[quote who="IskatuMesk" reply="243" id="2974365"]No. Not even close. Also, development time =! chance of completion. I would wonder how you even draw such a conclusion.[/quote] Take Duke Nukem Forever for example, it took so long to complete, but completed it was.
Zeta1127
[quote who="CRZYnLAZY" reply="21" id="2973598"]An Ares? I'm more worried about a ZUES!!! [/quote] At lest spell Zeus properly.
[quote who="Yarlen" reply="13" id="2973877"]Right now I'll simply say, "When it's done."[/quote] "When it's done" should be every artist's answer to release date questions, but some people just don't understand that concept.
[quote who="Yarlen" reply="46" id="2973544"]You can do this already with the Dev exe that's in the game directory.[/quote] The problem with that is, only modders and other people like that know how to use the Dev.exe.
Improved the article based on your post, Darvin, though it probably still needs some more work.
Holy Trinity is one of the best ways to use Vengeance, that article needs some work though, but it should give you a good idea of what it entails. And of course, Darvin would beat me to it. Darvin, could you fact check Holy Trinity, the person who wrote the section I got the info from wasn't sure on some things?
[quote who="Hegemon76" reply="235" id="2972179"]This has to be the longest developing mod in the history of modding. I doubt it will ever be done. Sucks[/quote] Definitely not a good thing to whine about anything being worked on by Swiss Knight, because he doesn't like it, take heed of what he says in the After Action Report from earlier in this thread, it will serve you well. Perfection takes time to pull off.
The thing about Homeworld is it was so well done to begin with, the story was top notch and the gameplay was solid, never has there been another 3D RTS quite like it, besides its derivatives of course, I mean it even had a GotY edition, so they clearly did something right. Cataclysm and Raider Retreat were basically DLC. Based on what I have seen in watching replays, heard in listening to what people are saying, and observed in editing the StarCraft Wiki; one of the things about SC2 t
[quote who="Draakjacht" reply="45" id="2972067"]Funny that. Once I saw the price, I didn't even bother checking the specs.[/quote] Yeah, the cost is going to be a lot, between Wings of Liberty and the expansions Heart of the Swarm and Legacy of the Void, that is going to be a small fortune.
[quote who="Kitkun" reply="12" id="2972047"]TEC are the ones to come up with the Kol's Adaptive shield that blocks phase missiles.[/quote] Well, there is that.
[quote who="Draakjacht" reply="43" id="2971988"]Starcraft 2 isn't worth dishing out the cash right now, so I might pick it up well down the line when they have a nouveax battlechest.[/quote] That is exactly what I am thinking, and I don't have a computer capable of handling it.
[quote who="Draakjacht" reply="41" id="2971916"]I could argue that this is generally true. Granted, I opted out after Warcraft III. Not a fan. Assuming they have maintained the same general model, I would say that they do well.[/quote] Well, the ones I have played have been great, and I barely found out about StarCraft and Diablo, haven't tried to get into Warcraft yet.
Game of the Year editions are great, but as Kodiak888 said, GotY editions aren't always available. I got Homeworld not long after my dad got this computer I am using, and it was great because that it was the GotY edition, so it came with the soundtrack. LoD made Diablo II into the game everyone knows, because it was definitely more than a new act, it was a new experience, something Blizzard does better than anybody with their expansions.
I agree that work is still needed, and support looking into all of the proposed changes. [quote who="Darvin3" reply="9" id="2971785"]Totally in favour of this! Instantly solves Advent's ludicrous phase missile vulnerability and brings some utility to the TEC/Vasari shield upgrades.[/quote] One would think that the Advent's Battle Psintegrae could do something about phase missiles, more so than any other faction, besides the masters of phase space themselves, the Vasari
Well, I contacted Support, and got the standard bounce back reply; I suspect that I just need to get a new computer of my own instead of trying to work with this older Gateway. I noticed that, and the new one is even better, but it is the one having the problems.
The thing is, I never had these problems before I switched graphics cards. Yes, the game is completely unplayable.
Yeah, yeah, Kitkun, I should probably talk to Support, but I thought that maybe someone could solve the problem here!
I am having some technical difficulties with Sins and its expansions since I switched from a NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 to a NVIDIA GeForce 6200 (so I could play Battlefield 2, since it was on sale on Impulse). I even updated to the latest drivers, and I am still having problems; specifically, the game will start up just fine, but when it gets to the menu screen, it is extremely laggy to the point of unplayability, the computer actually becomes unresponsive. Any help on this matter would be grea
I can't even play Sins in general, though, it might have something to do with my new video card.
No, it won't.
The Solanus Adjudicator definitely needs some work. The Illuminator Vessel won't be viable with that plan, because beam weapons are currently at tier 3 along side the Illuminator Vessel. The Iconus Guardian shouldn't be put in the main fleet, because Shield Projection is a channeling ability, meaning it can be interrupted by issuing new orders.
[quote who="StatusIpod" reply="4" id="2968289"]It is not an exact duplicate.[/quote] I know it isn't an exact duplicate, but why couldn't Harry at least repair his wand? So you are saying I never should have read the Deathly Hallows or any of the other books years ago before the movies were even conceived? [quote who="GoaFan77" reply="5" id="2968292"]Please, don't ever compare Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter. That's like comparing Shakespeare to Doctor Seuss
[quote who="Big David" reply="2" id="2968265"]Yeah. I cannot understand the change in wand disposal.[/quote] You got it, that is my exact complaint about the ending, it makes no sense. This isn't the first time they have done something to the ending to one of the films; they omitted Quirrell and Snape's challenges (I am rather fond of Snape's logic challenge) protecting the Philosopher's Stone, and they omitted Dumbledore's burial in the White Tomb at the end of th
I am a little irritated with the end of the movie. I will provide an explanation when others have had a chance to comment.
Not what I am reading, but oh well.