[quote]There is no difference between science and methodological naturalism (aka scientific naturalism) philisophically or practically.[/quote] Science is science. Naturalist philosophy is naturalist philosophy. The two are different. [quote]I don't think you can deny that the philosophy of science works extremely well.[/quote] I don't. [quote]To help you out a bit, I'll explain the scientific process to you, as it is very simple:[/quote] Uh
Agent of Kharma
[quote]you must try and solve the problem assuming it arise from natural causes - because that's what science is.[/quote] Actually, that isn't science at all. What you are promoting is naturalist philosophy, in the name of science.
[quote]A very primitive cel that came out of amino acids.[/quote] LOL! And you can prove that scientifically? Boy, the stuff people promote in the name of "science." [quote]What do mathematics have to do with this?[/quote] Why isn't it obvious to you that mathematical (statistical) odds and probabilities have a lot to do with whether complex machines will arrive through chance? [quote]YOU CLAIMED otherwise, YOU claimed that the animals just rando
Welcome to multiplayer online :-) At this point the people on my ignore list are literally more than are not being ignored. I stick with the smaller games these days, where I have a shot in hell of having players who aren't asshoeles and who aren't on my ignore list.
[quote]I don't think that's the case, actually. That 'evolutionists' think that way, that is.[/quote] LOL - you need to read some of the responses under this very thread.
[quote]Maybe if you sit there and let missle batteries kill it then sova will beat a halcyon or skirantra but personally I am not going to stupidly sit there and get hit when I can move out of range.[/quote] You can say the same thing about marza missle barrage, fox (I'm not going to stupidly sit there and take it in the face - I'll avoid it or interrupt it), but it doesn't mean it isn't the most powerful damage dealing ability in the game.
Among "pros" with this game, you are the only guy I've run across who thinks that TEC is underpowered compared to vasari.
[quote]Taking a bacterial culture and exposing it to an antibiotic agent does not create a mechanism for tolerance, the mechanism must exist and the genetic basis for tolerance will be present in some percentage of the population. Exposure to a level of the antibiotic that is not immediate fatal to the organism will result in the expression of the "tolerance protein" the non-tolerant bacteria are killed and the culture will show a dramatic selection in favor of the allele. [/quote] T
[quote]Four steps: ... Given those four premises, Evolution is then inevitable.[/quote] LOL. I think you oversimplified it just a tad. [quote]So you think you know it better than experts who studied for years in the subject?[/quote] If you want to make an appeal to authority, fine. But then you also have to bow out of the debate, and sit on the sidelines. [quote]Who or what created the creator?[/quote] The same question can be aske
[quote]I'm really not sure about what's to be done with Missile Barrage. It's so easily countered now[/quote] If you are talking buff, I don't think anything should be done with missle barrage. You say it's easily countered now, but really very little changed except adding capabilities to counter it that weren't there before (disruptive strikes, etc). This was desperately needed. [quote]Though I did some tests a while ago, and a Missile Barrage loses its power arou
[quote]since I'm not a native speaker I have problems wording my posts.[/quote] Okay, I can accept that, and won't hold it against you. [quote]You dont believe in science?[/quote] Yes I believe in science, and never said otherwise. The problem is, people in their "arguments" conflate science with what they are espousing, or what the so-called "scientific" community espouses. The two are not the same. Science is the scientific method. That'
[quote]It onlys ays that evolution has is supported by the scientific community.[/quote] Duhhh... I already know that evolution is supported by the so-called "scientific" community . It's like, who doesn't know that? But why is that relevant, and why should I care? Are you trying to contruct an appeal to authority?
[quote who="lifekatana" reply="62" id="2482884"]HAHAHA. You doubt wikipedia?[/quote] Duhhh... this is just so shockingly dumb, I really don't know where to begin. I mean, what's your argument? That some web page on wikipedia says that I should believe evolution? That's your argument? [quote]Anyway Kharma, you can come and tell me why is evolution false. Coz I'm pretty sure I know more about it than you.[/quote] I can promise you that you're wrong a
[quote]Cap carriers are IMO now overpowered.[/quote] I have my hands full with damn halcyons, but I think all the caps were much deserving of the buff they got, I think the devs finally did something right about the underpowered crapships... uh, capships, and so I am not in favor of nerfing carrier caps. [quote]Skirantra have an AE repair and vasari use it to great avail as they SB rush your hw. They counter the early counter(LRF namely) to the SB rush and they repair the dam
Let us know when you obtain the capacity to make a rational argument.
[quote]oh, im sorry. so you have your own personal viewpoint concerning the origin of species. good luck with that champ.[/quote] Yeah, idiot. If "personal viewpoint" means "didn't come from the bible" and "didn't come from evolutionist brainwashing," then I guess I have my own personal viewpoint. It would be nice if more people had the capacity for such.
[quote]lol, kmarma is a creationist. that explains a lot.[/quote] My views on how we got here are not religiously-based. In fact, nothing about me is religiously-based, so I therefore cannot be a creationist. You are yet another irrational idiot who speaks about things on which he hasn't a clue.
It actually does steal the negative income, making the target planet less "in the red." In other words, it helps the enemy who is being embargoed. I guess this is unintentional, therefore a bug.
[quote]Well why shouldn't it's heal be on par with the mothership?[/quote] [quote]The Skirantra repair is already exceptionally powerful. [/quote] Well I think "powerful" is all relative to the shield restore on the motherhsip. That's what we should be comparing against. [quote]If you want to buff the Skirantra (and I agree with DesConnor, that's already an iffy proposition since it's a powerful capital ship)....[/quote] Well if it is a powerful capita
[quote who="SpeedDemon517" reply="48" id="2482219"]@lifekatana Are you seriously asking us to go to wikipedia? You do know that that website can be altered by ANYONE. Yes ANYONE and EVERYONE has permission to change wikipedia entrys, so while common entrys on there that everybody knows about are going to be true most likely, I dont think going to wikipedia to learn about evolution would be a very smart idea. [/quote] I quit responding to the guy or taking him seriously.&nb
[quote]Evolution is most certainly supported. Claiming otherwise is foolish. Evolution is an observable phenomenon and I can only conclude that your refusal to disbelieve this originate out of personal beliefs.[/quote] LOL. You are like every other evolutionist I've ever heard (not that I expected you to be different). Nothing but ad hominum attacks, and declarations of pure fiat such as "evolution is supported," "claiming otherwise is foolish," and "evolution is an observ
double post
[quote]If we were talking about ten drone hosts (30 squads, about the same cost as two caps, all things considered) then the Kol would on average be dealing triple the damage. The point is that the Kol just gets better and better as more strike craft get fielded.[/quote] It might get better as far as dealing more total damage, but that damage is spread over all the strikecraft. It will be the exact same effect as my two kols hitting the bombers with flak burst in my story above
[quote]It might have been EMP pulse or the guardian might have coincidentaly run out of AM.[/quote] Guardian didn't run out, I used the same guardian to repulse again. The full repulse didn't get off. The ships started to move then instantly froze the second shield restore fired. It was definitely related to shield restore. [quote]are u sure his cobalt DOES NOT HAVE sabotage reactor?[/quote] The guardian fired again 1 second after he stopped repulse w
[quote]No to boosting Skirantra repair- the object should be to encourage diversity in capital choice, not to strengthen the existing stronger choices?[/quote] Well why shouldn't it's heal be on par with the mothership?