[quote who="Zazimire" reply="14" id="2683468"]You respect my opinion I respect (less all the time) your opinion but if your in my head or around me thru thick and thin I subdue all opposition. to thinking with what we have. -Jeremy Sr.[/quote]... What.. what is wrong with you...?
Luckmann
[quote who="Jafo" reply="30" id="2683440"]It's English [barely], but for the life of me it's random quasi-related words strung together to form a sentence.[/quote]Yeah, he's been doing that all over for the past few days. I'm not sure if I'm annoyed or amused. :p Has anyone really been far as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
[quote who="Tasunke" reply="28" id="2683432"]But there ARE invisible pink unicorns ... you just haven't noticed them yet [/quote]Prove it! [e digicons]:(O[/e]
[quote who="Tasunke" reply="11" id="2683423"]so many quotes, so little grammar, yet each time a point to be made.[/quote]Points are overrated. Also, every sentence should begin with a capital letter.
[quote who="Annatar11" reply="26" id="2683417"] At least there are Wendersnaven.[/quote]But no birthday Yarlens.
[quote who="Wintersong" reply="22" id="2683366"]Why must units die when they reach 0 HP? Why do the citizens need food? Why...? :p[/quote]I'm lamenting the fact that there are no invisible pink unicorns.
Are we there yet? It's 13:20 here, I still haven't slept, I'm on my third beer and I need something to do.
Elaborate.
[quote who="Wintersong" reply="15" id="2683226"]Procipinee uses Diaper Strike on Sand Golem. Sand Golem's morale broken. Sand Golem scapes. Procipinee wins +3 Exp. Baby wins +3 Exp. Baby levels up.[/quote]
[quote who="Wintersong" reply="395" id="2683211"] [...] And I don't mind avatar clones and/or offshoots. The nick above the avatar is still "unique".[/quote]But.. but.. The avatar is the suit! The haircut! It has all the style! It's who you are! It defines you as a person! The nickname is weaksauce! [e digicons]:(O[/e]
[quote who="Wintersong" reply="392" id="2683188"] [e digicons]XD[/e] I feel honored that I/it could inspire someone. And why would I be against people using it? [/quote]Beats me. Maybe in case you wanted it yourself? [e digicons]O:)[/e] Although now that I check it, the red is a little bit off, somehow. I wonder how that happened. But meh, it's not like you'll keep an avatar longer than 48
[quote who="zesban" reply="391" id="2683178"]Sweet savory Save Picture As...! That's a lot of avatars. There's enough art assets here to make a veritable collectible pog-type game! Way to go guys![/quote]My E:WoM avatar's folder, consisting entirely of E:WoM avatars I've made (mostly through using game art assets) is 192 files. :D
[quote who="tejondour" reply="3" id="2683172"]Because bandwidth totally grows on trees.[/quote] http://www.wikia.com/Wikia Just to get you started.
[quote who="Wintersong" reply="101" id="2683155"]More???!?!?!??!?!!? [e digicons]8O[/e] [/quote] Egads! :p
[quote who="Myles" reply="11" id="2683100"]Ok, I was taking it from the perspective of an attacking army trying to raze a city, but you're right that a kingdom could very easily abandon a city.[/quote]Alright, that's actually a very fair point. It hadn't really occurred to me. It's fairly important to tear down defensive structures when leaving a settlement, at least in times of war. I'm not sure it should warrant research, still, though. I can think of some stuff being hard to raze,
Allow me to construct Watchtowers and I'm happy.
[quote who="Myles" reply="5" id="2679626"]There's a difference between sacking a city and razing it to the ground.[/quote]In terms of "We, as a nation, does not care for this city at all anymore and will cease any support immediately. Anyone living here will be relocated and/or killed"; No, not really. [quote who="Myles" reply="8" id="2683065"]That doesn't destroy everything though. Maybe if it's a small city than yes, you could just burn down the huts and other small buildings which
Well.. not to be.. umm.. I'm struggling not to be snide, here. But if you want a wiki, you should go make one.
Definitely. Don't really have much to add.
[quote who="KellenDunk" reply="97" id="2682971"]3.5 is the version that got watered down.. 4.0 distilled it. [/quote]*cough* *hack* *wheeze* I just spewed water over my monitor and threw up a little in my mouth.
[quote who="Frogboy" reply="7" id="2682957"]It'll be tomorrow AND it'll be rushed. [/quote]Today is tomorrow here, now. Can we have a countdown? Can we can we can we? [e digicons]:pout:[/e]
I like the Crests. [img]http://img822.imageshack.us/img822/9047/elementalcrest001.png[/img] [img]http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/6620/elementalcrest002.png[/img] [img]http://img696.imageshack.us/img696/6808/elementalcrest003.png[/img] [img]http://img251.imageshack.us/img251/5598/elementalcrest004.png[/img] [img]http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/2226/elementalcrest005.png[/img] [img]http://img693.imageshack.us/img693/3835/elementalcrest006.png[/img] [img]http://img34.images
I'm trying to decide whether that is weird or awesome .
[quote who="Fuzzy Logic" reply="2" id="2682167"]Divine Purpose? I do wish people wouldn't use white text against a white background, only smart asses like me can read it...[/quote]Given that different forums have different backgrounds, isn't that a somewhat fuzzy logic? Zing!
[quote who="psychoak" reply="10" id="2682833"]This is a joke, right? Neither thread actually serves anything but a momentary distraction.[/quote]Yeah, but it disrupts my neat sense of cleanliness. Why can't they be a combined momentary distraction? If something is useless, why can't they be useless in bulk?