I know it will never be high priority, but could you give me feedback on if the scaling issue with the movies will ever be fixed? It does effect how much I enjoy the game, even if it doesn't stop me for playing most of it without issue. Edit: I'd also like to point out the 72 quality planet bug, seems game breaking enough. I take no credit for finding it, so now I'm fireproof (read flameproof ;)). [link="https://forums.galciv2.com/313224/"]Linky[/link].
Sir_On_The_Edge
Have you fixed the problem with the aspect ratios if the movies being stretched? It also happens when in the trade screen. This occurs when you use a wide-screen monitor.
So focus on the ones with similar types. I just want the UK to be done rely.
Ah, one thing that I've forgotten for a long time. But if you could get the movies to keep their aspect ratio it would be soo awesome. This includes the moving pictures of the races as well. This is for people with wide-screen monitors. (I'm playing at 1920*1200 :D)
I'm so glad this patch is working out the way it is. To all the non-believers: :P YOUR SOO WRONG!!!!
Actually spelt "does". :P But speaking on topic, consoles always have more sales than PCs, even RTS/TBS games. If, while you make the game for the consoles you made sure that the updates would be portable. For people with TA on the PC it would be an easy way for you guys to support it further.
Actually, from the 1.02 patch it has changed much, they have also added a new harder (cheating) difficulty. I recommend you give it a go.
I think you should release an expansion pack, call it the world politics expansion or something. The groundwork for the engine is done already. The UK, Germany, France and Russia all come to mind but I would not just do Europe, Mugabe would be a very interesting person to play as and against. I know it means a lot more work but pick countries with interesting situations and or have a large gaming populace. I probably won't be buying the game unless you do this, perhaps a standalone
Woo, all my qualms about how much this patch will actually do have been satisfied. The only problem left with the game is coming up with some compromise code for the tech inflation. Definitely better without it at the moment though.
Was just about to ask for a Stardock representative to give us an official response to these problems. Unfortunately for me a representative got there a day before. Bravo.
As it is it's very fun, plus they will keep on supporting it for ages. So go and buy it already!
Was about to post what kyro said without the statistics. Wow, 9 people? I'll then condense my statement so I don't have to repeat what you said so much. Anyway, I'm always angry at companies, like EA, that don't support there products as they have plenty of people to do it (often over 40), if you honestly want stardock to completely stop work on the next game then I'd expect you to pay money for that work. The next game will allow the company to survive, give you hours of entertainm
[quote]So then we should steal food from the restaurant just because they might not be giving us an honest sample?[/quote] YES! (best idea ever)
This has nothing to do with customer service.
What? Because they decide to release a patch for a game that tweaks it slightly to make the end-game smoother you deside that it's the end of the world and star-dock is to blame. The "bug" is not a game breaker in any scene of the word. Ether justify what you have said (for there is very little that I can see in your post) or leave this community a better place, i.e. without you. P.S. Flame for a flame I always say
They said in 1.1 that they were going to add more artefacts. Or at least would like to. (can't remember the exact words used)
It's decided it won't let me edit my last post so: " 10) NO MINES! the idea of mines in space is relatively laughable. Just think in 3d people!!" Actually if they were close to the planet it could work.
They did say that at some point they were going to add more artefacts and anomalies in a patch.
Sins is the only RTS that I've had to start on the easy setting to play. I'm now on the hard setting and it's a challenge but is still beatable which is what I want in a game. Just because you have an inflamed ego from easy normal settings doesn't mean the game is balanced wrong if you loose first time. Not having a campaign? I'm happy with that because they are releasing more maps with the patches and patch 1.1 is said to add "lots" (have not looked this up so don't ask).
I'll probably get it after I see a review and play the demo. Normally I'd trust stardock but in this case It's not the sort of game I usually play. Or have ever played.
So what's gonna be in 1.1?
Well, you can come across as aggressive. But every time you do you seem to justify it so whatever. Honestly I have known many worse people then you in power over forums and such. Your not a bad guy, your just not subtle.
just go into the options you get before you start a game
Later on it would be nice if you could give us a list of the things you will "try" to work on. Make sure you point out that not everything asked will be possible and that you can't do everything. I can only imagine the flaming otherwise...
I love you guys!!!