depends, i got plenty of photos on Panoramio, that would take quite a while to download them all. especially as they are on my hd and the sd cards anyways.
moshi
the screenshot shows how to export all your Google data.. one should of course not do exactly what is is shown on the screenhot, but choose Reader instead. no part of your Circles will depart.
[quote who="Philly0381" reply="2" id="3374438"]Seems to me I remember that the old USSR and the Old and New Russia didn't and doesn't think too much about protecting individual civil rights. I could be wrong, you know how us old folks are. [/quote] if you would be a little older you might remember that the USA introduced full civil rights for all citizens just about 25 years before the dissolution of the USSR. it's 2013 no
[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="44" id="3373166"]And that, I suppose, makes it right?[/quote] i did not say that. you were talking about that some practices would be illegal or theft. they are not. if something is legal or illegal has nothing to do wether it is right or wrong. the first is law, the second is personal opinion. i for example consider large parts of sharia law to be wrong. others (also on this forum) seem to like the eye-for-an-eye approach and capital punishm
[quote who="Youss1" reply="11" id="3373145"] Thank you![/quote] do yourself a favor and get a real list. http://ws.geonames.org/countryInfoCSV
did not remember this guy in particular, but this is indeed scary ... they really made him the director of the NSA after this happened under his command. looks like they consider him competent :(
[quote]Incidentally, guess whose intelligence crews ran Abu Ghraib.[/quote] US Army and CIA? of course i still wouldn't believe anything an NSA representative says. i don't think though, that Google was "instructed" by anybody. they release their transparency reports since three years now. i just hope President Putin can stop Obama from doing his own version of the Kosovo/Lewinsky stunt to distract you Americans from this a
[quote who="DaveBax" reply="6" id="3370039"]I don't know what words you used to Google fences bugs but I tried many and couldn't find anything.[/quote] you just need to search for Stardock Fences bugs and you'll find plenty. what did you get? gardening sites? :) that's the good thing about trial versions. you just can't expect a Windows software to work on all of the myriads of possible software and har
[quote who="kryo" reply="8" id="3368936"] Quoting DrJBHL, reply 4I'd suggest removing those kind of words you gratuitously added to your replies. Quite frankly, the 'list' is a joke. Suggesting anyone needs to tiptoe around such a thing is to miss the point entirely. Either you're already being followed, in which case it doesn't matter anyway, or you're not, in which case the list is so over-broad (pork? really?) that its application alone agains
[quote who="Uvah" reply="11" id="3367878"] Yeah but it doesn't happen in Chrome, that's what I'm using now. I think its because https is not integrated into chrome like it is in FF. [/quote] no, it is. as i said, i get a similar message in Chrome. i would rather suspect one of your regular malware infections changed a few phishing-related security settings on all your installed browsers and the (maybe even clean) install of the new FireFox
because either you connected to http ://www.wincustomize.com before instead of https ://www.wincustomize.com or WC did something to render their SSL certificate invalid. i doubt that though, i don't remember they ever had support for secure browsing. i get similar messages in Internet Explorer, Chrome and Opera Next if i try to connect to https ://www.
[quote who="Uvah" reply="7" id="3367806"] Oops! One too many. Notice what it says about what site the certificate is for. I never heard of edgerunner.[/quote] everything is normal. you are trying to connect to https ://www.wincustomize.com WC does not have a valid SSL certificate, so you get this error. see more here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
[quote who="Island Dog" reply="12" id="3366997"] Quoting moshi, reply 11right in this article they already admit that they do scan your mail to a small extent. wether one wants to believe that this is all there is depends on how much a fan of Microsoft or how much a cynic one is. Could be, but Google is an ad company. Microsoft isn't. [/quote] oh they are one too, they are just not good at it. else you folk
Google. love the knowlege graph and now especially the current Google Maps beta. other search engines are poor for non-English (Bing for example) or non-Russian (Yandex) users or do not offer multiple languages at all (Naver, Baidu).
[quote who="Island Dog" reply="8" id="3366942"] http://www.wired.com/business/2012/08/how-microsoft-will-profit-off-webmail-without-reading-your-inbox/ [/quote] right in this article they already admit that they do scan your mail to a small extent. wether one wants to believe that this is all there is depends on how much a fan of Microsoft or how much a cynic one is. ;) [quote who="your article"] Bruce Hall, general manager of W
[quote who="Island Dog" reply="4" id="3366849"] Quoting kona0197, reply 3 Sound familiar? Sound just like Google? And Hotmail. Hotmail/Outlook.com doesn't scan your email for ads. [/quote] it's run by the same company that already admitted scanning SkyDrive folders, so i wouldn't count on it. ;) i don't have a problem with it in general, it sure helps the Gmail spam filter, haven'
[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="40" id="3366799"] Honestly? This is all a rather sterile discussion since WB is not usable on Linux...and I for one find it hard to live w/o WB.[/quote] you would lack the huge library of skins WindowBlinds has. but i would consider dektop Linux superior for customization in every single aspect technology-wise. no Photoshop though. maybe in the future the internet gets faster and some of Adobe's applications could run in the
[quote who="kona0197" reply="39" id="3366792"] Moshi do you not pay attention? I use Windows 7. I have since this new machine was built. And yes, linux will not work on a day to day basis for me, but I don't like the way we talk about it around here when you all don't have all of the facts. [/quote] oh, i just found it amusing that you say both " I have no problem getting drivers for Linux." and " my wireless printer does not work with any flavor
[quote who="kona0197" reply="34" id="3366575"] Well look at this way. Google is selling that $250 dollar laptop. It runs Linux. Sells are good. People mostly just want a computer to browse the net, email, word processor, spreadsheets, and listen to music. [/quote] typical Kona statement. it sells actually even worse than the SurfaceRT. http://www.zdn
that happened because you clicked a direct link to an installer. Flash always wants to install something extra, be it Chrome, McAfee or Google Drive. it's opt-out if you visit the Flash download site at Adobe.com.
for individuals no really. for institutions and larger businesses definitely. i don't think it was a smart move to drastically change the ui and drop support for XP at almost the same time. it wont be Ubuntu, but rather Red Hat and SuSE though. softwarewise, for me it lacks Photoshop (unfortunately that is the most important one) only, the rest of my main software (LibreOffice, Chrome, Inkscape, Eclipse, VLC, SciTE, ...) exists for both OSs. if you're a gamer tho
this has something to do with where/how user settings are stored. maybe it would help if you run it as administrator and clone the Windows 7 home directory structure on your computer (including hidden folders like %APPDATA%). this is just a guess, do not waste your time with it. seriously no point in running a maybe abandoned application on a soon officialy abandoned OS. there must be dozens of applications to display the current weath
well, if privacy is a main concern DuckDuckGo or FAROO should be your first choice for search engines. i wouldn't call their results superior to Google though. Google has a massive lead on semantic search over it's competitors. even a fascinating technology like Siri looks like smoke and mirrors compared to it. the only competitor i see challenging them in terms of instant results is Yandex which is very innovative recently. their current beta is worth a loo
try all searches and you'll find out that Google is mor capable than Bing the article misses a big one. try "spell football in spanish" Google also will display the latest results if you enter a team's name. depends likely on your locale. i get no results for American sports, but German football teams work. another search engine with instant answers is duckduckgo.com shameless plug: i built a Rainmeter skin myself that uses a multitude of apis for