[quote who="ahmadou" reply="135" id="3187784"]Yeah, getting boring in here Civ 5 exp. is super entertaining though. But FE beta 4 is going to wipe the floor with every known 4x in existence. [/quote] Highly doubtfull
[quote who="Mortenart" reply="131" id="3187458"] The game is really coming along - apart from one massive game-breaker - the enemy's champions keep coming back, making it impossible to defeat any enemy. Please lose this crazy mechanism, by which all champions are immortal. I don't mind losing mine, as long as the enemy loses theirs. I had to quit the game I was playing, because they just kept coming at me - it's ludicrous.
[quote who="Souls-Stream" reply="33" id="3183839"](especially after the failure of Warlock: master of the arcane lol ) [/quote] It Failed? Well the Warlock: master of the arcane I have is a damn good game. Perhaps we are playing different games.
[quote who="Heavenfall" reply="14" id="3183750"]1) If outposts are going to flip, please give us something like militia to defend them against scouts, pioneers and those level 1 crappy demons summoned for Resoln. Otherwise it is going to be micro hell. Suitably, that militia would upgrade as you research warfare/magic tech like city militia do. 2) You want us to have multiple cities, fine. But we don't like cityspam. How are you going to keep the amount of cities "several" but
[quote who="Mtrixis" reply="3" id="3061374"]Heroes not dying isn't a problem, it's a design decision - I think the 'penalties' from dying are pretty elegant actually, and the enforced multi-turn out of comission is also a worthy penalty. If you don't think so, play on the higher difficulties - the AI simply isn't aggressive on normal, but above that, you can lose cities due to heroes being out of comission. I'd rather have the penalty system t
My list would be: 1) NAVEL UNITS A MUST IN 4X GAMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I don't understand why people would not want this. And sea monsters of coarse. As it stands the maps feel very small and underwelming. And with the naval units should come navy combat (Tactical Battles.) 2) Other worlds like in AOW or MOM (and even Warlock) would be great (Again I fail to understand why anyone would not want this in the game.) These type
So is this more like homeworld or like Starcraft (click fest?)
I would not have bought Sins at all if it was not on Steam. And by the way you can run Steam games in offline mode. So this concern you have is a moot point. You have to log into steam once and change setting to offline mode. Then from that point on until you want to change it you can run offline.
[quote who="arkhometha" reply="224" id="3175339"] Quoting Pheace, reply 223 You *need* to be online at some point to do the checks, but this stuff is initial setup, not *every time* I didn't say you need to be online every time. I said that to get Steam to work on offline mode you have to be online first, as you admited, and that being necessary to go online for you to activate offline mode defeats the purpose of offline mode. I hav
[quote who="Jalicos" reply="209" id="3174338"]I can't seem to log in to do the survey, so I'll just post my answer here: I do not use Steam, and will not buy any game that requires it. Valve is a wonderful game developer with some really great games, but Steam's DRM still goes too far. For online-only games it's not bad, but banning people from singleplayer is a dick move. Even if I trust Valve not to abuse that little feature, there's no guarantee they won'
[quote who="GFireflyE" reply="194" id="3174117"] Quoting Frogboy, reply 189 Let me preface this that as a former OS/2 user, I can out-kook pretty much anyone. Now, that said, running a business is remarkably similar to playing a strategy game. Seriously. If an idiot like me can build a business from his dorm room into one generating tens of millions of dollars each year, you can probably assume that a lot of the so-called skills involved are very simila
Can you tell those of us who have not encountered this what this is please ...... pretty please with sugar on top :)
[quote who="Ausland" reply="2" id="3173598"]In essence, it produces essence, which is essential. [/quote] That makes it all clear. Your mastery of the English language holds no bounds. After I read your response all the mysteries of the universe, Who are we? Why are we here? How many licks does it take to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop? Have been answered.
[quote who="UmbralAngel" reply="17" id="3173541"]I am looking forward to this. I liked how Warlock had lots of variety in bonuses you could attatch to your city, while the only unique thing about your city in Fallen Enchantress is your city level up buildings. Those are pretty bland in most cases, so I never get get attatched to my cities. [/quote] Same here Warlock is a very good game. The only two down sides to it currently is the bland magic system (I only use 4 spells) and th
[quote who="Gammit10" reply="14" id="3170754"]So beta 4 should re-work the city building. Yet, I would easily pay $30-40 for this game now. I can't wait to see how it gets better. [/quote] No the game is not worth even $20 yet. Still a ways to go before it gets to that point.
[quote who="Glowing_Ember" reply="15" id="3170483"] By all means i would like to see some traits only available to small units sizes, and some traits available only to large unit sizes, as well as faction only traits. In addition to this, it would be neat if smaller unit sizes got xp faster than large unit sizes. I think with some rules like this you could make some really unique things in this game happen. [/quote] No XP should not be faster for any unit no m
[quote who="Tibor2000" reply="3" id="3171257"]It is Lord Xia, but thats copy written. I'm being original. LOL [/quote] It's a custom faction the copy right laws would not apply here unless you tried to sell it.
[quote who="harpo99999" reply="168" id="3171654"]if steam is so wonderful, WHY did it take 12 hours to download and install rebellion beta on a new computer (btw I have a 8mbit connection) the download speed averaged at 25 Kb/s on a 8Mbit connection, and can routinely dwnload at 800kBYTE/sec when downloading a single file, and the PEAK sped was 48kb/s as reported by steam. if a slow web browser like IE can hit 800KByte/sec WHY CAN'T STEAM???? harpo [/quot
[quote who="askjosh" reply="157" id="3171134"]I think you should make it available for purchase on Steam, Stardock, and GOG that way everyone is happy On a side note if it was released on steam I would probably buy a copy even though I got it for free just to show you my support and because I like having my games on steam. [/quote] You do know that you can register your game with Steam without having to buy it again.
We had some great Hash back in Nam. :)
[quote who="Lonemessiah" reply="149" id="3170548"]And now Steam corrupts your system! So a round up of why Steam is evil:- It corrupts perfectly good systems It will stop you from getting a job It will start to take photos of you to check it is you that is playing It forces you to play Lord of the rings Online... Online It will steal all of your games without any warning It will attach electrodes to your gonads (ok t
[quote who="Lonemessiah" reply="143" id="3170081"] Quoting LORD-ORION, reply 137 - They are no better then Facebook or Linked-in for compiling pieces of personal information and selling it. You should be affraid that a potential employer will one day be able to put the pieces of the jig saw puzzle through the personal info traders and see your logged hours in a game service and not hire you. So now it will be Steam'
Stardock Forums
[quote quoting="post"]Considering that power ranking seems to be what the AI uses to evaluate its ability to face you, it needs to be accurate, but right now, that rating seems to think that if a faction can just get enough companies of spearmen, they can threaten that 50-defense champion. To give an extreme example, I have a level 67 hero (through Paragon abuse) with 100 attack, 70 defense, 231 HP, 88 dodge, and 217 spell resist. My power ranking? 137. Given that this
[quote who="Malsqueek" reply="8" id="3169681"] Quoting GFireflyE, reply 6 Agreed. Really like the thought process you put together here. Hence, a party of 3 would gain experaince faster than a group of 5 because fewer troops have to do more work. The flip side, of course, is that if you are able to put in the time into the larger groups, their combat output can become significantly better. Exactly the rationale behind the suggestion.
[quote who="joasoze" reply="1" id="3169413"]Good work there. The easy solution would be allowing us to upgrade unit sizes. The groups with 3 members that I use early game, I get quite attached to and want to keep. I think we should (for a price) be allowed to upgrade, but that the group should go down two levels (or something like that) to indicate that you have added rookies to your experienced group. Easy and elegant methinks [/quote] Bingo!!!
You're about to visit an external site:
Sign up here to get the latest news, updates, and special offers delivered directly to your inbox.
