deviant art is the official trillian library
migellito
i have the watchmen book.. very cool. yeah, the collections are great if available. some of my faves: xmen - by jim lee xcalibur - one of the best ever spawn vampirella melting pot the occasional ish of heavy metal <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/sb.gif" border=0 ALIGN="absmiddle
ok, we've had the music, cartoons, movies, and tv threads.. let's hear who reads comics, and what they like i tried a couple copies of xmen again the other day, and was actually pretty disappointed in the art.
to get around that paxx, if i'm modifying an existing file, the first thing i do is save the template file with a new name and work on the copy brad's right, standards suck. in modern industry, quantity and timliness is waaay more important than quality. it's such an aggregious insult to the work ethic that made this country a success i'm surprised it's not talked about more. my grandpa
i missed you, so i hacked into your system and put it there hippy.. those cables go two ways you know..
the subscriptions are not a money making thing.. it'd be nice if they were.. lol.. but they're not. it's just one more element working toward the site supporting itself. the kind of bandwidth in use here is verrrry pricey.
or even leave the text totally off.. which is kind of the theory behind iconic systems anyway..
hehe.. with a nick like old crab, i think it's your responsibility to be a wet blanket.. another interesting fact is that the vast majority of signers didn't sign on july 4th, but here and there over the following months.
please make sure your current version is -not- running when you install the new one, then restart your machine.. that should pretty much cover most software
precisely.. it's all one big community. in a community you care about what your neighbors think here at wc, we care about what the da admins think.. not because we have some sort of 'papers' on it, but because we're all in this together :]
someday, advertisers will realize that net ads need to be a combination of tv and print ads. when they realize this, they will also realize that net advertising is much more valuable than they currently think. the backlash from the dot-comet convinced advertisers that, no, people don't buy directly through your little ad like you thought they would. but.. they over-reacted and went too far the other way. it's just as effective as tv or print, and perhaps moreso. net ads coul
heads down! incoming!!
"the stars are right!" i think i actually detected paxx and jafo coming close [close, not meeting] to a neighboring opinion on this.. their points, though not meeting, are seeming to converge a bit. i think this fortells a new golden age of harmony and.. well, maybe not all kidding aside, i have the utmost respect for you both, and relish the opportunity to hear both your views. that said, i'
w.o.m.. i like that last sentence.. honest and polite excellent!
yep ...for example carlitus, since you have an od subscription there's no limit on your downloads. the way most sites are going pay these days is to offer special services for paid subscribers. i think this can probably work. the things which might change this are advertisers waking up to how things really work, and bandwidth costs getting back down to realistic levels. both those could take a
i think it is valid lecrayon.. if a movie bombs at the box office, the studio may not know why, but it's still a valid criticism by the audience. in a judged olympic event, they don't have to explain why they give an athlete a 2.5 or a 9.9, but it's still completely valid. i think everyone 'wants' comments, and often when we want something but aren't getting it, we find a way to label it as unfair. of course, this isn't necessarily the case. not accurate? perhaps not perfec
ok, i changed mine. it's current now wow, 373 minutes of streaming on the old winamp there.. whoa.. hehe
are there any points of interest in the setup screens or dvd play screens or anything? that might be inspiration..
huh? ooh.. sorry.. i uh. i just forget sometimes
ok.. above i asked 'do you feel it's empirically wrong to give low ratings?' most said no, only if it's done maliciously. i think this is far rarer than most may think. i'd bet the vast majority of ratings are given honestly. see a skin you thought was neat, but it was rated low? maybe so. somebody found something wrong with it, that perhaps you overlooked. it happens some sai
you didn't do it yet paul
ah.. i see.. i hadn't noticed, since i don't just click on 'my computer.' i have a link in my quicklaunch for explorer.exe
wow, mine's from last halloween.. i'll change it soon
wow, i'm impressed. big difference here pat