HorseStrangler

HorseStrangler

Joined Member # 3646932
0 Posts 139 Replies 9,490 Reputation

[quote]Proffesional means being a good sport and letting your winning opponent have fun even though you are not enjoying yourself that much so that when it's YOUR time to kick ass, you will also have fun and not have to cut the game short because your enemy got scared and quitted.[/quote]Why not just enjoy the process of getting to that point. Demanding that people continue to play a game past a point where they're having fun seems silly to me.

106 Replies 130,410 Views

[quote]For the record, people complain about premades in customs as well if not more. I happen to fall in the very large and undefined category of "premade" because I have 2 RL friends and 1 brother who I like to play games with, and this is currently that game. We are definetely not great players by any stretch of the word, ranging from 60% to 20% win rates, yet we're still hated on simply because we know each other. Its like "omg you guys know each other? Premade!! DIE IN A FIRE

18 Replies 6,151 Views

There are some exceptions besides snipe I suppose. Maybe hitting a critical mass on AoE damage with dual TBs would be unnecessarily punitive for minion builds, but seriously for the most part this all just goes back to people not liking being sniped to death, which as I said is pretty much brought in check by priests/monk idols anyway.

85 Replies 36,094 Views

[quote]not mcuh of a differnece. at level 10 this baraly was around 200 hp (or was it arround 300?) more that the priests healed then the bishops. at lower level of course even less of a difference.[/quote]If a player had 5k health he would have been healed for 1500 by rank 3, now he'll be healed for 1100 by a rank 4 minion, or 950 by a rank 3... That's a pretty massive change when you consider the priests heal every 5 seconds, aka faster than sedna heals herself without cooldown reduct

63 Replies 159,152 Views

[quote who="SoFFacet" reply="13" id="2328463"]Quoting Obscenitor, reply 9I'm really interested in how differently people are going to play a mortal sedna. Its not that much of a change (22% still leads to ~1.4k heals if you health stack), but I'd guess slightly less pounce spammage, in favor of heal. Slightly. Mainly it'll affect item buy order, as ~1.5k to upgrade your monks 100% was sweet and could take precedence over certain other 1.5k items. Now it'll cost ~2k to upgrade to upgrade

63 Replies 159,152 Views

I'm really interested in how differently people are going to play a mortal sedna. :)

63 Replies 159,152 Views

They're only exploits in the sense that you exploit the cast time of rook's hammer by interrupting him, or you exploit the ability to lower tower damage by equipping more armor. Nothing unfair or unintended is happening, little micromanagement tricks complicate and improve the game.

30 Replies 15,620 Views

[quote who="Lugh" reply="4" id="2327852"]They simply need to reset everyont to zero on everything when stats are actually working [/quote]I think that nuking everyone's favor points is a bad idea if you want to bolster the game's popularity and lure players back.

7 Replies 7,762 Views

Well you guys may disagree, but I think that priests pretty much fix the cheesiness of the most despised doubles. This solution may be a bit extreme and I'm sure most people wouldn't agree, but I think it'd be interesting to remove the priest upgrade completely and make them roll out at rank 3 like archers do at rank 2. It would pretty much remove issues with triple snipes, spits, etc. and it'd also balance out monks a bit, because seriously they're complete game changers as-i

85 Replies 36,094 Views

[quote who="Jomungur"]Based on that close game we played a couple of nights ago, I tend to agree with you that late game towers (plus orb) can be effective. That said, you were spamming late game tower farms more quickly than most tower Rooks I've faced. Were you using staff of renewal to mitigate the long cool-down? I don't think many tower rooks use that item in their build.[/quote]I don't think the tower rook build can function without that item. 10 second tower

47 Replies 102,318 Views

The long and short of it is that people hate getting hit with double snipe, spit, and mines. Because of those they made a broader house rule that's pretty pointless. Doubles are fine, but seriously I draw the line at triple reg.

85 Replies 36,094 Views

[quote who="Spooky" reply="13" id="2325955"]I don't understand how suddenly a client side fix is needed for this, since this problem didn't occur after a Demigod patch?[/quote]At least on WoW hotfixes were generally server side, not client side. I assume it's the same here since there was some kind of hotfix last week which didn't include this.

47 Replies 9,101 Views

Lemme clarify that I don't think this build is bad you just framed it in a way which makes it not just a hammer build but also an attack on tower builds. I just think that it would require significant team support, which is fine if you're doing premades but suicide (in my opinion) if you're pugging frequently. Also I agree that at least one rank of towers would go a long way on this build. Rook is the only one who can allow allies to warp in and assist, and he's also the slowe

47 Replies 102,318 Views

The best part about playing rook is that most people won't go doubles. A bad rook is the worst DG in the game, even worse than a regulus that won't buy HP gear, so you can spare yourself a ton of frustration if you get good with rook yourself. Onto your specific rook build I wouldn't recommend it without extended healer support. Even Erebus could be enough if you play your cards right and he uses bite, monks, and mass charm correctly. Witho

47 Replies 102,318 Views

[quote who="lifekatana" reply="25" id="2323567"]All the starcraft and blizzard loving lol. Ever been to the WoW forums? yeah...and that if for monthly subscription. Anyway, for all its sucesses starcraft also has a couple of flaws. There are features directly designed to make your micro/macro slower. There is even a disscusion in SCII to limit ui options:O.[/quote]I don't think those 'flaws' were put in to reduce micro capacity, they were just limitations of the s

31 Replies 96,325 Views

[quote who="Primal Zed" reply="4" id="2325066"]I'm surprised Sedna is higher than Rook and Oak.[/quote]I'm not so surprised with Oak, but I'm very surprised with Rook, but I guess I can kind of see why. She must just get a ton of kills in most games and take home cit upgrades, kills, gold, and deaths more consistently than other DGs.

19 Replies 23,520 Views

[quote who="Primal Zed" reply="19" id="2325052"]I don't think "being professional" is necessarily synonymous with the internet gaming term "pro." From my point of view, a "pro" is simply someone who is very good at the game, while the term "professional" as it was used in the OP refers to following a line of conduct.[/quote]You may be right, but I genuinely think he meant that highly skilled players wait out the citadel defeat. -edit- I misread your post so hopefully you didn't read

106 Replies 130,410 Views

I average just over 90 favor points per game by your sytsem. :) The rook average favor points seem way, way lower than they should be, damage and reinforcements are pretty much giveaways for rook and all the others are fair game (except flags, which I rarely get).

19 Replies 23,520 Views

[quote who="Miyamiya" reply="25" id="2325013"]If the ranking system worked I might support that.[/quote]Support what, stats in game? It doesn't matter if people support it because it's already happening in 1.2. [e digicons]O:)[/e] Also what do you mean specifically? Are you saying you want the rankings to work or that you want the games to be recorded more accurately before they're shown in-game. If it's the former I think the solution is to just show win/loss along wit

85 Replies 47,165 Views