I read it last semester as it was required for a course. Man, I hate monologues, not to mention cheesy romance. That was 1,000 pages of torture. Ironically, I remember bringing up this book in another thread recently, because I do think it is an accurate take on what socialism in the US would look like. However, I don't think that objectivism is a sound philosophy that will solve the problem, as it is presented in the book. The reason I think that is the fact t
Audiafox
Yes Leauki, you have addressed my points. You simply keep repeating something I already argued against before - replies #529 and #530 prove that much - and I for one am tired of quoting myself over and over just because you don't remember what I said earlier.
Leauki, once again you're not listening to anything I have said. This is why I stopped arguing before.
Artysim, I understand your position on saying that two wrongs don't make a right, but I think in this case you are wrong. The reason every nation has a military is to protect itself from attacks, and to respond appropriately to them. If Israel was willing to merely sit down and take the attacks from Hamas without a problem, what incentive do they have to stop attacking? What would other anti-semites in the region begin to think upon seeing that such a blatant attack could g
That doesn't make them right, or you right by extension. Even if schools are not part of the public square, the government is limited in many ways that the average citizen is not. The government cannnot violate the Constitution under any circumstances, regardless. The Constitution was made to restrain the government, not people. Our government was based on this Constitution, and if we ignore it, our government will not work properly. The Constitution says that
Leauki, the Founding Fathers would never have written a Constitution that "forced" the government to outlaw prayer in schools. The plain text suggests the exact opposite. I'm not sure how you can read the first amendment and come to that conclusion. Then again, I'm not sure how you came to various other conclusions as well. Besides that, prayer was not outlawed in schools until the 1960's. The country went on just fine before then, which shouldn't be possible i
Except the government is prohibited from doing so by the Constitution. There is no contradiction in what I am saying.
There is no right to demonstrate your sport of choice. :CONGRAT: I am not arguing that people can't limit others with rules on their own property. However, Congress did pass a law against professing religions in the classroom. That is what I'm arguing against. And I am allowed to profess my religion anywhere. If that offends someone on their property, it is also their privilege to kick me off.
[quote who="IQofSpam" comment="488"]I have a perfect right to profess my religion to anyone, anywhere, and that includes public schools.[/quote] [quote who="Leauki" comment="492"]Where does the constition say that? [/quote] [quote who="IQofSpam" comment="488"]Amendment #1 to the US Constitution: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the
Any truth can be twisted and/or misunderstood to be a lie. Don't be too quick to assume you're the one who is right. And Leauki, freedom from religion is NOT a Constitiutional right. Amendment #1 to the US Constitution: [quote]Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to ass
4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42 ... Wait, and 108. There's something significant about that one too. ... No, actually, I'm not a fan. I don't care that much. It was them! They did it, not me! Quit repeating them over and over!
[quote who="watertown1978" comment="7"]You know there is a nice person that would do wonders for the country... or even a party, and its not the Rep or Dem right now.... [/quote] Ron Paul? Unfortunately he didn't have a chance in hell because the media hated his guts and wouldn't give him coverage for any price, and because he rarely got invited to debates of any kind, and because lazy people like handouts which he said in no uncertain terms that he would not give them.
Hmm, Brad, getting involved in stereotyping are we? Shame on you. [e digicons]:hrmph:[/e]
My New Year's resolution is to not have any New year's resolutions. [e digicons]:-"[/e]
I noticed that the links beneath the OP don't work, they simply refresh the page instead of taking you to whatever article it was talking about. To explain myself better, you have under "Recent Comments by KarmaGirl" a thread called "Squirrel Vittles" which links back to this page, not to the Squirrel Vittles one.
Of course, the Republicans aren't too much better than the Democrats when it comes to turning our country into the next Soviet Union. Bush ignored the bailout plan when he could have vetoed it, in essence tacitly agreeing to it. And yes, I agree Moderateman, the Democrats definitely make a point of the "vote for me and I'll give you [insert random lie here]." There isn't a thing that Obama has said that FDR or others hadn't said before him, especially that universal health
Hmm... yeah I forgot that not everyone uses a flat rate/unlimited bandwidth plan. My mistake.
Hey Sole Soul, thanks for the *.zip link for all of us whiners. You get karma for that! I have to say though, this *.zip versus *.rar debate is rather silly, at least for this particular example. By placing it in an *.rar archive, you've limited its usefulness, because it is guaranteed that someone won't be able to open it - and it was done for a whopping 1.2 MB. I have to ask, is it really worth it?
When Christians are fired and/or otherwise oppressed for their beliefs, such as not being allowed to so much as pray in a school, that is definitely leaning more toward communism than our 'free' country. I'm sorry, but by telling people that they are not allowed to pray just because you have to keep church and state 'separate' is a direct violation of our right to freedom of speech. The last I checked, freedom from hearing others speak wasn't a right. Not only that, b
I don't like WinRAR or any of those compression tools, and I don't want any of them on my computer, thank you. It really irritates me when something this useful comes out, something I'd like to use, and it's in an *.rar archive. Please, give us a *.zip option. By the way, that tech tree viewer will be amazing. I sure get tired of opening up GalCiv2 just to look at my tech tree.
Your stories are old. [e digicons]:hrmph:[/e]
"I hate you! We're about to be blown to kingdom come, and you're sitting there teasing us!" "ST-4, the survival plan for a massive submarine hull breach is to run as far from the hole as possible. You can try it if you like, over." "Houston, I hope our fallout kills you!" "Roger that ST-4. Appropriate precautions have been taken against this scenario, over." "... I'm going to radio the Chinese and tell them you launched a nuke at them!" "Come ag
This topic is a joke. How can you claim to be scientific and yet just fling mud everywhere? Is that a rational and scientific way to get your point across?
God bless you for being such a very charming person, Daiwa.
[quote who="Leauki" comment="414"]Creationists also believe that by demonstrating how lifeforms to not come to be from thin air, they have disproven evolution. That's the weird part. [/quote] Well, of course it is weird to you, you think that creationism and evolution are totally unrelated. Of course, I might remind you that it was you who brought up evolution in the first place, in the original post, as being a superior alternative to creationism. That