
Yea, the naming convention is politically motivated, but the mechanic makes sense. I wouldn't worry about it.
Was the issue with units just going off and starving themselves, even though there is plenty of food stored ever fixed?
Double post...
[quote who="tilyas89" reply="14" id="3601144"] Incorrect. They don't just blindly make a release then budget for updates on the fly. Before releasing a game, if Frogboys comments towards LH and galciv are of any indication, they always have a budget set aside for updates until a certain point. If they do not support a product fully after launch, regardless of its performance, they will lose customers and their reputation. Regardless, I'm not sure where you guys are getting this w
Thete is little economic incentive to allocate resources on something that generates little or no revenue. So, it may be a while before they do anything with SK.
It may be more realistic, but when playing a game, I personally value fun and engagement over realism. BTW, opinions that differ from yours are not automatically knee jerk reactions. [quote who="Seafireliv" reply="5" id="3600957"] Quoting Borg999, reply 4 I don't like the idea of retreati
I don't like the idea of retreating. It reminds me too much of Civ V where you have to battle an enemy unit several times before one wins. A retreat mechanic will have the same effect for GC III.
While your argument for bombardment makes sense, it would be very unbalancing. Essentially, the first species to develop long range ships and weapons would permanently dominate the game, making game play linear and formulaic, as there would only be one path to winning.
West point scholarship? He's a liar. Creationist? He doesnt have a firm grasp on reality. Go ahead and vote for him, but be careful what you wish for.
Hell No! The wheel must go! [e digicons]:)[/e]
Yea, with all the discussion going on about the wheel, I thought this might be a good refresher. [quote who="Jafo" reply="1" id="3599293"] Nothing really new there...[e digicons];)[/e] [/quote]
Some interesting points. http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/psychology-fanboy-why-you-keep-buying-same-stuff-8C11162082 http://kotaku.com/why-fanboys-act-like-jerks-1563379006
There is at least one GCIII wiki available. I'm at work and can't post a link, so just Google it.
Where is the camera located in the Xbox? [quote who="RavenX" reply="27" id="3583602"] Did you know the police have the capability to use your Wii or X-Box to look inside your home? That's not conspiracy bullshit, it's very possible and [/quote]