[quote who="Morlark" reply="1" id="2684836"]Somewhere in C:\ProgramData\Stardock\Elemental - War of Magic\Temp\English, I'd imagine. Sovereigns and units you can build are in CoreUnits.xml. Not sure which file enemies are in, but I didn't look very hard.[/quote]I hate how files for a single game is spread all across the computer these days. That said, I managed to find C:\ProgramData\Stardock\Elemental - War of Magic , but there's no \Temp\ folder to b
Luckmann
[quote who="Zazimire" reply="41" id="2684685"] [...] Will visual studio 2008 mod games and will there be a forum for that? -Jeremy Sr.[/quote] *brain breaks* [e digicons]o_O[/e]
As I've had it explained to me, create faction functionality was moved to the modding tools. Unfortunately, the modding tools isn't added until Beta 4. So yes, custom factions have effectively been removed as of now. Which is unfortunate, because the game appears to be running stable for me now.
I will be unapologeticly double-posting in this thread once in a while to "bump" it, instead of silently editing previous posts, allowing new stuff to go unnoticed. As always, all my avatars are completely up for grabs. [img]http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/2376/elementalcustomcrest006.png[/img] [img]http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/6965/elementalcustomcrest007.png[/img] [img]http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/8824/elementalcustomcrest008.png[/img] [img]http://img51.imagesha
This might be a long shot. Odds are that they're hidden or packaged away somewhere. Just got the latest beta patch. Things actually seem to be running pretty stable, for a change. I even managed to make a Sovereign without things crashing. Since the faction creation function has been taken out, to be part of the modding tools in Beta 4 (goddamn), I thought I'd screw around with the basic .xml-files. Not just to make my own faction/nation/kingdom, but also to yoink that crown o
[quote who="Frogboy" reply="1" id="2684637"]:) Well, we're out. We hope you like this build.[/quote]Give me my faction creation/customization back! [e digicons]:(O[/e] Cheers. Awesome, solid work. ;)
[quote who="Fuzzy Logic" reply="37" id="2684644"]Will somebody please remove this infant from the forums. I can't take much more of this shite...[/quote]We don't have anything to formally charge him with, yet! Unfortunately! [e digicons]:(O[/e]
Empire/Kingdom creation still locked? [e digicons]:pout:[/e]
[quote who="S J N" reply="11" id="2684348"] [...] It is illegal to drive without shoes. [...] [/quote]Wait, what? How does that even make sense?
Updating omg omg omg omg omg omg. :D Edit: Bah, double-post. :|
[quote who="Faelyn" reply="13" id="2684556"]no update yet. Probably all went to bed.[/quote]Nah, they're sticking around for the staging. It's coming up soon. :)
[quote who="BernieTime" reply="116" id="2684527"]I wonder if Stardock staff is fueled by Mountain Dew, Monster, or Bawls?[/quote]Mountain Dew.
Gleeeeeeeee wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
Nakor > build compiling Luckmann > Wiiiii
[quote who="Frogboy" reply="106" id="2684440"]When we finish, we're going to bed. :)[/quote]Man, that basic smiley will never cease to creep me out. It's like it's on crack or something. :p
Get a weblog. [quote who="MagicwillNZ" reply="6" id="2684311"]Well... you seem to be harmless.[/quote]Yeah, don't they all? Until they try to eat your dog and steal your jeans.
[quote who="Tasunke" reply="98" id="2684397"]WINDMILLS off the coast is so much better than Oil Rigs ... Wouldn't you rather see a giant field of Windmills in the barely visible distance? Than have to rely on gasoline at all (visible or not)? If no ... then I guess you don't like Windmills (or windpower).[/quote]Well I don't. Because they suck. Suck!
Getting late, I see. [e digicons]XD[/e]
[quote who="StevenAus" reply="83" id="2684333"]Well, it's almost midnight in Stardock land. If they've been working since 9 am... Best regards, Steven. [/quote]They have. And they crunched yesterday aswell, afaik.
*does a bit of a happy dance*
[quote who="Marks1381" reply="3" id="2684124"]Really dude? Are you kidding me?[/quote]Wait, what? What'd he do? I'm usually quick to pick on the new guys, but all he really did was point out a tiny spelling mistake on the site. He's not screaming incoherently about it. Just pointing it out. And he's entirely right in saying that it looks unprofessional, even if we all know that Stardock is anything but (unprofessional, that is). That said, I can't find the section either. :p</
[quote who="Zazimire" reply="38" id="2683608"]Can anyone Give this post what I call "Cautionary Fellowship"? -Jeremy Sr.[/quote]I have no idea.
[quote who="Fuzzy Logic" reply="27" id="2683597"]This thread is a perfect example of why some parents should be made to use contraceptives...[/quote]I've always been a strong proponent of retroactive abortions.
[quote who="Wizard1956" reply="34" id="2683483"]What, English to Gibberish?[/quote] Well, you've got to be kidding me. I've been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It's just common sens