Ordinarily I'd say Firefox is "safer" than IE in respect to spyware stuff most people get through ActiveX and popups. Stardock trialware is featured on download.com. Wasn't it download.com that for a time had the option of using their download manager software? I've never used it and don't see it on the site now, but was dubious about it. The spyware makers are getting very sneaky (hiring trojan makers to better foist their crud on people's PC's) and one has to be careful. Fo
sig101
A goodly portion of spyware is picked up browsing with IE (or an IE shell browser) with low security settings. Don't allow ActiveX and scripting on all sites, only really trusted sites. When you enable ActiveX controls (even some marked as "safe") to download and run scripts you are literally allowing programs to quietly download to your computer without your knowing it or knowing what they are or what they might do. So knowingly downloading programs that later turn out to contain spyw
Or even "plethora."
AVG is lighter in resources, but not as good in over all detection as McAfee or Kaspersky. Although years ago I wouldn't touch McAfee with a barge pole. It's better now, although both McAfee and Norton borg PC's. (I use NOD32 for an AV and BOClean for trojans.) [Message Edited]
Are the lines actually moving or just wavy looking but static? I recently saw some real weird stuff right before my monitor died. So that's one possibility as carolelee mentioned. Ordinarily I'd say it's likely not WB causing it. But what about when you aren't running WB and are using either the Classic or Luna style "skin." Does it appear ok and normal? <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/
Ah, well since the UN missed that little bit of unpleasantness in Rwanda a few years back, I rather doubt the closure of a internet chat board thread would warrant much regard. I'd warrant not even Amnesty International or the ACLU would give a toss, so to speak. Meanwhile, I wonder what happens when one goes over to the "dork side." (HG had one of the best lines in the thread so far IMO, even if
Take your pick. Most likely one of the ones who you see most often participating on the messageboard. Since Jafo (who is an Admin/mod) already commented in this thread you can consider whether or not you wish to further continue the conversation in private.
How to contact an admin/mod from your previous thread that yrag linked to: #8 by sig101 - 2/21/2004 8:34:31 PM You'd be better off emailing a mod (see the "about" section on the left hand side of the page). This is the recomended approach since the opening of this sort of discussion in a public forum invites comments, judgments, etc from the membership at large that you may not appreciate. A glance at similar threads here by other wall submitters will show what I mean. <b
Why is it that most people who bring up "freedom of speech" haven't a clue what it's about? Amendment 1 of the US Constitution: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." Has nothing to do with privately owned message boards. And not all pu
I referenced WebMD because it is a good source of information and education. Not as a substitute for a doctor (a good one that is) or tests. But for someone who has gone to a doctor and still apparently doesn't know much about high blood pressure or its risks after it nearly kills him, it is a resource to learn more. And education needs to start somewhere...it's not always or even often provided by doctors. The more you know on the subject the better prepared you are to talk to your doctor and g
Well read up on it and learn about high blood pressure and what you can do about it. It most definitely is something not to be taken lightly. The WebMD site I posted a link to above is a good resource for medical info.
Holy moly! Glad you're still with us. Not something to fool around with. Here's the link to WebMD. Search on high blood pressure. http://www.webmd.com Lots of info there. [Message Edited]
latin4567: If you can't get in touch with an author then you can't get permission to use his/her work for anything other than personal use. Which means you do not have permission to legally modify and distribute the author's work. It really is that simple. Authors are not under any obligation to make themselves available to others or to grant permission to others to use/modify their work for purposes of distribution. Perhaps the author might also post work at another site and may have
Hmn...that should read a "msstyles skin" rather than "StyleXP skin," Styl skinner.
Stumpy speaks!
Yes, what NightTrain said. Too often abusive relationships involve some sort of co-dependency thing. So while someone may go to friends for consolation and commiseration, often the advice for a solution-get the heck out and stay out of the relationship-is not what really they are looking for when they talk to others. And they come up with all sorts of rationales for staying in such a relationship. As the old saying goes, you can take a horse to water... As NT said, give her the number
Stumpy's a man of few words, but I second his emoticons. And your post too, Lady Aarielle.
As usual I didn't have a clue. How terribly frightening and awful that must have been. But very glad that things appear to be turning out well. Best wishes for her speedy recovery and to you both.
XP SP2 will not have an AV scanner. It has a monitor that will detect if you have an AV installed and running. More info: http://www.betanews.com/article.php3?sid=1077727792
Yes, well what's good taste to one may not be good taste to another, whether we're talking art or cuisine. For instance, presumably someone must think those velvet Elvis paintings are tres chic.
ooch, hellish911, you're the Howard Dean of skinning discussions, aren't you? j/k Not quibbling with your ideas per se, but jeez you'd probably could incite more interest for some one to work with you if you exercised a tad more tact. Although you do appear to like some of essorant's work so that
The best way to "light a fire" under others in this field IMO is to lead by example and provide alternative styles in various works. Since it appears you have skills why not give it a try? Or collaborate with a willing skinner if one is interested. (Many do help others here, especially if someone has an interesting project.) Oddly enough, some styles that you now find so ordinary and repetitive were once upon a time innovative and new. <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smile
Actually, knowing past practice, they appear to find amusement at the way you presented your request. I rather suspect your comments would get a more positive reaction from skinners here if you hadn't referred to much of their work as "bubbled garbage heaps." Funny how some people don't take kindly to having their work characterized in such an insulting fashion. There actually are a number of clean, minimalistic skins for WindowBlinds and other apps. You just have to look. I
Rebooting makes no difference here, unfortunately. Although I too have found rebooting is answer for many mysterious ailments. YAY, winkies! (Maybe they rebooted the server. <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/sm