Well, I am aware of that post. I was obviously asking, whether there is more details available. [e digicons]:cylon:[/e]
3 Replies
19,026 Views
jirkaesch
4
Posts
79
Replies
1,442
Reputation
...and what is the ETA? ;)
3 Replies
19,026 Views
Still no administration? Tall vs. wide empires? [e digicons]XO[/e] (Thanks otherwise)
34 Replies
194,423 Views
Looks excellent, Brad! Thanks for the hard work. Any hints on how the administration will work? :)
32 Replies
150,016 Views
Reply to
Galactic Civilizations III is having its 1st Birthday!
in GalCiv III Dev Journals
GalCiv3 Forums
GalCiv3 Forums
Congratulations and thanks for a great game! Would appreciate to enhance administration and politics now, you know, but I am sure you have something great up your sleaves :)
7 Replies
56,411 Views
[quote who="Frogboy" reply="32" id="3635421"] I want to preface this that I really REALLY like some of the design ideas in Stellaris. But I don't want to hear one word about GalCiv III AI being "bad" by anyone praising Stelllaris. I'm not sure you can lose at Stellaris. [/quote] Yeah, the Stellaris AI is currently dumb as hell :) It cannot even be compared with Galciv AI. Hope they will fix it soon.
50 Replies
439,943 Views
Reply to
The Galactic Civilizations III road-map thread
in Galactic Civilizations III
GalCiv3 Forums
GalCiv3 Forums
1.72 = administration? OH YEAH, BABY ;)
121 Replies
734,152 Views
RE: Missing Offers option in the diplomacy screen - see picture bellow. Any idea why it is missing with my allies and not the foes? http://ulozto.cz/xAA92Wi7/diplo-jpg
74 Replies
200,012 Views
Amazing work, pshaw! Just quick question regarding diplomacy: I do not seem to be able to ask my allies to Declare war/Embargo other civ. The option is alltogether missing in the diplo screen. Strangely, it is still there with civs I have bad relationship with (Furious, Hostile etc.). It is bug or an intented change? After all, it surely undermines diplomatic efforts ;)
74 Replies
200,012 Views
[quote who="Frogboy" reply="29" id="3626816"] I got more info. Ashes is hogging all the QA resources. So 1.7 has been submitted to QA but it hasn't passed QA yet. [/quote] Okay, thanks. How about the accompanying DLC, BTW?
55 Replies
213,393 Views
I know I am kind of annoying, but will the new administration system be in? :) BTW Will the mini-constructors be destroyable? How about similar system for trade routes, aka GalcivII?
55 Replies
213,393 Views
Reply to
The Galactic Civilizations III road-map thread
in Galactic Civilizations III
GalCiv3 Forums
GalCiv3 Forums
[quote who="Frogboy" reply="56" id="3625497"] 1.7 is in QA. We are probably going to do a public beta of it in the next week or so since it's a pretty big set of changes. [/quote] Great news, Brad! Is the administration systém going to be in? Thx.
121 Replies
734,152 Views
[quote][updated 2/12] AI players will no longer trade military techs with unfriendly, non-allied human players. You can still trade tech to them or trade techs to another human player. [/quote] Interesting change. Will see how that works! BTW, the red color is really necessary? Isn´t that too much tutorial? P.S.: How about the notorious missing tooltips with tactical speed? :)
12 Replies
872 Views
Hell no. Why do you want to restrict others´ game, when you can turn it off for yourself? What needs to be improved, however, is the diplomacy AI. Sometimes, it feels too exploitative, even on higher difficulties.
43 Replies
200,151 Views
[quote who="Yarlen" reply="35" id="3618645"] Hi all - Apologies, we ran into some Steam config issues on the new expansion pack. I hope to have it worked out with Valve tomorrow. In the meantime, please enjoy the version 1.6 update. [/quote] Yeah, kudos for Stardock for that! At least you tried :) Looking forward to Mercenaries soon ;)
125 Replies
109,729 Views
Great! Gonna try it a bit this evening :) Thx Frogboy.
36 Replies
180,511 Views
[quote who="Gaunathor" reply="24" id="3618449"] Seems like it, according to this post. [/quote] That is great! Gonna test it in the beta right now.
36 Replies
180,511 Views
Confirmed. Good looking 1.6 is on, but na signs of Mercenaries... :/
125 Replies
109,729 Views
Well, I think the only important question now, is whether the Stardock is crunching or not. If it's not, we can easily write off all of the guesses up to next week and enjoy fine weekend without beta :)
96 Replies
650,595 Views
Allright, Brad, 1.7 sounds like a fair dal ;) I am sure we can shape it up during the opt-in. BTW Has the AI hugging been fixed in 1.6? EDIT: 1.7 is due in March, isn´t it?
36 Replies
180,511 Views
Hi Frogboy, thanks, so the administrative resource is really coming? *fingers crossed* ;)
36 Replies
180,511 Views
Well, I hope it finally slips into 1.6 and it won´t become feature "definitely on the list" for further long months. Or worse [e digicons]:rolleyes:[/e] BTW another link that contains some info: http://steamcommunity.com/app/226860/discussions/1/492378806377463182/.
36 Replies
180,511 Views
Yeah, he meant February the 5th :) European style.
96 Replies
650,595 Views
I´ll go with Friday 5/2, 4 PM EST :)
96 Replies
650,595 Views
Well, based on this thread, it does not look so hopeless: https://forums.galciv3.com/474163/page/1/#3609485 Frogboy, can you give us a little hint? Is another potentially great feature moving from "to do" to "done" list? ;)
36 Replies
180,511 Views