One more bug: In planet view, there is no icon for "Mineral Rich"; it looks like a normal plains tile unless you click it.
makeshiftwings
1) If you're really trying to find bugs, you should add a "Submit Feedback" button into the actual game, or at least have some kind of bug report link somewhere on the website. Is this where bugs are supposed to go? A list of known issues would be good too. 2) Bug: In the planet management screen, the mouseover tooltip for the three resources (Manufacturing, Research, Wealth) flickers on and off as I move the mouse; it's hard to get it to stay open to read it
oops, double post
[quote who="Leauki" reply="25" id="2214333"] As for the specific events you are referring to, I am not a Christian and don't believe in the virgin story and I don't believe in a literal parting of a sea either. [/quote] Sorry, got you confused with a different poster. [quote] To be more specific, I take the Bible really literally. [/quote] As I understand it, these interpretations and translation
[quote who="Leauki" reply="23" id="2213628"] What makes Hellenic religion nonsense? Or at least nonsense in a way that living religions are not? I have never seen gods who throw lightning and mate with humans. That's what makes it nonsense. [/quote] Er.... but have you seen gods that part seas and impregnate virgins? I don't quite see how one is more ridiculous than the other. [quote] An
[quote who="Leauki" reply="14" id="2197297"] Religion says god does exist and science will ask for proof. No. Some religions say that a god exists, some say several gods exist, some say that no god exists. Science has nothing to do with it. Science will work in any environment, whether there is a god or not, and whether one believes in gods or not. Insisting on the truth of atheism is just as unscientific as insisting on
[quote who="Leauki" reply="15" id="2190247"] What exactly is your point? Hinduism does not say that Judaism is wrong, Hinduism just says that Judaism is not Indian. For all Hinduism cares Judaism might well be what the creator god has revealed to the Jewish people while revealing something else to the Indian people. Who says everybody must have the same religion? As I mentioned before I also believe that Zoroastrianism is a true religion. I don't really have an opinion on Hind
[quote who="ParaTed2k" reply="6" id="2189410"]Makeshiftwings: My own opinion: "God is man trying to ignore how science does it." If you replace the word "God" with the word "Religion" I'd have to agree with you, at least to some extent. I've talked to religious people who seem to bend over backwards trying to deny anything science has to teach us. One guy said that science can't possibly accurately measure distances in space. When I asked him wh
[quote who="ParaTed2k" reply="12" id="2187799"]"Science is man trying to figure out how God does it"~ ParaTed2k's (Not So) Famous Sayings. ;~)[/quote] My own opinion: "God is man trying to ignore how science does it." ;)
[quote who="Star Adder" reply="1" id="2187195"]Folks, lula is beyond reasoning. Why waste your time on pointless arguments?[/quote] For me, it's part of a continual learning process of how to reason with unreasonable people. Someone needs to do it; it's the only way we can progress as a society.
[quote who="lulapilgrim" reply="21" id="2186562"] The Big Bang theory is pure imaginative bunk....it violates physical laws and common sense. And yet, we've seen that it isn't something that people refuse to think about....as a majority of scientists today have accepted that nothing packed together tightly, condensed somehow into a single tiny spot and then it decided to explode producing neutrons, protons and electrons that somehow hurled themselves ourward
[quote who="mommie4life" reply="15" id="2186234"]I was responding to his point of view. If there was nothing, then where did everything come from. If there was a "primordial soup" or whatever you want to call it, then where did that come from? The question is still there no matter which way you look at it. It's just something that people refuse to think about or think is unimportant. It's up to them, believe what they will, just saying there's always that question and we dont' have an answer
[quote who="mommie4life" reply="22" id="2180314"]Just a quick question. I didn't read all this thread, so please excuse me if someone's already talked about this, but I was just wondering the answer would be of the people posting here. Question: You say that you can't prove that God exists because if there was nothing when God created everything then there wouldn't have been God. If this is so then how come you can say that science says that there was a primordial goop that the uni
[quote who="lulapilgrim" reply="4" id="2170038"] Where did you get that it's impossible to know anything about God? [/quote] As I said earlier, from the people who claim it's impossible to prove that he exists. If that statement is true, then it is, by definition, impossible to KNOW anything about him. [quote]Look around, is it not the eager promise of spring where you are? The minute details of nature's organization should stagger our minds and give us just a glimp
[quote who="the_Peoples_Party" reply="9" id="2171084"]All you did was ad hominem, circumstantial ad hominen, and poisoning the well. By the way, those aren't compliments those are fallacies.[/quote] The entire argument earlier was not based on science, it was based on the idea that the entire world is a Chinese plot to destroy the U.S, and that certain people are telling "the truth" but being drowned out by the world conspiracy. In that case, it's not at all ad hominem to
[quote who="CobraA1" reply="1" id="2168586"] First the logic problem: "All A are B" does not imply "All not A are all not B" Actually, my logic was this: A implies B Not A Therefore, (B or not B ) I was trying to say "not B" is possible; I was not asserting that "not B" is the only logical conclusion.[/quote] Well, "B or not B" is a tautology: it's just a generically true statement that holds for everything, so it's basically usel
[quote who="Leauki" reply="2" id="2168902"] Whence do you take that? Because I said that it got colder for the last two years???[/quote] No, because you said that maybe global warming isn't even real. Actually, you keep switching between "Of course global warming is real, but it's not man-made" and "Maybe global warming's not even happening". [quote]I am sick and tired of people who treat me as their intellectual inferiors just because I happen to disagree with t
-edit- I think there's a little too much psychotic rage going on in this thread to enjoy it anymore... i'll leave you gentlemen to your ranting. ;)
[quote]Everything that has a beginning has a cause. [/quote] ^^^ Not necessarily true. But it's just stating a premise, so as far as logic goes, it's fine. [quote]The universe has a beginning, therefore the universe has a cause. [/quote] ^^^ Would be true if the first one is true, so this line is ok. [quote]God does not have a beginning, therefore god does not need a cause.[/quote] ^^^ Doesn't work for two reasons. First th
[quote who="Spartan" reply="11" id="2168400"] The problem is the question is flawed from its inception. You are still equating infringement with theft. There's a substantial, practical difference between the two. Theft causes material loss. Copyright infringement does not.[/quote] Lol. Not you too. The evasiveness is getting ridiculous in this thread. Next time someone says "Do you like my hat?" I'm going to reply with "Hats are irrelevant" or "Your question is
[quote who="psychoak" reply="6" id="2167824"] Really? Every time I give you the answer you don't want to hear, you ignore it and pretend I'm just a pirate. Perhaps if you don't want me to call you an idiot, you should actually think about what I'm telling you, as you suggest I should do.[/quote] It's not that you're giving me answers I don't want to hear. It's that you're not actually answering the question. The answer is really very simple, it's either "Y
[quote who="lulapilgrim" reply="14" id="2168088"] Do you really believe that the universe and all its regulating laws came together ON ITS OWN? What did it come from? [/quote] Yes. It came from the Big Bang. [quote]The reason why there is no way the universe came into existence upon its own comes from the principle that the greater cannot come from the less; rather the less must always come from the greater[/quote] But that's not an actual "p
[quote who="Leauki" reply="11" id="2167820"]It is THAT type of pollution that the Kyoto treaty has confirmed as acceptable, and that's a stupid way to try to protect the environment whichever way you put it.[/QUOTE] Kyoto doesn't say their pollution is acceptable. It says that it is unacceptable, but that China would be allowed an extra few years as a grace period to fix it because its economy was crap, it doesn't have easy access to new technology like first world countries, an
[quote]Without mass "pirate support" Adobe would never become industry standard in all (multi)media software... (and they are well aware of this fact!)[/quote] Really? So what would have replaced PDF's and photoshop if the pirates weren't there to "help"?
[quote who="Leauki" reply="9" id="2167748"] No, and whether or not global warming is real has nothing to do with whether humanity caused it or not or whether we have little or much influence on the climate either way. [/quote] Yeah, yeah, i keep forgetting that global warming denialists are switching over to saying it's real but it's not our fault. I meant to say anthropogenic global warming. My post would still be exactly the same. The sc