Screenshot of sova destroying 1 of 2 skirantras.
Agent of Kharma
Jesus man, where do the assholes in this community come from? Why do you keep attacking me out of the blue? I already told you I didn't play you, and that wasn't my game, but just for the sake of argument, WHY THE HECK DOES IT MATTER? And why the heck do you need a replay? I said I couldn't build repair because he took out the builder. But either way, WHAT THE HELL DOES REPAIR HAVE TO DO WITH MY POINT THAT VASARI CAPS ARE OUTMATCHED AGA
[quote]Have you tried a kortul?Even 2 kortuls since you had a 2v1 there?A level 2 or 3 kol will be pretty nasty against a sova.Eliminating its am or disabling sc while it heals itself and deals good damage to the sova.A kortul and a skirantra would be awesome as well.[/quote] I tried Kortuls in a test last week against Advent Halcyons. I told my opponent to come with Halcyons before the game started (which he usually does anyway). The Kortuls were crushed by the bombers even tho
[quote]one more thing the sova is a combat cap, it is designed to do tonnes of dmg. the skinantra is a support cap as all of its abilities focus on helping the fleet. the argument about caps should be able to beat each other is not valid, because different caps have different rolls, the sova is ment to deal dmg, the skinantra is ment to have an unkillible SC presence.[/quote] [quote]Thats what I was trying to say.As fleets grow the sova becomes less and less effe
[quote]Please! Someone do the math! How long would it take for the first single cell of Life to come about by random means, and to evolve from its first state of being? Then, how long would it take to 'evolve' a second cell that was necessary to its own existence - when none was required before (mitosis to meiosis)? How long would it take, by random mutations, to evolve into a second viable life-form? Or a third, or fourth...?[/quote] They don't have enough time in the lifetime of the
[quote]'Designed and built', by whom - or by what?[/quote] Who the heck knows? At this point you leave the realm of rationalism, science, etc. and enter the realm of pure conjecture, philosophy, etc. Fine stuff, I just make sure not to mix my rationalism or science with any of it. [quote]But, 'designed and built' would infer an intelligence. So while you may not have used the phrase 'Intelligent Designer', your use of the phrase "an "intelligent design" theory" wou
[quote]Science *is* taught and practiced both critically and objectively, now moreso than ever before....[/quote] LOL, embarassingly false. Easily demonstrated to be so, but until after the new year, I simply don't have time to cite examples. Right now I just have 1 or 2 minutes in the day to check email and read a few web posts, so live in your own world and believe what you want.
[quote]There is. Want me to link you to some, so you can explain how they all fit under the umbrella of your "intelligent designer" theory?[/quote] Nope. I've seen anything and everything you would link, time and time again, ad nauseum. There isn't anything you would link that I haven't seen. We would simply do what we are doing now, i.e. disagree down the line on everything. Even worse, I could just link and throw stuff back to you, forcing you to link and thr
[quote]The above are with absolutely no fleet support, but if you brought in even a single Sentinel, you could easily defeat their fighters.[/quote] No, if you get to bring in something, he gets to bring in something too. Let's keep the tests simple, no need to complicate them - your capship of choice (vasari) vs. his sova (tec). That's what this is really about. I think there is NO capship the vasari can field that will beat his sova and defend your roid. Yo
[quote]I ask you again: if all species suddenly appeared, WHEN DID THEY APPEAR??? [/quote] lifekatana, I said that the fossil record shows life suddenly appearing, "geologically speaking." I DID NOT SAY that the fossil record shows "all species suddenly appearing at the same time." These are two different statements. I said one thing. You think I said another thing. I also said that the "when" is not controversial, and that I accept the same "when" that
[quote]So evolution doesn't make sense to you, but design does?[/quote] Correct. Evolution doesn't make sense to me, because it simply doesn't make sense. But design obviously makes sense to me, because it is a known cause (the only known cause) for complex machines. You can witness design every day. No one disputes that machines come about through design. So we have a known cause (the only known cause) which I can see every day and witness first hand wi
[quote]The Skirantra is a very powerful ship, and I've yet to come across any evidence that it is disadvantaged against a Sova.[/quote] Well I provided my experience. If you are skeptical, try it yourself. Put a lone skirantra against a lone sova (both the same level). Have the sova attack your roid. Try to drive him off with your skirantra. Report your results back here - I want to see them. [quote]As well as repair cloud, the level 6 ability is
[quote]You basically have built in an axiom of sorts, kind of like how physics in essence has 'made up' the law of thermodynamics. This axiom is: "Complex, intelligent things can only be created by another intelligence".[/quote] Not sure I'd call it an axiom, and either way it's not built-in. I didn't just arbitraily up and decide to declare some "truth" to myself one day (design). Evolution simply doesn't make any sense to me. I've studied it as much as an
I think the warning is verbal as well (correct me if I am wrong), but if any other sound or warning gets played, it gets lost and you don't hear it.
I admit that I haven't tried it, so I'm just talking out of my ass here until I do, but I really do think that egg+skirantra gets owned by dual sovas, because a single skirantra can only make 3 or so fighters. This means he will counter your fighters with fighters from one cap, and go bombers with the other cap, and you'll lose. And we have already established that even dual skirantra heal will not overcome dps of a single sova, so you can't rely on heal for anything. A sing
DesConner, that wasn't my game. Now I have to go see one of my girlfriends :-) (busy busy) but I will upload my game tommorrow. To everyone recommending a kortul, sounds good in theory, that's why I tried it in several tests last week against a player nice enough to donate some of his time and play advent against me. A single kortul gets slaughtered against a single halcyon, a dual kortul gets slaughtered against dual halcyons, that's WITH both of them having jam wea
Okay, hypothetical situation. I construct you a map - two starting terrans, with a roid in the middle. Two players of equal skill. You play vasari. The other guy plays TEC. He even tells you what he's coming with up front - a one sova start, or a two sova start. What are you gonna build to counter him and contest the roid? Even TWO skirantras will have to retreat from one sova, so skirantras are out. But you build any other cap, it gets slaugh
[quote]Not really, no. You brought them up, we simply asked you to provide links to what they actually said not your interpretive paraphrasing of what they said. Under the rules you've decided we should follow, their work is entirely irrelevant anyway. Nothing *they* say can be in any way included in the arguments *you* are trying to make.[/quote] But you see, here's where you are wrong. When I've cited someone, I've cited an evolutionist who is on the OTHER side of the issue, a
[quote]Im sorry if i sounded upset in my last post but i just hate it when people misuse the awsomeness of the skinantra[/quote] Nah man, you didn't sound upset. I'M the one that sounded pissed. Your post sounded reasonable. Now Hawk, he always insults me every chance he gets. But I had no problem with anything you said. [quote]for some advice if you are going to get double skinatras get 1 with fighters and 1 with bombers, you can out the fighters on
[quote]Ten yard penalty here. Since we are not allowed to reference anyone else's work, neither are you. You cannot use Darwin or Gould, you must use solely your own work.[/quote] FOOL! They *ASKED* me for those references!
[quote]Sova Aint Overpowered, the fact is you lost due to your incompetence, Spamming two of the same caps is pointless (unless rushing), its too easy to counter, 2 carriers lack firepower againest a fleet etc.[/quote] LOL. First off, I wish you'd tell all the players I play against that spamming two of the same caps is pointless, because that's all I ever see (2 halcyons, 3 halcyons, 4 halcyons, 2 sovas, 3 sovas, 4 sovas, etc.). This is the first game I've played in ages
[quote]We have cited sources that prove evolution.[/quote] I've met quite a few folks in my life that are prone to making bare assertions, but you do it every other word out of your mouth.
[quote]My guess is his first ability was missile batteries?[/quote] Yes. [quote]Perhaps a better idea would've been to choose scramble bombers as your first skill[/quote] No, because then everybody calls me an idiot for fielding bombers when there are fighters around, plus then I don't have repair cloud, which everybody says is "the best heal in the game" and "the reason to choose skirantra." [quote]Also, if you had air superiority, where were your bombers?[/qu
Just finished a game against a TEC on a small map. I was vasari. What's the best early answer for vasari to halcyons or sovas? Near as I can tell, skirantras, so I built 2. Game starts. We both pick up a couple of roids, and meet in the middle at my asteroid. He attacked my asteroid with a single sova, backed by a couple of cobalts. Went straight for the roid, started bombing it. I already had my 2 skirantras there, so they attacked his sova.&
[quote]Wrong, and that's where you prove you don't understand science. A theory starts off as what we could call 'unproven', and then, based on formal analysis and experimental data, can be found to be 'proven false' (what you call 'disproven')[/quote] We aren't really saying anything different here, I just misspoke with the word "disproven" instead of "unproven." Bottom line, I don't feel as if the burden of proof is on me to "disprove" an unproven theory. The burden of p